-
Senior Member
Array More government oversight Since we're a little off the original topic anyway: http://www.federaltimes.com/article/...3/2080301/1001
The White House's 2011 budget proposal will "rebalance" the relationship between the government and its contractors through more oversight and insourcing, the Obama administration's top procurement policy official said last week.

Performing Happy Snoopy Dance.
YES!!!!
The budget would add nearly 20,000 new civilian and military billets to Defense Department payrolls next year to perform work now done by contractors. Nearly 5,000 of those positions will perform contract support services, according to the budget. Those 5,000 positions will be part of an overall 10,025-person increase in the department's acquisition workforce next year, according to the budget.
-
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by Bayou Bum That's the way it is now  You are usually right about everything. However this is where you are wrong. Wake up and drop the epee. Be a man. Bury socialist healthcare with Ted Kennedy.
Cutting liberals down to size is my business, and business is GOOD. -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by lindajdunn So you are excited about MORE Obama-style government interference? Bury socialist healthcare with Ted Kennedy.
Cutting liberals down to size is my business, and business is GOOD. -
Senior Member
Array Is first step toward glorious revolution!
Why do you think there are so many Russians involved in US fencing? They're biding their time before the great rise of the proletariat! -
Senior Member
Array When Revolution come, mek chase first against wall. Is order of Politburo. Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo,
Aureli pathetice et cinaede Furi -
Senior Member
Array And if Chase isn't a sock puppet... and is still looking for that good-paying job, he might want to consider a career in acquisition management.
Here's an example: http://jobview.usajobs.gov/GetJob.as...9+03%3a23%3a00
40,093.00 - 169,504.00 USD /year
Please note that the actual salary will be based on grade level, job location, and the HR system (e.g., GS, DEMO, NSPS).
Educational requirements are basically:
A bachelor's degree from an accredited educational institution authorized to grant baccalaureate degrees, and at least 24 semester hours in any combination of the following fields: accounting, business, finance, law, contracts, purchasing, economics, industrial management, marketing, quantitative methods, or organization and management. (This requirement can be obtained within the bachelor's degree or in addition to the degree.)
Of course Chase, if he's a living person and not a sock puppet, could use this position as a stepping stone. -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by lindajdunn There is no way that I will ever work for the federal government. Taking the money of the unwilling is wrong. Bury socialist healthcare with Ted Kennedy.
Cutting liberals down to size is my business, and business is GOOD. -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by chase There is no way that I will ever work for the federal government. Taking the money of the unwilling is wrong. Why would you disrespect all of the men and women in the military that are dying for your freedom? "There is a fine line between clever and stupid" David St. Hubbins -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by jessicasimpson Why would you disrespect all of the men and women in the military that are dying for your freedom? Oh snap! -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by jessicasimpson Why would you disrespect all of the men and women in the military that are dying for your freedom? The military was an implied exception. Any sane person does not want to live under a caliphate (BHO supporters are the obvious exception), so I, like every other sane person, am completely willing to pay taxes to support our troops. But that is ALL I want to pay for, not for some crack-head's welfare stamps. Bury socialist healthcare with Ted Kennedy.
Cutting liberals down to size is my business, and business is GOOD. -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by chase The military was an implied exception. Any sane person does not want to live under a caliphate (BHO supporters are the obvious exception), so I, like every other sane person, am completely willing to pay taxes to support our troops. But that is ALL I want to pay for, not for some crack-head's welfare stamps. What about civilian employees of the military, such as the position that Linda linked for you? Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
~
^[:wq -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by migopod What about civilian employees of the military, such as the position that Linda linked for you? Indeed. Most of the 1102s that I know oversee military contractors, insuring that our troops have the equipment they need that meets specs, arrives on schedule, and works properly. Some of them even volunteer to serve overseas for months at a time.
This confirms it for me. Chase is a sock puppet. And a troll.
Back to averting my eyes whenever anyone quotes something he posted. [I've got his posts blocked.] -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by chase The military was an implied exception. Any sane person does not want to live under a caliphate (BHO supporters are the obvious exception), so I, like every other sane person, am completely willing to pay taxes to support our troops. But that is ALL I want to pay for, not for some crack-head's welfare stamps. I wish I could just pay taxes to the part I agree with. Maybe we should have an order form attached to our tax returns so we can choose what to support. -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by chase ....But that is ALL I want to pay for, not for some crack-head's welfare stamps. Hey Inq. This is another fine example of racist dog whistling. Crackheads on welfare is code for providing government assistance to lazy, irresponsible black people. Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
~
^[:wq -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by chase The military was an implied exception. Any sane person does not want to live under a caliphate (BHO supporters are the obvious exception), so I, like every other sane person, am completely willing to pay taxes to support our troops. But that is ALL I want to pay for, not for some crack-head's welfare stamps. Chase, I've heard you make references to your "tax dollars" and how they're being spent by the federal government on several occasions. How much taxes do you pay to the federal government? I don't want to pry but are we talking about 3 figures? 4 figures? 0 figure?
. -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by WGH I wish I could just pay taxes to the part I agree with. Maybe we should have an order form attached to our tax returns so we can choose what to support. There is one tiny instance where we get to do just that. Live every week like it's Shark Week. -
 Originally Posted by chase There is no way that I will ever work for the federal government. Taking the money of the unwilling is wrong. I guess I have a question about attending the University of Texas at Austin. It seems to get about $340 million federal dollars.
Is this willing money? -
Curmudgeon Emeritus
Array  Originally Posted by lindajdunn
The White House's 2011 budget proposal will "rebalance" the relationship between the government and its contractors through more oversight and insourcing, the Obama administration's top procurement policy official said last week.
Performing Happy Snoopy Dance.
YES!!!!
Meh, in the same way his administration eliminated the hiring of lobbyists, closed Gunatanamo, ended US troop involvement in Iraq, stopped the use of warrantless wiretaps, etc?
Don't hold your breath while you're dancing.   Originally Posted by migopod Hey Inq. This is another fine example of racist dog whistling. Crackheads on welfare is code for providing government assistance to lazy, irresponsible black people. Why, exactly?
Are you saying that there are no whites, Hispanics, Asians, American Indians, or other ethicities who use crack or receive welfare? Only blacks do these things?
RACIST! Use the Shift key, people! Keyboard manufacturers everywhere are ineffably saddened when you ignore what they made just for you! -
Senior Member
Array http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog-whistle_politics
Overt racism is harder to get away with than in the Good Old Days when everybody "knew their place". It has to be carefully coded now. Nudge-nudge, wink-wink.
"plausible deniability" - it's not just for the CIA anymore! "In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different." -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by Inquartata Why, exactly?
Are you saying that there are no whites, Hispanics, Asians, American Indians, or other ethicities who use crack or receive welfare? Only blacks do these things?
RACIST!  See, it's not about truth. It's about appealing to stereotypes with a wink and then if they're called out on it they can say "What, that wasn't racist. White poor people can do crack too!"
Of course if they had meant white people they would have referred to "meth heads" on food stamps. To be more inclusive even it would have been "drug users".
The point is that crack use is associated in the popular consciousness as a black thing. Add in welfare and it's complete. Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
~
^[:wq Similar Threads -
By SenorEquis in forum Fencing Discussion
Replies: 22
Last Post: 04-01-2009, 12:59 PM -
By Dieter Schlaepfer in forum Rec Sport Fencing
Replies: 0
Last Post: 02-21-2005, 02:28 PM -
By D'Artag-NOT in forum Fencing Discussion
Replies: 32
Last Post: 11-09-2004, 12:02 PM -
By Dieter Schlaepfer in forum Rec Sport Fencing
Replies: 0
Last Post: 12-30-2003, 07:00 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules |