topleft topright

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26
  1. #1
    Senior Member Array vigia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    135

    Referees Required to Call Actions?

    I was at a tournament this weekend, and the director would only raise one hand or the other and declare a touch. When asked (politely) to explain the action, he refused. Is this permissible?

  2. #2
    Senior Member Array damianip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    PA, USA
    Posts
    1,400
    Which weapon?

    Paolo
    "He is a man of splendid abilities but utterly corrupt. He shines and stinks like rotten mackerel by moonlight." "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats."

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array vigia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    135
    Originally posted by damianip
    Which weapon?

    Paolo
    Sabre. It was at a Junior World Cup in Canada.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array damianip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    PA, USA
    Posts
    1,400
    Originally posted by vigia
    Sabre. It was at a Junior World Cup in Canada.
    Well then, I would think that they are indeed required to call the action.

    However, I have seen "leisurely" directors not re-call the phrase on one light actions.

    It seems strange to me that this would happen at a WC.

    Paolo
    "He is a man of splendid abilities but utterly corrupt. He shines and stinks like rotten mackerel by moonlight." "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats."

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array damianip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    PA, USA
    Posts
    1,400
    From the US rules (mostly taken from the FIE rules):

    t.42 As soon as the bout has stopped, the Referee briefly analyzes the
    actions that compose the final phrase d'armes.
    For finals, the Referee may make use of a television monitor to check
    decisions should he or she be uncertain.
    After reaching his decision regarding the materiality of a touch, the
    Referee, by applying the rules, decides to which fencer a touch is to be
    awarded, whether both are touched (épée) or if there is no valid touch
    (cf. t.55ss, t.64ss, t.74ss).
    The Referee would use the following gestures (see Figure 3, p. 16).
    Paolo
    "He is a man of splendid abilities but utterly corrupt. He shines and stinks like rotten mackerel by moonlight." "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats."

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array vigia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    135
    Originally posted by damianip
    Well then, I would think that they are indeed required to call the action.

    However, I have seen "leisurely" directors not re-call the phrase on one light actions.

    It seems strange to me that this would happen at a WC.

    Paolo
    Refused. Two lights would go off, he'd raise one hand, end of discussion. Shook his head "no" the first time he was asked. Threatened a card the second time.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array damianip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    PA, USA
    Posts
    1,400
    Time to call the bout committee!!!!

    It's kind of hard to fence a director who won't let you know what he/she is thinking.

    Paolo
    "He is a man of splendid abilities but utterly corrupt. He shines and stinks like rotten mackerel by moonlight." "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats."

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array vigia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    135
    Originally posted by damianip
    From the US rules (mostly taken from the FIE rules):

    Paolo
    But nowhere does it say that the director has to say it out loud. He/she has to analyse and come to a decision. Then it *suggests* hand motions. So maybe it isn't required to explain it.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array vigia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    135
    Originally posted by damianip
    Time to call the bout committee!!!!

    It's kind of hard to fence a director who won't let you know what he/she is thinking.

    Paolo
    Except that of course you don't want to piss this guy off any worse than is necessary, since he will probably be directing later on and you could get him in your DE's...

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array damianip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    PA, USA
    Posts
    1,400
    Originally posted by vigia
    But nowhere does it say that the director has to say it out loud. He/she has to analyse and come to a decision. Then it *suggests* hand motions. So maybe it isn't required to explain it.
    I believe that this phrase:

    "As soon as the bout has stopped, the Referee briefly analyzes the actions that compose the final phrase d'armes."

    implies that the analysis is for "public consumption"

    However, the hand signals, executed properly are pretty clear, especially since there is now a "parry" hand signal.

    http://www.fie.ch/reglement/GESTES%2...ARBITRAGE1.pdf

    and

    http://www.fie.ch/reglement/GESTES%2...ARBITRAGE2.pdf

    Did the director use hand signals?

    Paolo
    "He is a man of splendid abilities but utterly corrupt. He shines and stinks like rotten mackerel by moonlight." "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats."

  11. #11
    Quit (no longer with us) Array 135711's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    1,307
    Originally posted by damianip
    From the US rules (mostly taken from the FIE rules):



    Paolo

    it does not say that the ref has to analyze the action out loud. i understand, sometimes i go on mute also. according to some people we all SHOULD be able to recite lengthly explanations, but it sometimes invites debate.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Array epeemike81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Chestnut Hill, MA
    Posts
    4,785
    regardless of legality, it is rather appalling that you came across this at a world cup.

    -m

  13. #13
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    34,479
    On the WC sabre tape I have been watching, the vast majority seem to use gestures almost entirely, with occasional verbal addenda such as "pas de touche".

    I imagine that the presumption is that at this level the fencers will be able to distill all they need to know from the hand signals. Very few actions are so complicated that these prove inadequate to the task...

    Probably speeds things along immensely, too...

  14. #14
    Senior Member Array epeemike81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Chestnut Hill, MA
    Posts
    4,785
    Originally posted by Inquartata
    On the WC sabre tape I have been watching, the vast majority seem to use gestures almost entirely, with occasional verbal addenda such as "pas de touche".

    I imagine that the presumption is that at this level the fencers will be able to distill all they need to know from the hand signals. Very few actions are so complicated that these prove inadequate to the task...

    Probably speeds things along immensely, too...
    I was under the impression that this ref didn't even use hand signals, but maybe I'm wrong.

    Vigia, how bout it?

    -m

  15. #15
    Fencing Expert Array veeco's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    The valley of the -hot- sun, NorCal
    Posts
    3,185
    Originally posted by Inquartata
    On the WC sabre tape I have been watching, the vast majority seem to use gestures almost entirely, with occasional verbal addenda such as "pas de touche".

    I imagine that the presumption is that at this level the fencers will be able to distill all they need to know from the hand signals. Very few actions are so complicated that these prove inadequate to the task...

    Probably speeds things along immensely, too...
    Maybe, but this was a Junior world cup where the educational value of this analysis has to be kept in mind.

    Plus there did not seem to be such a big amount of competitors to warrant the use of time saving measures.
    • Epee is the Louis Vuitton bag of fencing: only the best can get it, and the rest of the masses must content themselves with cheap knockoffs (sabre, foil)
    • To not recognize the power of the French grip is to be in denial

  16. #16
    Senior Member Array Boo Boo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    785
    At the World Cups I have been to (foil), refs have always used both vocal phrasing (in French) and comprehensive hand signals.

    Its absolutely awful if your ref did not vocally phrase what he is calling. A ref would not get away with it at a FIE refereeing exam...

    Out of interest, were most of his calls (i.e. to which fencer he awrded the hit) correct?

    Boo

  17. #17
    Armorer Array sallearmourer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Moutain Home ID
    Posts
    594
    When I referee sabre, I have been told I talk too much and to keep it to the bare min. To use hand signals more. Has the more you talk the more chance of the fencers potesting a called. So now I used nothing but hand signals.


    Tim
    People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    George Orwell


    www.yeoldearmourer.com

  18. #18
    Senior Member Array vigia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    135
    Originally posted by epeemike81
    I was under the impression that this ref didn't even use hand signals, but maybe I'm wrong.

    Vigia, how bout it?

    -m
    No hand signals.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Array vigia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    135
    Originally posted by Boo Boo

    Out of interest, were most of his calls (i.e. to which fencer he awrded the hit) correct?

    Boo
    Well, that's always debatable! The US fencer lost, so of course the calls were wrong. <g>. In all honesty they did look predjudicial to me, but I'm not always correct by any stretch either.

    From other posts I've read over time about World Cup referreeing, I was just chalking it up to "welcome to international competition."

  20. #20
    pkt
    pkt is offline
    Senior Member Array pkt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, the WET coast of Canada
    Posts
    1,979
    Vigia,

    I think you should file a complaint to the FIE as well as the CFF.
    CFF:
    http://fencing.ca/english_index.html
    direct your email to the Technical director who may want o pass on your complaint to the FIE...

    If for no other reason than to have them investigate this ref's aberrant behaviour.

    PK

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Paying the referees
    By Tomas N in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 09-07-2005, 09:30 AM
  2. coupé with PIL? and how would you honestly call this situation.
    By angrylemur in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 02-17-2003, 07:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30