04-30-2003, 09:27 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Houston/Galveston, Texas, USA
Posts: 578
| Cross Forward in Foil = Yellow Card? I admit I sometimes miss things that everyone else hears about, but...
I was at a local tournament in Houston, Texas. I was due to compete in mixed foil and mixed epee. At the time I arrived, the (earlier) under-14 mixed foil and mixed epee events were nearing an end. The parent of a young man from our club found me and stated his son had received a yellow card for executing a basic cross forward (passe-avance) early in the foil competition.
This was news to me so I checked with the director afterwards (recently relocated to Texas from Poland, she was on the national team there some time back).
She confirmed to me that to cross the back foot forward of the lead foot in foil is now a cardable offense.
I can not fathom the reason for such a rule.
Please tell me epee still allows passe-avance? |
| | | And now for this message... | |
04-30-2003, 09:32 PM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 131
| Re: Cross Forward in Foil = Yellow Card? Quote: Originally posted by schlager7 I admit I sometimes miss things that everyone else hears about, but...
I was at a local tournament in Houston, Texas. I was due to compete in mixed foil and mixed epee. At the time I arrived, the (earlier) under-14 mixed foil and mixed epee events were nearing an end. The parent of a young man from our club found me and stated his son had received a yellow card for executing a basic cross forward (passe-avance) early in the foil competition.
This was news to me so I checked with the director afterwards (recently relocated to Texas from Poland, she was on the national team there some time back).
She confirmed to me that to cross the back foot forward of the lead foot in foil is now a cardable offense.
I can not fathom the reason for such a rule.
Please tell me epee still allows passe-avance? | Thats news to me, I was pretty sure only Sabre had rules regarding crossing... |
| |
04-30-2003, 09:47 PM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,430
| I do recall something about the fleche being eliminated in foil... but i wasn't sure if it was even true or when it was supposed to take effect.
__________________
----------
Andrew
|
| |
04-30-2003, 10:08 PM
|
#4 | | Member
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: USA
Posts: 88
| Wha?? I do cross-overs all the time in competitions...a cardable offense?? 
__________________ athlete /ath'leet/ n.
1. An individual with the gift of an undying passion to be the best and to achieve greatness. |
| |
04-30-2003, 10:15 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2000 Location: Ypsilanti, Mi USA
Posts: 1,592
| Nonsense, people fleche all the time and we'd of definately seen stuff on the USFA web page if such a major change had come into effect. Too bad the kid didn't appeal to the bout commitee he'd of had one less yellow card.  |
| |
04-30-2003, 10:27 PM
|
#6 | | Quit (no longer with us)
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: u.s.a.
Posts: 260
| cross-over/foil They keep trying to mess up fencing. I heard the same thing, check the rule book and also USFA sent out a little cheat sheet.
Don't keep your feet on the ground. |
| |
04-30-2003, 10:51 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 1999 Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 1,245
| IN NJ high school competitions, the fleche is not allowed.
Was this a USFA event?
Paolo
__________________
"He is a man of splendid abilities but utterly corrupt. He shines and stinks like rotten mackerel by moonlight." "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats."
|
| |
05-01-2003, 09:07 AM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Meadville, PA
Posts: 786
| Paolo probably has it right. I too remember (long ago) that NJ high school fencing didn't allow crossing of the feet. It was considered a safety issue. Could a division also institute such a rule for under 14 events?
Tomas |
| |
05-01-2003, 09:20 AM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Way Out West
Posts: 6,098
| It's a pity that cross over is lumped together with fleche. It's perfectly safe to do, and can easily be distinguished from an actual fleche. When I direct HS (also in NJ) I continually have to remind myself that it's not allowed. FWIW, fleche was also not permitted in NY high school competition.
__________________
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different."
|
| |
05-01-2003, 09:30 AM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2000 Location: The Reflecting God
Posts: 4,066
| crossover First I've heard of it. I use it all the time. 
__________________ Whatever doesn't kill you, is gonna leave a scar... |
| |
05-01-2003, 10:01 AM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2000 Location: Michigan
Posts: 606
| I just came from Overland Park and refereed more Y12 & Y14 bouts than I ever wanted. There is NO rule in FOIL that prevents a cross over step. |
| |
05-01-2003, 10:52 AM
|
#12 | | Fencing Expert
Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: CA area
Posts: 7,032
| I too was at Overland Park refereeing foil and epee (on Saturday, I did 1 pool of 7 epee with another referee, one pool of 6 women's foil alone, TWO pools of 7 Y12 MF ALONE, DE of the Y12 MF until the round of 8, 67 5-touch bouts, 9 best 2-out-of-3 DE bouts...boy was my body in pain).
Anyway, the only notice we got from the FOC was clarification on the passivity rule. There were no claims that feet crossing forward in foil is a cardable offense.
I believe the poor referee in that tournament is mistaken, confusing foil with sabre.
__________________ =)=///
|
| |
05-01-2003, 03:13 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Panorama City, ca USA
Posts: 7,947
| A forward cross-over is ONLY illegal in sabre. next time it happens, ask the director to show you the rule in the rule book. if asked, he's obligated to do so. if he refuses, call the bout committee. |
| |
05-01-2003, 04:08 PM
|
#14 | | Armorer
Join Date: Jan 2000 Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,634
| I recall an Escrime International article (possibly one of Rene Roch's editorals) which mentioned the idea of supressing the fleche in foil as it has been done in sabre. Of course, somebody in the FIE mentioning something as an idea is a loooong way from it being a rule.
-Dave |
| |
05-03-2003, 11:56 AM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Australia
Posts: 116
| Is a crossing over on feets no-no it is a llowed. Crossing over of a shoulder-shoulder: HA! No is a for bidden, is a for bidden, getts a yellowish card. NO? 
__________________
Like, go fence , buddy.
|
| |
05-03-2003, 02:05 PM
|
#16 | | Just Joined
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5
| hmmm
that would suck if cross overs were forbidden, or fleches(however you sell them  )
yesterday in my fencing class, we did this 1-point robin thingy and there were those little kids. i kept fleche at them. they somehow forgott to parry each time.
a fleche is where you practicly run at the opponent, right? |
| |
05-04-2003, 06:55 AM
|
#17 | | Unconfirmed
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: N
Posts: 99
| Yeh, that president was talking bull****. |
| |
05-04-2003, 08:04 AM
|
#18 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999 Location: Brooklyn Center, MN, USA
Posts: 465
| Quote: Originally posted by Towelie hmmm
that would suck if cross overs were forbidden, or fleches(however you sell them )
yesterday in my fencing class, we did this 1-point robin thingy and there were those little kids. i kept fleche at them. they somehow forgott to parry each time.
a fleche is where you practicly run at the opponent, right? | A fleche is an attack where you 'dart' towards your opponent; thrusting with both legs, in an action wherein they will crossover . Contrary to what so many people seem to beleive, it does NOT require running, neither before, nor after; IF you have adequate control of you body, you can immediately recover en garde position (using a forward recovery, of course.) 
Last edited by Chris; 05-04-2003 at 08:08 AM..
|
| |
05-04-2003, 11:58 AM
|
#19 | | Fencing Expert
Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: CA area
Posts: 7,032
| A fleche is also not a distance attack. A distance attack might be the pattinando or the ballestra. A fleche should hit before the rear foot touches the ground (at least that was the rule for sabre before the fleche was essentially banned: if the rear foot touches the ground before the hit, the hit was considered a remise).
The advantage of the fleche, primarily in foil, is that it allows one to make a change in direction simply and quickly. If you were to retreat fast and make a lunge, that can be difficult. If you were to retreat fast and make a fleche, it's less difficult.
__________________ =)=///
|
| |
05-04-2003, 07:29 PM
|
#20 | | Quit (no longer with us)
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: u.s.a.
Posts: 260
| The pattinado is back. I like the term better than advance-lunge; only because saying advance lunge doesn't indicate a specific action; it sounds like Advance and then at some point, Lunge. So the pattinado tends to describe one action. Fleche attacks are becoming rare, if you're heavy footed, it's too easy to see in advance, and it has to be a total surprise or it's easily parried. Doing a true fleche, maybe I've done 1/2 dozen in the past, both feet off the ground. The cross over used to be a complete surprise to me, the kids used it all the time in their opening move for epee. That edew for putting perspective on an otherwise obscure topic. |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53 AM. |