Scoring Box Setting - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > General Fencing > Armory - Q&A

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2003, 01:17 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
I see dead people's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 204
I see dead people has a spectacular aura aboutI see dead people has a spectacular aura aboutI see dead people has a spectacular aura about
Scoring Box Setting

Something is really bothering me: almost all of the boxes in every club I have been to were set to 700ms for foil and 500ms for sabre for the cut-off time between touches.

Most fencers simply shrug it off and thinking it doesn't effect their games. But I think it matters!! They all should be set according to the FIE specification of 300 ms for both foil and sabre. For sabre it is almost 50% of difference, and for foil it is more than 200% of difference!!

For foil, I don't think the fencers in the US are even playing the same game as the other fencers in the rest of the world. And, maybe that's why we are not doing so well in international competitions.

So for you club armourers, please update your machines already. If your machines are not updatable, then it is probably time for a little upgrade.
I see dead people is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 01-21-2003, 02:24 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Agent_V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 247
Agent_V is a glorious beacon of lightAgent_V is a glorious beacon of lightAgent_V is a glorious beacon of lightAgent_V is a glorious beacon of lightAgent_V is a glorious beacon of light
Uhhh, last time I heard anything, setting foil and sabre to 300ms was simply a recommendation being acted upon by an exploratory commitee - not at all an FIE rule.
-Alexander
Agent_V is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2003, 12:01 PM   #3
Armorer
 
DHCJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Beach, CA / Las Vegas
Posts: 3,331
DHCJr has a reputation beyond reputeDHCJr has a reputation beyond reputeDHCJr has a reputation beyond reputeDHCJr has a reputation beyond reputeDHCJr has a reputation beyond reputeDHCJr has a reputation beyond reputeDHCJr has a reputation beyond reputeDHCJr has a reputation beyond reputeDHCJr has a reputation beyond reputeDHCJr has a reputation beyond reputeDHCJr has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Scoring Box Setting

Quote:
Originally posted by I see dead people
Something is really bothering me: almost all of the boxes in every club I have been to were set to 700ms for foil and 500ms for sabre for the cut-off time between touches.

Most fencers simply shrug it off and thinking it doesn't effect their games. But I think it matters!! They all should be set according to the FIE specification of 300 ms for both foil and sabre. For sabre it is almost 50% of difference, and for foil it is more than 200% of difference!!

For foil, I don't think the fencers in the US are even playing the same game as the other fencers in the rest of the world. And, maybe that's why we are not doing so well in international competitions.

So for you club armourers, please update your machines already. If your machines are not updatable, then it is probably time for a little upgrade.
I think you should be sure of the rules before you complain. From the A) Foil section for Apparatus, rule 1a7 the cutoff must be set for between 700 and 800 milliseconds. If the box had been set for 300 as you suggested then it would be wrong. Now the Sabre circuit is a problem. From the C) Sabre section, rule a8 the cutout should be set at 300 to 350 milliseconds. These rules are in both the latest USFA and FIE rule books online.
__________________
Donald Hollis Clinton, Jr.
DHCJr@juno.com

To Teach is to Learn (Japanese Proverb)

Knowing the rule book by heart means nothing, if you don't understand the rules.
DHCJr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2003, 05:27 PM   #4
Armorer
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,624
neevel is a splendid one to beholdneevel is a splendid one to beholdneevel is a splendid one to beholdneevel is a splendid one to beholdneevel is a splendid one to beholdneevel is a splendid one to beholdneevel is a splendid one to behold
The FIE has not yet made any actions on the proposal of shortening the lockout time-- the values that Don qouted from the rulebook are the current specification. There are lots of proposals that get put up to the FIE for consideration, the majority of which never come to pass.

There are some recent boxes (e.g., the Eigertek) on which that lockout time is adjustable to accomodate any changes to that parameter that may end up being made, and to allow people to experiment with it. Having done so, I can tell you that it really doesn't make all that much difference-- you will not be able to "time out" your opponent's attacks with a conterattack substantially better than with the current timing. An effective stop-hit/AIP against an opponent making a good attack has to be set up properly-- if you simply jut-and-lunge into your opponent's final motion you will be too late, regardless of whether the lockout time is 0.3 second or 0.7 second.

The two main effects I've noticed from the shorter lockout time are:

1) Late remises will be blocked out-- this really doesn't have much of an effect on bout outcomes, but it could be argued that it makes things a little clearer for spectators since it'll be less likely that both sides will have a light on due to someone taking a last jab after already being touched.

2) When not on grounded strips, referees will have to start remembering the "voluntary touch not on opponent" rule, since it will be easier for those so inclined to block out an incoming compound attack by dunking their point into the floor.

-Dave
neevel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2003, 05:57 PM   #5
Admin
 
Craig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,406
Craig has a reputation beyond reputeCraig has a reputation beyond reputeCraig has a reputation beyond reputeCraig has a reputation beyond reputeCraig has a reputation beyond reputeCraig has a reputation beyond reputeCraig has a reputation beyond reputeCraig has a reputation beyond reputeCraig has a reputation beyond reputeCraig has a reputation beyond reputeCraig has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Craig Send a message via Skype™ to Craig
Quote:
2) When not on grounded strips, referees will have to start remembering the "voluntary touch not on opponent" rule, since it will be easier for those so inclined to block out an incoming compound attack by dunking their point into the floor.
That will be an interesting thing to look out for...
__________________
Webmaster - Fencing.Net


Subscribe to the Fencing Podcast (via FeedBurner, or just search for Fencing on the iTunes podcast directory.)
Craig is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fencing FAQ (part 1) Morgan Burke Rec Sport Fencing 2 08-26-2005 02:00 AM
Fencing FAQ (part 2) Morgan Burke Fencing Discussion 0 03-10-2003 09:33 AM
Team scoring for high school competitions? Harold Buck Fencing Discussion 1 03-10-2003 09:32 AM
Fencing FAQ (part 2) Morgan Burke Fencing Discussion 0 03-10-2003 09:31 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 AM.


(c) 1995 - 2007 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 -    Medieval Swords from the online Replica Sword Shop