topleft topright

View Poll Results: Don't ask don't tell action

Voters
24. You may not vote on this poll
  • Needs to be repealed ASAP

    12 50.00%
  • Current action is sufficient

    2 8.33%
  • Repeal needs to be fought

    1 4.17%
  • No gays should be allowed in the military at all

    2 8.33%
  • All gay military

    5 20.83%
  • No opinion

    2 8.33%
Closed Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 61 to 78 of 78
  1. #61
    Senior Member Array erooMynohtnA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    4,837
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata View Post
    Same reason that military women doubtless would not have been pleased at the prospect of rooming or showering with straight men.

    Attraction doesn't enter into it. In my day the women to be found in the Army were attractive to no one, but I daresay would not have been convinced to shower or room with guys on that basis!
    I've showered with gay guys. They were a lot more uncomfortable than I was. Of course, I can't ask them to be more comfortable just as I couldn't ask you to magically be fine with it.

    Same with a gay roommate. I've had one for several years now. He is far more disgusted by my exploits than I his, but I do wish that the stereotypical gay fastidiousness were universal.
    >:U

  2. #62
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    33,804
    So the question is: On what basis should US military policy be formed using your sensibilities as the norm rather than mine? Or to put it another way, whose sensiblities should be ignored when defining what is "just"?
    Use the Shift key, people! Keyboard manufacturers everywhere are ineffably saddened when you ignore what they made just for you!

  3. #63
    Senior Member Array migopod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    MKE WI
    Posts
    2,799
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata View Post
    So the question is: On what basis should US military policy be formed using your sensibilities as the norm rather than mine? Or to put it another way, whose sensiblities should be ignored when defining what is "just"?
    When the military became racially integrated, there was considerable push-back from a number of quarters. Would it have been "just" to coddle the sensibilities of the pro-segregation faction at the expense of other races in the services?
    Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
    ~
    ^[:wq

  4. #64
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    1,837
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata View Post
    So the question is: On what basis should US military policy be formed using your sensibilities as the norm rather than mine? Or to put it another way, whose sensiblities should be ignored when defining what is "just"?
    I would say that we shouldn't cater to anyones sensibilities.

    This is a simple matter of civil rights. Excluding homosexuals from military service is institutional discrimination which as a society we are supposedly against.

    The fact that you are bothered by showering with a homosexual is your problem and not the military's. As a soldier, you are there to do a job and follow orders. And let's face it, a soldier endures far more objectionable conditions and orders than what you describe.

    Personally I'm not fond of showering with other men regardless of their sexual orientation. If it was a big problem for me then it would be foolish for me to volunteer for military service.

    It is also a matter of military necessity. We are losing valuable personnel with often rare skills because they happen to be gay, and someone else feels uncomfortable. IF there is a conflict then I say discharge the homophobes.
    - Wisdom is the knowledge of how much you don't know.

  5. #65
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    33,804
    Quote Originally Posted by Hauptman View Post
    The fact that you are bothered by showering with a homosexual is your problem and not the military's. As a soldier, you are there to do a job and follow orders. And let's face it, a soldier endures far more objectionable conditions and orders than what you describe.
    So, the military should also integrate men and women based on the same rationale, right?

    Think of all the money we could save by not having separate barracks and shower facilities!

    Of course, many women would complain about that, but hey, that's their problem, and there are worse conditions, so...

    Maybe while we're at it we should integrate officers and enlisted men. Quarter 'em together, it will promote equality!

    Never mind that the military by its very nature is about inequality...
    Use the Shift key, people! Keyboard manufacturers everywhere are ineffably saddened when you ignore what they made just for you!

  6. #66
    Senior Member Array fencerchica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,061
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata View Post
    So, the military should also integrate men and women based on the same rationale, right?
    As we've discussed earlier in this thread, there is already a serious problem with female servicemembers being sexually harrassed by their male colleagues. Contrast that with the lack of significant numbers of same-sex sexual harrassment despite the known presence of gay men and women in the military.

    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata View Post
    Maybe while we're at it we should integrate officers and enlisted men. Quarter 'em together, it will promote equality!
    What, are you trying to get extra points by combining a straw man with a red herring?

  7. #67
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    1,837
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata View Post
    So, the military should also integrate men and women based on the same rationale, right?

    Think of all the money we could save by not having separate barracks and shower facilities!

    Of course, many women would complain about that, but hey, that's their problem, and there are worse conditions, so...

    Maybe while we're at it we should integrate officers and enlisted men. Quarter 'em together, it will promote equality!

    Never mind that the military by its very nature is about inequality...
    Actually, I have no problem with integrating men and women if there is a necessity. But I don't see us excluding women from service on that basis, or did I miss that?
    - Wisdom is the knowledge of how much you don't know.

  8. #68
    Senior Member Array MyrddinsPrecint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,724
    Blog Entries
    37
    I'll be honest, I hated changing for gym. I hated it before I knew I liked chicks, I hated it when I knew and most people didn't, I hated it when I was out and didn't really know how well known it was. I always changed in one of the three bathroom stalls. The showers had stalls (in both locker rooms), but there wasn't enough time to take one anyway (unless you were a senior with an amazing schedule). Once I got to college, I largely got over it.

    But if we imagine, instead, a system in which every urinal, every toilet, every shower, every bed-- had a door to lock. They might be small (especially rooms), but if every individual had a partition and a door for their particularly private moments.... why not integrate? (that goes for gay/straight as well as men/women)

  9. #69
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kirkland, WA
    Posts
    2,074
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata View Post
    Never mind that the military by its very nature is about inequality...
    I don't think "comfort" is high up on the priority list either.

  10. #70
    Senior Member Array chase's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    439
    Quote Originally Posted by Hauptman View Post

    It is also a matter of military necessity. We are losing valuable personnel with often rare skills because they happen to be gay, and someone else feels uncomfortable. IF there is a conflict then I say discharge the homophobes.
    In other words: Discharge 40% of the military. Way to support our troops.
    Bury socialist healthcare with Ted Kennedy.

    Cutting liberals down to size is my business, and business is GOOD.

  11. #71
    Senior Member Array erooMynohtnA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    4,837
    Quote Originally Posted by chase View Post
    In other words: Discharge 40% of the military. Way to support our troops.
    I have news for you, our troops wouldn't even use you as a jockstrap.
    >:U

  12. #72
    Senior Member Array chase's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    439
    Quote Originally Posted by erooMynohtnA View Post
    I have news for you, our troops wouldn't even use you as a jockstrap.
    Like you would know. I know many brave soldiers personally and I normally participate in fundraisers to help them (especially now adays when their not getting any help from 0bama).
    Bury socialist healthcare with Ted Kennedy.

    Cutting liberals down to size is my business, and business is GOOD.

  13. #73
    Senior Member Array erooMynohtnA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    4,837
    Quote Originally Posted by chase View Post
    Like you would know. I know many brave soldiers personally and I normally participate in fundraisers to help them (especially now adays when their not getting any help from 0bama).
    Ok, you made your case. If you really want, soldiers would use you as a jockstrap, but I won't ask if you don't tell.
    >:U

  14. #74
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    33,804
    Quote Originally Posted by fencerchica View Post
    As we've discussed earlier in this thread, there is already a serious problem with female servicemembers being sexually harrassed by their male colleagues. Contrast that with the lack of significant numbers of same-sex sexual harrassment despite the known presence of gay men and women in the military.
    How do you know there is so little of the latter? I will suggest that if there are career implications and psychic trauma for women in reporting harassments, there are much worse for a male reporting harassment by a male. Enough, I suspect, that if it happens it is not reported, but either solved by personal violence or not solved at all...
    Use the Shift key, people! Keyboard manufacturers everywhere are ineffably saddened when you ignore what they made just for you!

  15. #75
    Senior Member Array MyrddinsPrecint's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,724
    Blog Entries
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by chase View Post
    Like you would know. I know many brave soldiers personally and I normally participate in fundraisers to help them (especially now adays when their not getting any help from 0bama).
    *blinks*

    Yes, how on Earth would an Army Electrician know anything about people in the Army???

  16. #76
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    1,837
    Quote Originally Posted by chase View Post
    In other words: Discharge 40% of the military. Way to support our troops.
    Actually, Chase, I support all of our troops; not just the fundamentalist Christian types.

    But if you think that 40% of our troops are homophobes, incapable of controlling their feelings while serving our country.... well, you're entitled to your opinion.
    - Wisdom is the knowledge of how much you don't know.

  17. #77
    Senior Member Array erik_blank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Indiana, PA
    Posts
    2,388
    Quote Originally Posted by erooMynohtnA View Post
    I have news for you, our troops wouldn't even use you as a jockstrap.
    Arrrghhh!!! must.... wash.... image.... from..... brain...... (where's that bottle of Johny Walker?)
    "Rub her feet!" - Lazarus Long, Time enough for Love, Robert A. Heinlein

    "Never moon a werewolf."
    Mike Binder

  18. #78
    Posting Hound Array Purple Fencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Panorama City, ca USA
    Posts
    10,480
    Quote Originally Posted by erik_blank View Post
    Arrrghhh!!! must.... wash.... image.... from..... brain...... (where's that bottle of Johny Walker?)
    *passes Eric the brain-scrubber*
    Need fencing equipment? See me at H.O.M. Fencing Supply

    Going to your first tournament? Read "Choose yer weapon, Laddie (or: Dude, where's my foil?)"

Similar Threads

  1. The Obama Dog
    By lindajdunn in forum Politics
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-20-2009, 11:49 AM
  2. Obama or McCain???
    By 2Shane in forum Politics
    Replies: 159
    Last Post: 10-02-2008, 07:22 PM
  3. Did you get this week's edition?
    By codedread in forum Water Cooler
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-08-2007, 08:26 AM
  4. New Escrime edition out
    By esskreemr in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-31-2005, 03:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30