fencerbill@aol.com (Fencerbill) wrote in
<20021222224042.07882.00000271@mb-mr.aol.com>:
>I am on a personal crusade against some of the least expensive masks
>that consist of only an outer layer, foam and a flimsy inner layer.
>If the outer layer develops a hole, or a seam opens, there is nothing
>between your throat but foam and the liner. One characteristic of
>these masks is that they are very light. That may seem like an
>advantage but it also means an absolute minimum of protection
>
>I am not mentioning brand names, just examine the mask.
I think it would be useful to mention the brand names. If (as is the case
with many people) the only way to buy fencing gear is online, it doesn't
do much good to say "look at the mask." Sure, you can look at the masks
other people are wearing at the club, but they might not have a wide
range of styles, or they might be old ones that aren't manufactured now.
I have never been squeamish about saying the brand names of products or
companies whose products I don't like or don't think are well made. By
making and advertising their product, they put themselves in the public
spotlight; it's not like we're unjustly "dissing" the product if there
are specific reasons not to like it. If a company is making masks that
people feel are unsafe, it's to everyone's best interest in the end that
the subject be discussed openly.
In my personal experience, I don't care for the low-end Santelli masks,
because in the ones I've seen, the bib is very short, and in my opinion
doesn't provide enough of an overlap with the jacket collar to be really
safe. On the other hand, I've been happy with the Triplette (mid-range)
and Blue Gauntlet (basic) foil masks I've owned, as they've seemed
decently solid with good bibs.
--Holly