topleft topright

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Jacq-
    Guest

    Re: Is fencing better than Kendo?

    Arrogance is an understatement. Congratulations if you have some talent in
    one area. However, it takes most people at least a year to really understand
    the art and history of fencing. Something you have apparently failed to
    learn. Any sport or martial art will teach you that one: patience is a
    virtue and two humility will go a long way.

    It sounds like a tournament would go a long way in putting that lesson into
    perspective for you.

    FYI, fencing was derived from just the French...check out the schools in
    Germany and Italy and then read a few history books.
    "MattOutland" <mattoutland@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    news:128c14f8.0209131959.18b680ee@posting.google.c om...
    > I think kendo is better. After just a few lessons I am better
    > than most fencers. Just my opininon, but it would make sense
    > since it was devised by battle-hardened samurai instead of
    > sporting Frenchman.
    >
    > Does anyone here take kendo? If so, which is better?




  2. #2
    Phillip Inoy
    Guest

    Re: Is fencing better than Kendo?

    I guess that in a martial context, hmmm how should I put this?

    For starters...what are we comparing kendo to? Foil epee or saber?
    Since Saber allows both stabbing and slashing techniques it would seem
    the most reasonable match up. Also we have to decide whether this is
    on a piste or in the round. On the pist the fencer has considerable
    advantage, in the round kendo/kenjitsu goes along way.

    It hardly seems fair to compare a metal toy with a bamboo one. So lets
    up things a bit and go directly to sharps. Lets substitute the
    courtsword which is somewhat sharpenable along the blade and is tip
    sharp.

    Against a live katana of approx the same length? give similar time of
    training? What foil is today bears litle resemblance to fighting of
    any kind, yet kendo has some more kinship to it, methinks. And then
    there is the quality of a courtsword against a live katana... its not
    good for the courtsword.

    Epee is an interesting one. here its more likely that hand protection
    plays a key role and even things up abit and the weapon itself is more
    heavy duty. If the epeeist can take out or wound a critical target
    such that the kendoka can't move as well then epee should do well but
    thats a tough job considering there really isn't a histroical
    equivalent of epee that was sharpenable along the edges. Its not that
    it wasn't but that history didn't. There's also the strength/leverage
    factor as katanas are two handers. In the end my guess is that its
    possible that an epeeist successfully win against a similarly skilled
    kendoka but that its unlikely. What would likely happen is the epeeist
    would die on the scene but the kendoka if stabbed in the torso would
    die later. If stabbed the kendoka cound still effect an immediately
    fatal blow. Just my guess based on having done both as a sport.
    Actually I'm a foilsman. :-)

    I think a cavalry saber would have the best chances considering the
    similarities of the weapon.

    But as for the question Matt posted; I doubt any of us do this sport
    or kendo to find out which is better. We picked our sport because of
    the aesthetics, fun, fraternity, etc that comes along with it. I
    certainly doubt we picked this or any quasi-martially resembling sport
    for the joy of throwing away lots of money per year just so some
    director can louse it up for us.

    And I doubt we do this so we can wear silly outfits. SCAdians, well
    they do it so that they can SEW silly outfits as well as wear them. I
    know, but I got it rigged. My wife sews them and I wear them.

    As I keep writing I'm starting to become unsure as to why I do this
    ;-p)

    Ohh...I just remembered...its to write shameless plugs for Sam Sigs
    who has the best tiptape I've come across. It's true. :-)

    Phillip J. Inoy





    "Jacq-" <parkertrbl@gci.net> wrote in message news:<vbbkbl3cf91v62@corp.supernews.com>...
    > Arrogance is an understatement. Congratulations if you have some talent in
    > one area. However, it takes most people at least a year to really understand
    > the art and history of fencing. Something you have apparently failed to
    > learn. Any sport or martial art will teach you that one: patience is a
    > virtue and two humility will go a long way.
    >
    > It sounds like a tournament would go a long way in putting that lesson into
    > perspective for you.
    >
    > FYI, fencing was derived from just the French...check out the schools in
    > Germany and Italy and then read a few history books.
    > "MattOutland" <mattoutland@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    > news:128c14f8.0209131959.18b680ee@posting.google.c om...
    > > I think kendo is better. After just a few lessons I am better
    > > than most fencers. Just my opininon, but it would make sense
    > > since it was devised by battle-hardened samurai instead of
    > > sporting Frenchman.
    > >
    > > Does anyone here take kendo? If so, which is better?


Similar Threads

  1. Fencing FAQ (part 3)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Rec Sport Fencing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-20-2011, 09:45 AM
  2. Fencing FAQ (part 1)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Rec Sport Fencing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-26-2005, 02:00 AM
  3. Fencing FAQ (part 1)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-10-2003, 09:33 AM
  4. Fencing FAQ (part 1)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-10-2003, 09:31 AM
  5. Fencing FAQ (part 3)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-10-2003, 09:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30