Hi!
snip below by me.
Quote:
Originally posted by arcon I dont see all the attraction of "Survival"either.
Its probably best for some of us just to live reality and not watch
it.
arcon |
I donīt know about the rules for the usa version of "Survival", but in the orginal (Swedish state television, "Robinson"!) the rules are changed each year, and usually are made so that they present a real challenge to the competitor who tries to win. In just about any sport, even really bad competitors - or even casual onlookers - can in theory figure out how to win. The challenge is actually doing that, and preparing yourself so that you can do it at competition.
Robinson takes this a level further. The starvation and competitions are diffucult enough in their own right. When you throw in the issues of how to vote so as to get an as few and unimportant enemies as possible, which events to mask your capability in so that you will not be voted out early as a threat, then the whole thing gets really complex. It can be thought of as a real-life exercise in game theory, which to me is quite an attraction - more so than looking at scantily cald women on beaches.
Sort of like chess where the rules are changed at irregular intervals, and neither player knows beforehand, or how. Add in starvation, and it is really good to figure out a gameplan.
Then there are the rest of the docu-soaps, but most of them have gone for the bubba viewership by dumping in generous amounts of alcohol, bad sex, etc. and dumbing down the rules. Not fun.
Have a nice time!
Peter Gustafsson