| |
-
Senior Member
Array Does anyone else think it is odd.... ...that the USFA logo appears to be a sabre fencer fleching? At least I assume it's a sabre fencer, otherwise the point is WAY off target as it is curved up. I know the logo has probably been around longer than the rule banning forward crossovers in sabre, but still.... -
Senior Member
Array Yes, they do.
--Philistine -
Senior Member
Array Are they left handed or right handed? Score 3 strokes, 4 seizures and 2 brain surgeries
I've had brain surgery, what's your excuse? -
Curmudgeon Emeritus
Array And what shoes are they wearing? Use the Shift key, people! Keyboard manufacturers everywhere are ineffably saddened when you ignore what they made just for you! -
Senior Member
Array Are they using an Italian grip?!? My fencing philosophy = quantity over quality. Eliminate the rest periods! Fence all three weapons! 15 touches for Vet DE's! -
Feline Groovy
Array What, no one's commenting on the pile of empty Red Bull cans in the background??? -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by VorpalCat What, no one's commenting on the pile of empty Red Bull cans in the background??? I thought they were beer cans... "Inside every older person is a younger person wondering what the hell happened." ~Cora Harvey Armstrong
Never do anything you wouldn't want to explain to the Paramedics! -
But what if their opponent had Point in line? -
Senior Member
Array There is a very good reason for this: The USFA logo was designed before fleching was made illegal in sabre. Back then, every sabre action was a fleche.
The bouts went something like this:
Ready... Fence. Halt! Simultaneous.
Ready... Fence. Halt! Simultaneous.
Ready... Fence. Halt! Simultaneous.
Now you know why fleching is illegal in sabre.
Yes, the current logo with the fencer blended with the flag was created after the illegalization of fleching in sabre. But it is simply an update of the older logo which came about long before it.
Last edited by nyacfencing; 08-03-2009 at 12:34 PM.
-
Senior Member
Array now the weapon is a foil I pointed this out long ago and was told they changed the weapon to a foil. Doesn't work, because it's a sabre fencing fleching. I like the old way, but then, I'm old. Glad you noticed -
Senior Member
Array I kind of want to see a sabre bout with fleching, but I don't think many people know how to do them properly anymore. I hear at a high level that sabre fleches were spectacular to behold. -
I always like to imagine that he tripped and he's falling over. -
Senior Member
Array I'd like to see the sabre fleche reinstated merely because I dislike the term "flunge".
Sounds like a tool/ technique a plumber might use. Often in error. Never in doubt. -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by kapunga I kind of want to see a sabre bout with fleching, but I don't think many people know how to do them properly anymore. I hear at a high level that sabre fleches were spectacular to behold. You heard wrong. -
Senior Member
Array find old films  Originally Posted by kapunga I kind of want to see a sabre bout with fleching, but I don't think many people know how to do them properly anymore. I hear at a high level that sabre fleches were spectacular to behold.
If you can find any old films of Peter Westbrook, you will be amazed. The 1970's era was great fencing, before they just jumped at each other. Lots of tactics and really nice to see. I miss it. -
Fencing Expert
Array  Originally Posted by theLuz Doesn't work, because it's a sabre fencing fleching. Actually, the model used for the original design was a foilist. Granted, fleching with a sabre in hand.
-B "Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!" -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by kapunga I kind of want to see a sabre bout with fleching, but I don't think many people know how to do them properly anymore. I hear at a high level that sabre fleches were spectacular to behold. Non-electric officiating more so than fleching made sabre spectacular to watch. -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by contre-Sixte Non-electric officiating more so than fleching made sabre spectacular to watch. Why is that? And if that is the case, would you say electric scoring killed sabre fleches? -
Fencing Expert
Array C'mon, c'mon....move along folks....nothing more to see here... -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by kapunga Why is that? And if that is the case, would you say electric scoring killed sabre fleches? In the early days of electric saber almost everyone seemed to decide the best approach was to immediately attack you opponent with a fleche, trusting that the referee would recognize your attack as having priority over your opponent's counterattack (who of course had been doing the exact same thing with the exact same thought).
In an attempt to prevent saber from decaying into exactly the sort of bout which nyacfencing described the FIE decided to slow things down by disallowing forward crossing of the feet, thereby forcing fencers to take at least one step in order to close distance. IIRC the immediate response was little more than a switch from simultaneous fleche attacks to simultaneous advance-lunge attacks (which were arguably even more ugly) but over time people began to figure out how to use that extra bit of time to make their opponent's attack miss, thereby creating an opening for their own counterattack, or even parry and riposte (gasp!). Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules |
| |