No off target in foil - Pros and Cons

Discussion in 'Rules and Referee Questions' started by Tad Salyards, Dec 6, 2018 at 12:14 PM.

  1. Tad Salyards

    Tad Salyards Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2018
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi, all. I saw this proposed rule change and was surprised there was no thread covering it. Perhaps I just didn't find it?

    So I will come right out and say that I think it's high time for off targets to die in foil. My primary reasoning is that in higher level foil fencing off-targets are fairly rare anyhow so the impact would be minimal. Getting rid of them would sure speed up beginner level bouts/tournaments :) .

    It seems like a fundamental change to how ROW and priority are defined. Theoretical it's now more important not to miss than it is to have right away. With off-targets a valid counter attack against a fencer with ROW that lands off target is not awarded to the counter-attacking fencer; without off-targets it would be. I'm sure I'm missing many of the implications of this rule change.

    Looking forward to the conversation :)

    -Tad
     
  2. tbryan

    tbryan Podium

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    270
    This forum is generally only used for questions about applying rules in specific cases or guidelines about how to make certain calls. A general discussion about a proposed rule change is more appropriate in the general forum. Here's one of the threads about the removal of off-target lights: https://www.fencing.net/forums/threads/test-for-foil-the-absence-of-the-white-light.142844/

    There's also some discussion about it here: https://www.fencing.net/forums/threads/2018-fie-congress-rule-change-proposals-published.142860/

    You could revive one of those threads if you're interested in discussing it further.

    And many of us feel that that's the primary problem with the proposal. Here's my response. If you want to discuss it further, I recommend replying on that thread instead of here.
     
  3. keropie

    keropie Podium

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,478
    Likes Received:
    178
    There is discussion of the proposal (and other proposals) in this thread: https://www.fencing.net/forums/threads/2018-fie-congress-rule-change-proposals-published.142860/

    The idea is bad. Getting rid of off target in foil would be essentially as bad as reducing epee target to the torso. It completely changes the character of the weapon, makes height a real advantage by removing extended target, would make the weapon more passive, and more terrible things I have not the requisite effort to list. There's also a video floating around of the fencer who won the satellite event where they did this as a test, and her reaction. Spoiler: it's not a positive reaction.
     
  4. Inquartata

    Inquartata Podium

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2001
    Messages:
    36,867
    Likes Received:
    1,339
    And the capper: But the refs loved it.
     
  5. keropie

    keropie Podium

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,478
    Likes Received:
    178
    As a ref, I'm against it. As a coach, I'm against it. As a spectator, I'm against it. As a foilist, I find it abhorrent.
     
    NeilNZ likes this.
  6. ChrisL

    ChrisL Made the Cut

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2012
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    4
    No they didn't.
     
  7. ktinoue3

    ktinoue3 Podium

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2014
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    16
    Do you have a link to said video?
     
  8. Inquartata

    Inquartata Podium

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2001
    Messages:
    36,867
    Likes Received:
    1,339
    The girl who was there and fenced in the test with this new scheme said that they did.
     
  9. keropie

    keropie Podium

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,478
    Likes Received:
    178
  10. ktinoue3

    ktinoue3 Podium

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2014
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    16
    found it from the page. Updated direct link below.
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2018 at 6:37 PM
  11. Inquartata

    Inquartata Podium

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2001
    Messages:
    36,867
    Likes Received:
    1,339
    Yeah, I found it too and tried to post the link, got "Cannot load Facebook SDK. Disable any adblocker or tracking protection and try again".

    It's on The Fencing Podcast's FB page as well as on the fencer's ( Eline Rentier ) page.
     
  12. NeilNZ

    NeilNZ Made the Cut

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2009
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    7
    She said the ref liked it because it led to less delay in the bout. Fundamentally though, the ref is there for the fencers, not the other way around. Fencers don't fence to entertain a referee, nor a crowd for that matter. A lot of these proposals are wanting to fundamentally change the nature of the sport to cater to an audience that essentially doesn't exist, or to make the running of a competition smoother for the DT or TV schedules or whatever. Not cool.
     
  13. Inquartata

    Inquartata Podium

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2001
    Messages:
    36,867
    Likes Received:
    1,339
    Yes. I wholly agree. Much like the visor masks, which persisted for a number of years and would probably still be with us had they not turned out to pose serious safety issues. Not cool, but an unfortunate forced reality.

    But this is how things are, and if the refs are in favor and if they do in fact speed up the bouts...the fencing and fencers wishes be damned seems to be the FIE's attitude.
     
  14. NeilNZ

    NeilNZ Made the Cut

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2009
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    7
    I spoke to a few FIE refs at the recent Commonwealth Championships... none of them were in favour of it, and these guys are all reffing at world cups etc regularly. Seems very much like the tail wagging the dog at this point.
     

Share This Page