[CFML] Re: future of SF looks more like CF - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > Fencing Lists and Archives > Classical Fencing Mailing List

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-29-2003, 07:01 PM   #1
Brian Schenck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
[CFML] Re: future of SF looks more like CF

"Bob Lyle" <blyle@s...> wrote:

> Then judo, vastrious forms of karate, tae kwan do and gung fu are
> also not martial arts because they too have a style element. You
> have a limited definition of "martial arts" which I do not ascribe
> to.
>

Jeff's point is not that these are not "martial arts", rather than
the "extreme" definition being applied to Sport Fencing (i.e.,
the "touch without being touched" or "as if they were sharp"
approach) can be taken in the opposite direction. That is, if one
says that a "martial art" must be practical in application and relate
strictly to combat techniques, then those "martial arts" which focus
purely on technique and style would, likewise, not be "martial arts".

Since, clearly, there is disagreement with the application in this
case -- why is it okay to apply the definition in the opposite
direction? Would you say that Bruce Lee, who advocated a very
pragmatic approach to the martial arts and focused on the final
outcome of the punch, did not practice martial arts because he did
not advocate style or formality? How different is this "focus on the
outcome" from the idea of "score touches"?

This is the crux of my problem -- the definition of "martial art"
seems to fit personal opinion more than anything else. Classical
Fencing is a "martial art", Sport Fencing isn't. But why isn't it?


> I do withdraw my "decline" comment, although I note that this
> thread started with a discussion of the (apparently) imminent
> demise of Olympic fencing..
>

It is true that fencing in the Olympics has been on the
proverbial "chopping block" for a while. The IOC is not fond of
sports which do not attract viewers, and therefore advertisers. And,
foolishly in some cases I believe, the FIE focuses on making fencing
more friendly to viewers. But this does not mean that Sport Fencing,
itself, is in decline. Merely its presence in the Olympics. Which,
personally, I wouldn't have a problem with.


-Brian


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles.
No Late Fees & Free Shipping.
Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/vhSowB/XP....kFAA/VRUolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CFML is sponsored in part by Purpleheart Armoury, now carrying rapier blunts and leather gorgets. http://www.woodenswords.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[CFML] Review of SSU Fencing Master Certificate Program Eric Myers Classical Fencing Mailing List 0 08-31-2005 02:00 AM
[CFML] Please review.... flanconade@aol.com Classical Fencing Mailing List 0 08-26-2005 08:00 PM
[CFML] ISMAC Tournament Results Jared Kirby Classical Fencing Mailing List 0 08-25-2005 02:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 PM.


(c) 1995 - 2007 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 -    Medieval Swords from the online Replica Sword Shop