White house goes after Fox News - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > General Fencing > Water Cooler > Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-19-2009, 01:43 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,347
Slim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond repute
White house goes after Fox News

Not surprising really. This administration attacks any and all that don't agree with them and their policies.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theworldnew...can-party.html

http://www.businessinsider.com/white...t-news-2009-10

As I've continued to say, the administration no more than a bunch of bush league amateurs. They probably just increased Fox's ratings. This should be good.

I guess Fox isn't news, but NBC, MSNBC and CNN all are? Hahaha. Thin skinned liberals with their panties all twisted again.

Watch out for that vast right wing conspiracy. Gonna getcha.
__________________
Truth is Liberal.
Slim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 10-19-2009, 03:55 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
migopod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 526
migopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to migopod
I would have called that as:

Attack from the right is parried. Riposte from the left arrives.
__________________
Does it sound logical that I would talk about the mother of a big white guy with a gun?

^[:wq
migopod is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 03:58 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 824
Fechter1 has a reputation beyond reputeFechter1 has a reputation beyond reputeFechter1 has a reputation beyond reputeFechter1 has a reputation beyond reputeFechter1 has a reputation beyond reputeFechter1 has a reputation beyond reputeFechter1 has a reputation beyond reputeFechter1 has a reputation beyond reputeFechter1 has a reputation beyond reputeFechter1 has a reputation beyond reputeFechter1 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Fechter1
Quote:
Originally Posted by migopod View Post
I would have called that as:

Attack from the right is parried. Riposte from the left arrives.
If I could rep you, I would.
Fechter1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 04:03 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,347
Slim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by migopod View Post
I would have called that as:

Attack from the right is parried. Riposte from the left arrives.
Heh. Clever, but not quite. More like constant whining about bad calls.
__________________
Truth is Liberal.
Slim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 04:07 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Way Out West
Posts: 5,707
jeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fechter1 View Post
If I could rep you, I would.
Me too.

Speaking of "bush league", GWB attacked the New York Times as partisan too. It seems that presidential complaints about unfair coverage is perennial.

What makes the Fox incident stand out is how brazen they are with their shows. Tune in almost any time (unless they're tracking Balloon Boy), and you'll have talking heads sharing hard hitting analysis - "Doesn't Obama suck?" "Why yes you're right, he does". Or Glen Beck saying that Obama has a deep seated hatred of white people, and holding 2-hour program events to promote teabag parties. Or Hannity "interviewing" Coulter.

Is it a conspiracy if it's not a secret?
__________________
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different."
jeff is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 04:15 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,347
Slim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff View Post
Me too.

Speaking of "bush league", GWB attacked the New York Times as partisan too. It seems that presidential complaints about unfair coverage is perennial.

What makes the Fox incident stand out is how brazen they are with their shows. Tune in almost any time (unless they're tracking Balloon Boy), and you'll have talking heads sharing hard hitting analysis - "Doesn't Obama suck?" "Why yes you're right, he does". Or Glen Beck saying that Obama has a deep seated hatred of white people, and holding 2-hour program events to promote teabag parties. Or Hannity "interviewing" Coulter.

Is it a conspiracy if it's not a secret?
Clearly you have not been watching any MSNBC or CNN. To try and say one is worse than the other is total rubbish.

They're all the same.
__________________
Truth is Liberal.
Slim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 04:22 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Way Out West
Posts: 5,707
jeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond repute
I don't watch MSNBC, so can't comment on it.

I do watch CNN, and it's clearly a news organization, rather than a sounding board for one political party. I've seen their commentators and guest speakers make editorial comments praising and smacking all sides. If you can't see the difference between them and Fox then you're completely blind.

Larry King really irritates me, though. That should count.
__________________
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different."
jeff is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 04:37 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
migopod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 526
migopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to migopod
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff View Post
I don't watch MSNBC, so can't comment on it.

I do watch CNN, and it's clearly a news organization, rather than a sounding board for one political party. I've seen their commentators and guest speakers make editorial comments praising and smacking all sides. If you can't see the difference between them and Fox then you're completely blind.

Larry King really irritates me, though. That should count.
My experience with MSNBC is limited to TRMS and Countdown. They are leftish political opinion shows. Unlike Fox news however, they do not claim to be "fair and balanced" and are pretty clear about being leftish opinion. I haven't seen any of the news coverage on MSNBC, so I can't comment on whether it has any particular slant or not. Something to note about TRMS and Countdown. They're leftish, but not specifically partisan. They don't criticize Dems and Repubs equally, but they both do actually criticize Dems with some frequency (including *gasp* President Obama... Guess they're part of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy too now!).
__________________
Does it sound logical that I would talk about the mother of a big white guy with a gun?

^[:wq
migopod is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 04:40 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,347
Slim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by migopod View Post
My experience with MSNBC is limited to TRMS and Countdown. They are leftish political opinion shows. Unlike Fox news however, they do not claim to be "fair and balanced" and are pretty clear about being leftish opinion. I haven't seen any of the news coverage on MSNBC, so I can't comment on whether it has any particular slant or not. Something to note about TRMS and Countdown. They're leftish, but not specifically partisan. They don't criticize Dems and Repubs equally, but they both do actually criticize Dems with some frequency (including *gasp* President Obama... Guess they're part of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy too now!).
You guys are too funny. Leftish? Geez. C'mon at least be a little honest.
__________________
Truth is Liberal.
Slim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 04:48 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
migopod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 526
migopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond reputemigopod has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to migopod
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slim View Post
You guys are too funny. Leftish? Geez. C'mon at least be a little honest.
Leftish as in "Leftist-ish". I'm a totally unabashed Leftist and Socialist. I knows me when I sees me, and they both definitely have their moments.
__________________
Does it sound logical that I would talk about the mother of a big white guy with a gun?

^[:wq
migopod is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 05:01 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,347
Slim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff View Post
I don't watch MSNBC, so can't comment on it.
Yeah, most people don't. Typically its the same folks that listen to AirAmerica.
__________________
Truth is Liberal.
Slim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 05:11 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Way Out West
Posts: 5,707
jeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond repute
So, what's your point, Slim?

A network that 4 years ago said that anyone who didn't support Bush was unpatriotic because you're unpatriotic if you don't support the president, now spends 24x7 attacking the president, and they're not a partisan organization? And spends hours of airtime promoting protest rallies is "fair and balanced?"

I was doing some work with the TV on and listened to Fox for a while. They spent some time smearing Obama. Then they spent some time saying how Rush Limbaugh is a victim who is being treated unfairly. Then they spent some time saying that health care reform is a socialist plot that will bankrupt all of us. Oh yeah, lots of room for other viewpoints from the "balanced" network.

Pointing fingers at other people is at best a "tu quoque" fallacy (I'm substituting for Inq until he should decide to weigh in). Fox is a full-time editorial page attacking any moderate or left-leaning politician. There's no problem with pointing out what they are.
__________________
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different."
jeff is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 05:33 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,347
Slim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff View Post
So, what's your point, Slim?

A network that 4 years ago said that anyone who didn't support Bush was unpatriotic because you're unpatriotic if you don't support the president, now spends 24x7 attacking the president, and they're not a partisan organization? And spends hours of airtime promoting protest rallies is "fair and balanced?"

I was doing some work with the TV on and listened to Fox for a while. They spent some time smearing Obama. Then they spent some time saying how Rush Limbaugh is a victim who is being treated unfairly. Then they spent some time saying that health care reform is a socialist plot that will bankrupt all of us. Oh yeah, lots of room for other viewpoints from the "balanced" network.

Pointing fingers at other people is at best a "tu quoque" fallacy (I'm substituting for Inq until he should decide to weigh in). Fox is a full-time editorial page attacking any moderate or left-leaning politician. There's no problem with pointing out what they are.
Why dont you listen to MSNBC for a while before you get on your high horse and cry about how "biased" and unfair you think Fox is and realize that the same level of bias takes place on the other side as well. But of course you wouldnt know because you dont listen to it

My point is that for the administration to come out specifically against Fox and for Emmanuel to try and ostracize Fox is typical of how liberals like to play. If they dont like what is being said about them, they attack it and try and stop it. GWB claiming the NYT is partisan (which it clearly is, IMO) is hardly what this administration is trying to do to Fox.

__________________
Truth is Liberal.
Slim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 05:45 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,930
keith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slim View Post
If they dont like what is being said about them, they attack it and try and stop it.
Paranoia alert.

Exactly how is Obama not appearing on Fox attacking? What exactly are they stopping?



Unless of course they are scared that being deprived of his awesome company will make them go all spotty.

I don't think they've blamed the liberal agenda for acne, but it's only a matter of time.
__________________
.....
keith is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 05:46 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Way Out West
Posts: 5,707
jeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond reputejeff has a reputation beyond repute
Let me get this.
According to Slim:
GWB saying NYT was partisan against him was okay.
Obama saying Fox is partisan against him is bad.

Sure, that makes sense. And Slim really equates the two organizations. Clue for the "rabid partisan": The NYT is a news organization that has an editorial page. Fox "News" is an editorial.

But, if he really want to make me listen to MSNBC, I suppose I should accommodate you.
__________________
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different."

Last edited by jeff; 10-19-2009 at 05:50 PM.. Reason: edit because keith interposed a post, making who I was responding to unclear
jeff is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 05:48 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,347
Slim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by keith View Post
Paranoia alert.

Exactly how is Obama not appearing on Fox attacking? What exactly are they stopping?



Unless of course they are scared that being deprived of his awesome company will make them go all spotty.

I don't think they've blamed the liberal agenda for acne, but it's only a matter of time.
Why dont you read some news, get a clue and come back when you have one. I provided a link for folks like you. Please feel free to use it.
__________________
Truth is Liberal.
Slim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 05:54 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,347
Slim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff View Post
Let me get this.
According to Slim:
GWB saying NYT was partisan against him was okay.
Obama saying Fox is partisan against him is bad.

Sure, that makes sense. And Slim really equates the two organizations. Clue for the "rabid partisan": The NYT is a news organization that has an editorial page. Fox "News" is an editorial.

But, if he really want to make me listen to MSNBC, I suppose I should accommodate you.
Right. This is just about Obama saying Fox is biased.

Are you really this obtuse, or are you just acting?
__________________
Truth is Liberal.
Slim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 05:56 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,930
keith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond reputekeith has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slim View Post
Right. This is just about Obama saying Fox is biased.

Are you really this obtuse, or are you just acting?
Tell us what it's really about then.

(oh and I did read the news, although I am not to surprised that it took you over a week to get all frothy over it )
__________________
.....
keith is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 06:19 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 973
Hauptman has a reputation beyond reputeHauptman has a reputation beyond reputeHauptman has a reputation beyond reputeHauptman has a reputation beyond reputeHauptman has a reputation beyond reputeHauptman has a reputation beyond reputeHauptman has a reputation beyond reputeHauptman has a reputation beyond reputeHauptman has a reputation beyond reputeHauptman has a reputation beyond reputeHauptman has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slim View Post
Clearly you have not been watching any MSNBC or CNN. To try and say one is worse than the other is total rubbish.

They're all the same.
They're all the same in your little fantasy world, Slim. To anyone else, whose every post isn't a dismissive insulting rant against liberals, there is a world of difference.

That was really funny about Jeff being obtuse; projection at it's best.
__________________
- Wisdom is the knowledge of how much you don't know.
Hauptman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 06:50 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,347
Slim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond reputeSlim has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hauptman View Post
They're all the same in your little fantasy world, Slim. To anyone else, whose every post isn't a dismissive insulting rant against liberals, there is a world of difference.

That was really funny about Jeff being obtuse; projection at it's best.
Wahaahaa. I'm at least trying to be somewhat intellectually honest and say that there is bias on both sides. You and Jeff on the other hand....

"Duh, I cant comment because I never watched it..."

Please.
__________________
Truth is Liberal.
Slim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US Fencers Attend White House 10000Fencers Fencing Discussion 2 10-09-2008 08:05 PM
Bush White House still Actively Championing Torture esskreemr Politics 142 11-28-2005 06:06 PM
Alleged White House spy caught Maeve_Mari Politics 25 10-08-2005 05:36 PM
Fake reporter unmasked at White House Maeve_Mari Politics 23 02-16-2005 08:47 PM
News With a Point - Dec 13, 2004 (formerly News of the Steel) esskreemr Fencing Discussion 0 12-13-2004 02:49 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 AM.


(c) 1995 - 2009 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 -    
Follow fencing.net on Facebook