| |
-
Senior Member
Array Weapon/Body Cord Tester Feedback Wanted! Hey All,
I'm starting some preliminary research for a pocket weapon/body cord tester product (similar in concept to those nice little Favero 4-light testers), and I'm interested in any ideas you guys have for the perfect pocket tester.
Now is a good time to loose your tongue and tell me your ideas for features and functions that you'd like to see in a pocket tester. Tell me what you don't like about the existing testers, and what weaknesses you've found. This is your opportunity to influence the design of a new pocket tester! 
Don't limit yourself to what you *think* can be implemented in a pocket-sized device. Would you like it to talk? Should it have a built-in tip-tape remover? Can opener? Obnoxious game show buzzer to use on bad referees?
How much would you be willing to pay for such a test box? I am sure everyone wants one for free but we need to remember: there ain't no such thing as a free lunch!
I look forward to hearing from you!
Later,
Eric -
The ideal would be a low-range (0-20 ohms) resistance readout, a socket for the weapon-end of the cord (perhaps just a 2-prong, with an adapter dongle for bayonet and others), combined with a way to easily test all direct- and cross- resistances. You could have A,B, and C buttons. Press the A button, you get the A-A resistance, press the B, get B-B resistance, etc. Press A and B together, you'll get the A-B crossover resistance displayed, and so forth.
Even if an actual resistance readout isn't practical, some way of indicating "passing" (i.e., R <= 1 ohm) as opposed to "functional" would be nice-- perhaps a bi-color LED that would show one color for a passing, another for functional-but-not-passing.
The short-break indicators on the Favero are useful and something similar should be included.
-Dave "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing noise they make as they go by."
-Douglas Adams -
Fencing Expert
Array - Something that works for all socket types
- Can be used to test a weapon without body cord
- can be used to test a wepon without a socket (some kind of alligator clips that you could put on the bare wires)
Neveel's suggestions would be nice too ;-) - Epee is the Louis Vuitton bag of fencing: only the best can get it, and the rest of the masses must content themselves with cheap knockoffs (sabre, foil)
- To not recognize the power of the French grip is to be in denial
-
Armorer
Array You have to ask about cost the body tester I build with Radio Shack Parts run about 100.00 threw in three go anlong meters you looking at 150.00 just to test bodycords.
Tim People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
George Orwell
www.yeoldearmourer.com -
Originally posted by neevel
The short-break indicators on the Favero are useful and something similar should be included.
-Dave VERY USEFUL. It's pretty annoying to 'fix' a body cord or weapon, test it w/an ohm meter, then bring it to the strip and it has a short somewhere but not a break. -
Senior Member
Array Some good suggestions there!
The short/break indicators are an excellent idea--it's really hard to see certain intermittent signals in foil.
I hadn't thought of making the tester large enough to test a body cord by itself, but that does remain an interesting possibility. Something like the Favero pocket tester is more what I was thinking of.
Of course, most fencers glance askew at the large number of knobs, meters, switches, lights, and connections on many armorer's test boxes. A pocket tester needs to be simple enough for a non-technically inclined fencer to use.
Later,
Eric Similar Threads -
By sallearmourer in forum Discussion Archive
Replies: 0
Last Post: 08-21-2002, 12:58 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules |
| |