Photos Needed

[frenzl]

justt aan overal poist onn speling: itt raely doest materr aas lnog aas yuo gett thee ppiont off thhe postts. -rihgt?

*mistakes happen*

[lfortier]

Everyone, what Army Fencer meant was "lets not turn this place into a flaming website like fencingsucks" -no offense to mr. ****** the hutt, but you've got to admit that that place is quite unfriendly. Once I tried posting on there and I got chewed out. Why is everyone like that?

[deadly lefty]

lfortier I'm sorry you feel that way because of some stupid mindless kids that are on this board lately. also to add does this ****** the hut remind anyone else of the comic book guy from the simpsons? oh yeah and Craig could you be so kind as to close this? thanks

[frenzl]

Originally posted by lfortier
Everyone, what Army Fencer meant was "lets not turn this place into a flaming website like fencing.net" -no offense to mr. ****** the hutt, but you've got to admit that that place is quite unfriendly. Once I tried posting on there and I got chewed out. Why is everyone like that?

do you mean fencingsucks.com?

[Soldier]

To Craig and/or Gav:

I'm pretty sure that when registering, the starter of this thread read the following sentence:

By clicking the Agree button, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-orientated, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws.

And then clicked the button below it labeled "Agree". The sentence technically prohibits only posts of, among other things, a sexually-oriented nature, but I would argue that the spirit of the agreement includes screennames. Additionally, one's screenname is an inalienable part of one's post.

[Faggot the Hutt]

Originally posted by Soldier
The problem lies in knowledge of some of your earlier behaviors, which have been reprehensible at best, and in fact quite trollish.

Pshaw. And, I'll prove it. Trolls expect to cause a reaction for the mere point of gaining attention, and/or causing a raucous. I, on the other hand, cause a relative amount of chaos, then go on to explain the reasons behind my madness, while teaching valuable life lessons to those who bite at my hook. For instance, have you been attacked by me? No, of course not. You've a somewhat open mind, and I leave you to your course. However, our resident stick-up-the-*** G.I. "Army Fencer," has a relatively small mind, and does not understand the learning process which you seem capable of grasping. I went on to explain a lesson to Army Fencer, but like the fool who cannot analyze his own life, he ignores the truth and repeats his earlier post like a parrot. Or, take Tireur for example. He refers to the more civilized south, yet he insults me like a brash, uncultured barbarian. Contradictory? I think so. Then, there's Deadly Lefty. I don't know what the deal with him is, but he's probably angry and bitter like most Russians I know. He should watch a couple hours of T.A.T.U., and return when he remembers that the cold war is over. I'm sorry you country sucks, D.L., but it's not our fault that you choose the wrong economic structure. Get over it!

Lastly, trolls do not accept fault with themselves. You can view my many other posts, here or at FS, and see that when I am wrong, I admit it without reservation. So, I am a bit of a maniac, but I am a fair and honest maniac. Now, how about sending me a picture? :-)


Lfortier, yes, FS is a rather unforgiving website. Make your arguments strong, and sharp; you'll do okay over there.



And, uh... D.L., Craig won't close this thread. He and I are... well... I shan't reveal details, but last night he gave me this wonderful bouquet of flowers. Thanks, Craigy poo.

[Faggot the Hutt]

Originally posted by Soldier
The sentence technically prohibits only posts of, among other things, a sexually-oriented nature, but I would argue that the spirit of the agreement includes screennames. Additionally, one's screenname is an inalienable part of one's post.

To think I'd complimented you earlier. Well! I should think that anything is sexually-oriented these days, but my name could just as easily refer to a bundle of sticks, or a certain British dish that includes onions and meat (if I recall correctly.)

It's all good.

[Soldier]

Originally posted by ****** the Hutt
Pshaw. And, I'll prove it. Trolls expect to cause a reaction for the mere point of gaining attention, and/or causing a raucous. I, on the other hand, cause a relative amount of chaos, then go on to explain the reasons behind my madness, while teaching valuable life lessons to those who bite at my hook. For instance, have you been attacked by me? No, of course not. You've a somewhat open mind, and I leave you to your course. However, our resident stick-up-the-*** G.I. "Army Fencer," has a relatively small mind, and does not understand the learning process which you seem capable of grasping. I went on to explain a lesson to Army Fencer, but like the fool who cannot analyze his own life, he ignores the truth and repeats his earlier post like a parrot. Or, take Tireur for example. He refers to the more civilized south, yet he insults me like a brash, uncultured barbarian. Contradictory? I think so. Then, there's Deadly Lefty. I don't know what the deal with him is, but he's probably angry and bitter like most Russians I know. He should watch a couple hours of T.A.T.U., and return when he remembers that the cold war is over. I'm sorry you country sucks, D.L., but it's not our fault that you choose the wrong economic structure. Get over it!

Lastly, trolls do not accept fault with themselves. You can view my many other posts, here or at FS, and see that when I am wrong, I admit it without reservation. So, I am a bit of a maniac, but I am a fair and honest maniac. Now, how about sending me a picture? :-)


Lfortier, yes, FS is a rather unforgiving website. Make your arguments strong, and sharp; you'll do okay over there.



And, uh... D.L., Craig won't close this thread. He and I are... well... I shan't reveal details, but last night he gave me this wonderful bouquet of flowers. Thanks, Craigy poo.

On the contrary. You have attacked me before, without the slightest provocation. As I said, your reprehensible behavior was in fact trollish, by the very definition that you just provided. Can I cite quotes for you? Thankfully, no - they were rather unsavory. They were also partially lost in the crash a while back, and I believe many were removed by Craig. My previous argument concerning the nature of your posts and screen name still stands as well. Your posts, including the one I just quoted, are of a sexual nature, and the content of many of your posts confirms the specific meaning intended by your screenname.

[Faggot the Hutt]

Originally posted by Soldier
On the contrary. You have attacked me before, without the slightest provocation.

Hm... And, you say that you cannot prove it because the posts were deleted. Convenient. However, I know that you are lying, and I can prove it. I registered for this site in April 2003. You registered in August 2003. This is the first time I've posted to FN since November 2003. The time at which I began my first tirade on FN was in April and May 2003. Very soon after, Craig prevented me from making any posts on this site until November 2003. I haven't posted a single (possibly) inflammatory remark on this site since you've been registered, the five months that you've been here. All the threads of mine that were deleted, were done so before you'd been registered, and the only threads in which you and I both participated had no word between us. Thus, you are a liar, or suffering from paranoid delusions.

Oh, you're gonna last a loooong time at the AF Academy with logic like yours.

[Soldier]

Before you call my honor into question, think about it yourself.

If I registered here after all the threads were deleted, then how would I know it happened at all? True, I could have found out from somebody else, but I think that rather unlikely, especially if my logic is as deplorable as you suggest.

Aside from all that, however, you will please note that the screenname "Swordsman" was registered in May 2001, nearly two full years before you ever posted here.

[Faggot the Hutt]

Originally posted by Soldier
Before you call my honor into question, think about it yourself.
If I registered here after all the threads were deleted, then how would I know it happened at all?

I'd been reading FN long before I registered for it. Your argument proves nothing.

by Solider
Aside from all that, however, you will please note that the screenname "Swordsman" was registered in May 2001, nearly two full years before you ever posted here.

Ah, I remember! You're the skinny, little stick-boy who threatened to kick my ***! Ha, hahahah! Well, Swordsman, apparently you've never viewed my work at FS, or you would know I can find virtually anyone, or anything on the net. And, in this case, I have found our first exchange. It was on 30 May, 2003. And, it was you attacked me:

http://www.fencing101.com/vb/showthr...4622#post74622

"Space_cadet returns.

I kicked your *** last time, and I'll do it again if necessary."


You even used harsh language. Oh, the trauma I had to endure.

Oh, look. Here are the pictures of you that I found on your website:

http://swordsman.8k.com/graphics/mallgarde.JPG
http://swordsman.8k.com/graphics/medals.JPG

[Soldier]

Oh, yes, five year old pictures from a website that hasn't been updated (let alone looked at) for nearly so long.

I will admit to mistaking you for an earlier troll whom I soundly defeated verbally - he disappeared. I will also admit to having much more respect for you than him, and to being a bit...shall we say, impetuous? Basic training did worlds of good for me.

Interesting to see some of the posts survived. I thought much more than that had been lost or removed. In any case, my arguments about your screenname and nature still stand, and the quote you just posted was in response to a previous attack of yours. But then, what good does arguing about the past do for right now?

[Faggot the Hutt]

Blah. Everyone knows AF basic training is about as rigorous as a stint at Club Med. I'm sure you got a pedicure, and everything else that goes along with AF "basic training." You must be so proud.

Glad to see you can admit some faults, AFTER I go back and do the research YOU should have done. You did attack me, though you still won't admit it. C'mon, flyboy, if you keep up this level of aptitude, you're gonna get kicked to the curb by Uncle Sam.

Of course, that assuming you get kicked out BEFORE I submit to your XO some of your earlier comments regarding homosexuals. Oh, didn't expect that one did you? I have the screenshots of your comments, so don't bother to edit them now. You've made some rather disparaging remarks against people of the "other" persuasion. The AF isn't too forgiving about that sort of thing. Would you like to provoke me further?

[Soldier]

I'd love to see the look on somebody's face in personnel after you ask for "Cadet Swordsman". Besides the fact that I don't have an XO, I doubt very much you know what that even stands for. Perhaps you should refresh yourself on the Air Force policy on homosexuals; they are actually much more forgiving than you realize. Research I should have done? As I have stated many times before on this board, I have neither the time nor the inclination to do a lot of research, and I did think the posts lost. Since the implication was not enough for you, I will state it explicitly: I did attack you - again, in response to one of your own.

You know nothing of Air Force basic training, let alone Academy basic training. While standard enlisted basic training has really not changed at all in quite a while, Academy basic training was, up until a year or so ago, nearly (and, depending on the cadre, sometimes actually) equivalent to Marine Corps basic training. This previous year, starting with my own class, they instituted an "agenda for change", which has met with varying approval from everyone. It does ease things up greatly after basic, and somewhat during basic. However, it is still quite the experience. And regardless, how do you know even a pedicure wouldn't have perhaps done me some good?

Do your own research befor you attack me or my Academy.

Would I like to provoke you further? If it brings about similar humorous threats, I think it could be quite entertaining. Because trust me, there's not a thing you can do to me.

[Faggot the Hutt]

Oh, the arrogance. Your "XO" would be this guy:

http://www.usafa.af.mil/pa/usafabios/usafa_cc.htm

I'm sorry if the terminology is incorrect, but the meaning is conveyed.

As for carrying out what I said, I can and will. There can't be many fencers/kendo-ga in the 10th Training Wing, let alone the entire academy. You will be very easy to find.

I can also send them this photo: http://swordsman.8k.com/cgi-bin/fram...raphics/me.JPG

I'll also be submitting your earlier discussion on African-Americans, women and dating, and Slavery. I find it particulary disturbing that you said Slavery was a good idea!!! Are you stupid?! And, then you have the nerve to criticize my name. Unbelievable.

*Update*

http://airforcesports.ocsn.com/sport...-fenc-mtt.html

I found your team website. Cadet 4th Class, eh...? Well, that was difficult. I'll leave it to the AF to finalize your identity. I won't be posting any names here, but it's fairly obvious who you are.

[Tireur]

Can you believe it, this guy knows how to use the internet!!!!!!!

What other tricks do you do?

[Inquartata]

DFTWDBTBAIFT

( Don't Feed Those Who Disclaim Being Trolls But Act Indistinguishably From Them )

[Faggot the Hutt]

How pathetic. You would call me a troll, but one who says Slavery is a good idea is tolerated. My god, I hope people like you are not prevalent throughout society.

[Faggot the Hutt]

Here you go, all. A link to a photo collection of all the wonderfully insightful comments made by Soldier/Swordsman.

And, remember, people say I'm worse than him.



http://free.hostdepartment.com/f/******dhutt/pathetic/


Where the asteriks are, put the first word in my name.

[Soldier]

Oh my, you're making this entirely too much fun for me. Let us take this bit by bit...

1. Lt. Gen. Rosa is the Superintendent of the Academy, not by any means my Executive Officer. The concept isn't even close. A very good man, by the way.

2. You are operating on the (incorrect) presumtion that I continued fencing here, or partake in kendo. As I have stated frequently before, I do not fence here (yet), nor do they have any kind of kend club/team. That is the primary reason for my change in screen name.

3. That picture is several years old; it is also one person out of eleven hundred. They will not care anywhere near enough to track the culprit down based on a five-year-old picture, especially when there are several others who look much like me.

Now to start on your out-of-context attacks.

3.jpg: Purest humor, as anybody who could see the context of the remark would realize.

4.jpg: A remark on the current air of political correctness throughout society. I respect (or disrespect) all people based on their individual merits and personality, regardless of race, religion, creed, nationality, descent, etc., and so forth. This includes those with higher levels of melanocite cells, commonly known as "blacks", "African-Americans", and otherwise. The comment was frustration at how it can be difficult to know just which politically-correct term to use for them; I wish they'd pick one and stick with it. My level of respect does not change one bit regardless of what I call them. I'm just trying to figure out what will be least offensive to them.

5.jpg: This was a discussion of slavery from a purely economic standpoint, morality set aside. Every one of us in the discussion agreed that morally, it is an evil thing. That is not what the debate was about.

6.jpg: See comments on "5.jpg".

7.jpg: Please note the comment regarding sarcasm.

8.jpg: This was a discussion in the thread (participated in by both males and females with equal vigor and very similar opinions) "How do you get a girlfriend?". The method described above spoke of being a trustworthy friend to a recently-rejected girl in need of one, then, after a suitable interval, looking for more. She's still free to say no at any time. The post, I believe, was not meant to imply that this is the only reason to be a trustworthy friend. My statement was only that the same has worked for me before, though it was not my intention.

9.jpg: The first is essentially a book review of a very funny book. The second is speaking of what is in fact a form of discrimination little different from that which black experienced in the south before extensive Civil Rights, but goes on still today, in fact glorified. It is inarguable fact that it happens, and I still stand by the position that discrimination of any kind is wrong.

10.jpg: A long listing of reasons I like girls. It is not by any means complete. I would ask if you disagree with any of those reasons to like girls, but I suppose that is not a wise question.

11.jpg: I don't see anything even slightly wrong with this post, from the same thread named in the comments regarding "8.jpg".

12.jpg: Look, it's me, at around 1720 today!


If that's the best you can come up with, look around a bit more - try researching "George Washington", "Bayer_Hunter" (not sure of the underscore), "355"'s early work, or "ReverseLunge". There's others, too, I'm sure, but I can't think of them offhand.




Sidenote: So I'm not the only one with the constant "Error on Page" note at the bottom of the screen.