topleft topright

Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 187
  1. #41
    Senior Member Array lindajdunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,820
    Blog Entries
    798

    More government oversight

    Since we're a little off the original topic anyway:

    http://www.federaltimes.com/article/...3/2080301/1001

    The White House's 2011 budget proposal will "rebalance" the relationship between the government and its contractors through more oversight and insourcing, the Obama administration's top procurement policy official said last week.


    Performing Happy Snoopy Dance.

    YES!!!!
    The budget would add nearly 20,000 new civilian and military billets to Defense Department payrolls next year to perform work now done by contractors. Nearly 5,000 of those positions will perform contract support services, according to the budget. Those 5,000 positions will be part of an overall 10,025-person increase in the department's acquisition workforce next year, according to the budget.

  2. #42
    Senior Member Array chase's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    439
    Quote Originally Posted by Bayou Bum View Post
    That's the way it is now
    You are usually right about everything. However this is where you are wrong. Wake up and drop the epee. Be a man.
    Bury socialist healthcare with Ted Kennedy.

    Cutting liberals down to size is my business, and business is GOOD.

  3. #43
    Senior Member Array chase's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    439

    Thumbs Down

    Quote Originally Posted by lindajdunn View Post
    Since we're a little off the original topic anyway:

    http://www.federaltimes.com/article/...3/2080301/1001




    Performing Happy Snoopy Dance.

    YES!!!!
    So you are excited about MORE Obama-style government interference?
    Bury socialist healthcare with Ted Kennedy.

    Cutting liberals down to size is my business, and business is GOOD.

  4. #44
    WGH
    WGH is offline
    Senior Member Array WGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    546
    Is first step toward glorious revolution!

    Why do you think there are so many Russians involved in US fencing? They're biding their time before the great rise of the proletariat!

  5. #45
    Senior Member Array telkanuru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    7,976
    When Revolution come, mek chase first against wall. Is order of Politburo.
    Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo,
    Aureli pathetice et cinaede Furi

  6. #46
    Senior Member Array lindajdunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,820
    Blog Entries
    798

    And if Chase isn't a sock puppet...

    and is still looking for that good-paying job, he might want to consider a career in acquisition management.

    Here's an example:


    http://jobview.usajobs.gov/GetJob.as...9+03%3a23%3a00


    40,093.00 - 169,504.00 USD /year
    Please note that the actual salary will be based on grade level, job location, and the HR system (e.g., GS, DEMO, NSPS).
    Educational requirements are basically:

    A bachelor's degree from an accredited educational institution authorized to grant baccalaureate degrees, and at least 24 semester hours in any combination of the following fields: accounting, business, finance, law, contracts, purchasing, economics, industrial management, marketing, quantitative methods, or organization and management. (This requirement can be obtained within the bachelor's degree or in addition to the degree.)

    Of course Chase, if he's a living person and not a sock puppet, could use this position as a stepping stone.

  7. #47
    Senior Member Array chase's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    439
    Quote Originally Posted by lindajdunn View Post
    and is still looking for that good-paying job, he might want to consider a career in acquisition management.

    Here's an example:


    http://jobview.usajobs.gov/GetJob.as...9+03%3a23%3a00

    .
    There is no way that I will ever work for the federal government. Taking the money of the unwilling is wrong.
    Bury socialist healthcare with Ted Kennedy.

    Cutting liberals down to size is my business, and business is GOOD.

  8. #48
    Senior Member Array jessicasimpson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    673
    Quote Originally Posted by chase View Post
    There is no way that I will ever work for the federal government. Taking the money of the unwilling is wrong.
    Why would you disrespect all of the men and women in the military that are dying for your freedom?
    "There is a fine line between clever and stupid" David St. Hubbins

  9. #49
    WGH
    WGH is offline
    Senior Member Array WGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    546
    Quote Originally Posted by jessicasimpson View Post
    Why would you disrespect all of the men and women in the military that are dying for your freedom?
    Oh snap!

  10. #50
    Senior Member Array chase's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    439
    Quote Originally Posted by jessicasimpson View Post
    Why would you disrespect all of the men and women in the military that are dying for your freedom?
    The military was an implied exception. Any sane person does not want to live under a caliphate (BHO supporters are the obvious exception), so I, like every other sane person, am completely willing to pay taxes to support our troops. But that is ALL I want to pay for, not for some crack-head's welfare stamps.
    Bury socialist healthcare with Ted Kennedy.

    Cutting liberals down to size is my business, and business is GOOD.

  11. #51
    Senior Member Array migopod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    MKE WI
    Posts
    3,006
    Quote Originally Posted by chase View Post
    The military was an implied exception. Any sane person does not want to live under a caliphate (BHO supporters are the obvious exception), so I, like every other sane person, am completely willing to pay taxes to support our troops. But that is ALL I want to pay for, not for some crack-head's welfare stamps.
    What about civilian employees of the military, such as the position that Linda linked for you?
    Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
    ~
    ^[:wq

  12. #52
    Senior Member Array lindajdunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,820
    Blog Entries
    798
    Quote Originally Posted by migopod View Post
    What about civilian employees of the military, such as the position that Linda linked for you?
    Indeed. Most of the 1102s that I know oversee military contractors, insuring that our troops have the equipment they need that meets specs, arrives on schedule, and works properly. Some of them even volunteer to serve overseas for months at a time.

    This confirms it for me. Chase is a sock puppet. And a troll.

    Back to averting my eyes whenever anyone quotes something he posted. [I've got his posts blocked.]

  13. #53
    WGH
    WGH is offline
    Senior Member Array WGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    546
    Quote Originally Posted by chase View Post
    The military was an implied exception. Any sane person does not want to live under a caliphate (BHO supporters are the obvious exception), so I, like every other sane person, am completely willing to pay taxes to support our troops. But that is ALL I want to pay for, not for some crack-head's welfare stamps.
    I wish I could just pay taxes to the part I agree with. Maybe we should have an order form attached to our tax returns so we can choose what to support.

  14. #54
    Senior Member Array migopod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    MKE WI
    Posts
    3,006
    Quote Originally Posted by chase View Post
    ....But that is ALL I want to pay for, not for some crack-head's welfare stamps.
    Hey Inq. This is another fine example of racist dog whistling. Crackheads on welfare is code for providing government assistance to lazy, irresponsible black people.
    Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
    ~
    ^[:wq

  15. #55
    Senior Member Array Fiat Slug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    305
    Quote Originally Posted by chase View Post
    The military was an implied exception. Any sane person does not want to live under a caliphate (BHO supporters are the obvious exception), so I, like every other sane person, am completely willing to pay taxes to support our troops. But that is ALL I want to pay for, not for some crack-head's welfare stamps.
    Chase, I've heard you make references to your "tax dollars" and how they're being spent by the federal government on several occasions. How much taxes do you pay to the federal government? I don't want to pry but are we talking about 3 figures? 4 figures? 0 figure?

    .

  16. #56
    Senior Member Array Guided by Wire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    284
    Quote Originally Posted by WGH View Post
    I wish I could just pay taxes to the part I agree with. Maybe we should have an order form attached to our tax returns so we can choose what to support.
    There is one tiny instance where we get to do just that.
    Live every week like it's Shark Week.

  17. #57
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Posts
    2,216
    Quote Originally Posted by chase View Post
    There is no way that I will ever work for the federal government. Taking the money of the unwilling is wrong.
    I guess I have a question about attending the University of Texas at Austin. It seems to get about $340 million federal dollars.

    Is this willing money?

  18. #58
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    34,479
    Quote Originally Posted by lindajdunn View Post

    The White House's 2011 budget proposal will "rebalance" the relationship between the government and its contractors through more oversight and insourcing, the Obama administration's top procurement policy official said last week.


    Performing Happy Snoopy Dance.

    YES!!!!

    Meh, in the same way his administration eliminated the hiring of lobbyists, closed Gunatanamo, ended US troop involvement in Iraq, stopped the use of warrantless wiretaps, etc?

    Don't hold your breath while you're dancing.

    Quote Originally Posted by migopod View Post
    Hey Inq. This is another fine example of racist dog whistling. Crackheads on welfare is code for providing government assistance to lazy, irresponsible black people.
    Why, exactly?

    Are you saying that there are no whites, Hispanics, Asians, American Indians, or other ethicities who use crack or receive welfare? Only blacks do these things?

    RACIST!
    Use the Shift key, people! Keyboard manufacturers everywhere are ineffably saddened when you ignore what they made just for you!

  19. #59
    Senior Member Array jeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    It's a dry heat
    Posts
    6,725
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog-whistle_politics

    Overt racism is harder to get away with than in the Good Old Days when everybody "knew their place". It has to be carefully coded now. Nudge-nudge, wink-wink.

    "plausible deniability" - it's not just for the CIA anymore!
    "In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different."

  20. #60
    Senior Member Array migopod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    MKE WI
    Posts
    3,006
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata View Post
    Why, exactly?

    Are you saying that there are no whites, Hispanics, Asians, American Indians, or other ethicities who use crack or receive welfare? Only blacks do these things?

    RACIST!
    See, it's not about truth. It's about appealing to stereotypes with a wink and then if they're called out on it they can say "What, that wasn't racist. White poor people can do crack too!"

    Of course if they had meant white people they would have referred to "meth heads" on food stamps. To be more inclusive even it would have been "drug users".

    The point is that crack use is associated in the popular consciousness as a black thing. Add in welfare and it's complete.
    Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
    ~
    ^[:wq

Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Liability for Equipment Owners
    By SenorEquis in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-01-2009, 12:59 PM
  2. Attention Eclipse Owners
    By Dieter Schlaepfer in forum Rec Sport Fencing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-21-2005, 02:28 PM
  3. Smug Winner
    By D'Artag-NOT in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 11-09-2004, 12:02 PM
  4. Attention Eclipse Owners
    By Dieter Schlaepfer in forum Rec Sport Fencing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-30-2003, 07:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30