Open fencing trials?

[RECON]

[hello?]

You know you have a valid argument when the only thing people can do is comment on you're grammar.

It could also be that people think that you’re argument has all ready been proven wrong and that everyone hear is, quite simply, pretty much board with it. Obviously, as has all ready been stated, you simply herd what you wanted to hear, disregarding the principle objections expressed by the group as a hole. You can, of course, go on believing that you’re write and we’re wrung, if you want too. You don’t have to except our way off thinking. That’s you’re rite – just like we can think that this discussion is pretty much a wonton waist of time.

[t94]

It could also be that people think that you’re argument has all ready been proven wrong and that everyone hear is, quite simply, pretty much board with it. Obviously, as has all ready been stated, you simply herd what you wanted to hear, disregarding the principle objections expressed by the group as a hole. You can, of course, go on believing that you’re write and we’re wrung, if you want too. You don’t have to except our way off thinking. That’s you’re rite – just like we can think that this discussion is pretty much a wonton waist of time.

If it is a waste of time then STOP COMMENTING ON IT!

[tchwojko]

If it is a waste of time then STOP COMMENTING ON IT!

hello? win.

[Alexander Kai]

If it is a waste of time then STOP COMMENTING ON IT!

I agree with tchwojko. Hello?'s comment is a win =D

Also, I would like to inform you of rule #2 of f.net. The threads which you want to die never will.

[erik_blank]

Also, I would like to inform you of rule #2 of f.net. The threads which you want to die never will.

With an axe?

[Alexander Kai]

I suppose we have one buried somewhere here. Though I think at some point someone will sharpen their old cavalry sabre and have at it.