12 Planets?

Discussion in 'Water Cooler' started by latenight, Aug 16, 2006.

  1. latenight

    latenight Podium

    Joined:
    May 2, 2000
    Messages:
    3,727
    Likes Received:
    261
  2. sabreur

    sabreur Podium

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2000
    Messages:
    2,352
    Likes Received:
    261
    Oh man, this is so going to screw up my astrology chart... :blah:
     
  3. oiuyt

    oiuyt Podium

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2000
    Messages:
    10,246
    Likes Received:
    977
    Worse (if making planetary charts outdated is bad -- or even just nursery-room solar system mobiles) is if that definition gets approved there will relatively soon be dozens more planets.

    -B
     
  4. gtmac

    gtmac Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,328
    Likes Received:
    67
    I can hear the 5th dimension now...

    "When Ceres is in the 7th house and Charon aligns with 2003UB313"

    How trippingly it rolls off the tongue.:dunce:
     
    RoninX likes this.
  5. IHateMrPotatohead

    IHateMrPotatohead Rookie

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    39
    Ack!

    It won't be: "My Very Educated Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas"

    Anymore!!!!!!


    How am I gonna remember Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Ceres, Jupiter....:mad:
     
  6. Mitchell

    Mitchell hi Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,263
    Likes Received:
    467
    misleading. pluto is being relabeled as a "pluton", not a planet. the other celestial bodies will also be classified as "plutons". we will have 8 planets and 4 plutons.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2006
  7. gtmac

    gtmac Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,328
    Likes Received:
    67
    You could always try:

    My Very Educated Mother Couldn't Just Shut Up N' Passively Comply (in) 2003, Useless B****!
     
    latenight likes this.
  8. gtmac

    gtmac Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,328
    Likes Received:
    67
    Actually given the description I think it works like this. All plutons are planets, but not all planets are plutons.
     
  9. latenight

    latenight Podium

    Joined:
    May 2, 2000
    Messages:
    3,727
    Likes Received:
    261

    That is correct per the proposed definitions
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2006
  10. IHateMrPotatohead

    IHateMrPotatohead Rookie

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    39


    Oh! Ot's just like squares and rectangles in Geometry! Yay! :rolleyes:
     
  11. Mitchell

    Mitchell hi Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,263
    Likes Received:
    467
    according to the definition of binary stars, they are also both planets, but we still use the most specific identifier. these new planets have been picked up and are intended to be referred to as plutons, not planets.
     
  12. sabreur

    sabreur Podium

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2000
    Messages:
    2,352
    Likes Received:
    261
    Eight planets.

    Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune.
     
  13. DHCJr

    DHCJr Armorer

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    5,383
    Likes Received:
    200
    Here is the definition.

    "A planet is a celestial body that (a) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (b) is in orbit around a star, and is neither a star nor a satellite of a planet."

    One of the 12 planets proposed is Charon the moon of Pluto.

    If Pluto is classified as a planet, then how can a Charon, since it is a satellite of a planet?

    They also talk of 53 planets, if this passes.
     
  14. latenight

    latenight Podium

    Joined:
    May 2, 2000
    Messages:
    3,727
    Likes Received:
    261

    "A pair of round objects that orbit around a point in space that is outside both objects — meaning the center of gravity (or barycenter) is between the two planets in space as with Pluto and Charon — would be called double planets"
     
  15. umbrella

    umbrella Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    1
    Interplanetary Fellows

    I agree in totality. The 5th Dimension is great, but alas gone......UP UP AND AWAY.....is one of my favorite songs.......


    I find it misleading as well, and a dissapointment that our "scientists" spent a few Billion dollars to call an asteroid a planet, while there's mass confusion on the Third Rock from the Sun.
     
  16. fencingfrog

    fencingfrog Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2006
    Messages:
    755
    Likes Received:
    7
    its flippin' retarded.

    just admit that pluto shouldn't be a planet, and leave us with the 8 original planets!!! back in 1930 or whatever it was they messed up. admit it, and we wont have 2 bazillion plutons/planet like rocks.

    xena is a cool name though. :D
     
  17. oiuyt

    oiuyt Podium

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2000
    Messages:
    10,246
    Likes Received:
    977
    ???

    Neptune was discovered not quite 160 years ago, how can it be "original"? Ceres was a planet for nearly 50 years (starting in 1801) before being demoted. It had already lost its status before Neptune was discovered. Pallas, Juno, and Vesta similarly were considered planets during this time. Once other objects started being found in the Asteroid Belt in 1845 they were all demoted.

    That said, there is a naming convention being floated of "Classical Planets" meaning those discovered and considered planets as of 1900 (so not including Ceres, et al). It matches what you're apparently referring to as "original" planets.

    -B
     
  18. mrbiggs

    mrbiggs Podium

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    7,837
    Likes Received:
    477
    My Very Educated Mother Just Said "Uh-oh! No Pluto!"

    -Colbert Report
     
    KShan5[PrFC] likes this.
  19. DHCJr

    DHCJr Armorer

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    5,383
    Likes Received:
    200
    Because of the definition above in a few (billion) years, the term '3rd Rock from the Sun' will be confusing. Which planet are we talking about? Since the Moon is moving away from the Earth, the center of gravity is moving out and will eventually be outside of the Earth making the Moon a planet.

    I'm glad I took Astronomy when there was only 9 planets. Try memorizing 12, 54, 100 or whatever.

    Does anyone remember the little saying to help memorize the names of the planets?
     
  20. arc

    arc Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2004
    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    56
    From what I've seen in the news, there's been a bit of a revolt at the IAU meeting, with a number of astronomers rejecting the proposed definition ...

    To me, the whole thing is a bit ridiculous, particularly the role that scientists are giving to PR in determining a systematic nomenclature; in a way, it kind of reminds me of aluminum vs. aluminium. The point is to be able to communicate in an effective fashion ... and the proposed definition, while being rigorous enough to communicate some effective information with the label 'planet,' is also so overbroad that it fails to convey important information that could be included by some of the alternative systematic definitions ... *shrug*
     

Share This Page