topleft topright

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Senior Member Array Sins of the Fleche's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    140

    Approach to Bouts

    Let me first preface my question to all of you. A friend of mine who lives on my dorm hall goes to the same fencing club as I do. When we were leaving club one day, we were rehashing and dissecting our performances, as is our custom. At one point, he noted that he had improved in his ability to "feel" the match, and was trying to get to the point where he could fence more instinctively and not mentally scheme as much in a match. I remarked this was interesting, because I was trying to think more in my bouts, since I maintained that plotting your moves to get at observed weaknesses was key.

    So therein is my question, do you try to fence mainly with instinct and reflexes, or do you favor formulating a plan after observation? Which method do you think is better, or do you think it depends on the individual fencer?

    Thanks guys.
    "All epeeists wear very expensive running shoes which they have invariably stolen. It is a mark of shame in the epee subculture to wear legally-purchased footwear. Naturally this is difficult to ascertain merely by looking, and of course asking about it can lead to other complications."---Dave Barry (assist to Peach)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    119
    Short answer: All things in moderation
    Long answer: One without the other can only get you so far, but you will undoubtedly hit a glass ceiling sooner than if you can use both of these aspects, in my experience at least

  3. #3
    Fencing Expert Array Allen Evans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    3,658
    Blog Entries
    102
    If you're not using both, you're not really fencing.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array CvilleFencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Charlottesville VA
    Posts
    3,577
    As stated, the answer is both. As some simple examples, you need to be able to probe and feel out your opponent to understand how to match up your skill set to defeat them. You need to be able to think quickly once you have that information to set up actions and lay traps. What needs to be trained into instinct are the immediate actions themselves. Your footwork, parries and finishing actions should be matters of instinct that require no conscious thought. Feeling when is the right time to finish and being able to "fast slice" or instinctively process all the information you are getting and then act without delay or hesitation is the goal.
    Just another lost soul saved by the (hit) First Church of EPEE!

    Bona Na Croin. "Neither Collar nor Crown"

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array Lady Quindecim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    ::1
    Posts
    5,872
    I am reminded of a line from the film Top Gun.

    But yeah, you have to have a bag o' tricks. You have plans A and B, but then, you have to feel for which trick to pull out.
    Or something like that.
    Last edited by Lady Quindecim; 07-07-2009 at 03:19 PM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    103
    I think the "thinking/planning is for greater than 15 ft distance or so. Inside that area it is more feel and re-action. This, of course, from someone who does both poorly.

    --chris

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array RkfdFencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    At work, lurking the fnet forums
    Posts
    409
    More agreement with the answer of "both."

    I will get touches that I almost feel lucky to get - no thought, little or no setup, just being in the right position at the right moment. Of course, all the drilling gets you to the point where you can be in the right position at the right moment.

    However, I really enjoy the feeling of satisfaction from seeing what the opponent is doing, putting a plan together and scoring the touch. Even better when they loudly vocalize their frustration. :smile:
    My fencing philosophy = quantity over quality. Eliminate the rest periods! Fence all three weapons! 15 touches for Vet DE's!

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array Superscribe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,701
    Blog Entries
    45
    Personally, I think they represent two equally important parts of the fencing game. Relative to each other, I think instinctive and reflexive fencing represents the running game in football, and observing and planning represents the passing game.

    What do I mean by that metaphor? Classical doctrine dictates you have to establish the running game before you go to the passing game in football. You have to get your opponent to respect your instinctive fencing (running game), before you can manipulate them enough for the observe/scheme fencing to work.

    You have to establish your reflexes and instincts to a point where they are something solid, from which you can get creative. People I've seen have great success have trained to a point where they have excellent "go to" reactions. They are also creative enough to push or pull their opponent into a situation that they themselves can utilize said excellent "go to" reactions.

    I think it's possible to be just be faster and stronger than any other fencer out there and have great success.
    Last edited by Superscribe; 07-07-2009 at 03:32 PM. Reason: wrong preposition
    Everyone relax cause I got it....

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array Lady Quindecim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    ::1
    Posts
    5,872
    Coach once described it something like:
    Make your plan and go for it.
    Control the distance so you can make your plan and be ready when the chance comes.

    In this context, it is like, you have the plan laid out in your head, but you react on the current actions to get set up for your plan.

  10. #10
    Just Joined Array Korts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    16
    Instinct comes into play mostly concerning timing, reactive actions like ripostes, and distance. Planning your tactics and observing your opponent are important if you want to be offensive. The two are complementary, really, and if you want to be a well-rounded fencer, the answer is the one you've been given by every other poster here, i.e. both.
    nyeh

  11. #11
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by Korts View Post
    Instinct comes into play mostly concerning timing, reactive actions like ripostes, and distance. Planning your tactics and observing your opponent are important if you want to be offensive.
    The only problem I've got with this is that defensive fencers need to have the ability to think as well. If they keep doing a disengage from the same line because you keep doing that simple parry every single time...you still drop the bout.

  12. #12
    Just Joined Array Korts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by MBalderson View Post
    The only problem I've got with this is that defensive fencers need to have the ability to think as well. If they keep doing a disengage from the same line because you keep doing that simple parry every single time...you still drop the bout.
    Fair enough; my point was that defensive fencers' actions rely more on reflexes than offensive fencers' moves; that doesn't mean that preparation doesn't improve performance.
    nyeh

  13. #13
    Senior Member Array sabreur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Heidelberg, GE
    Posts
    5,807
    Blog Entries
    153
    To paint bamboo, study bamboo for years. Become bamboo. Then forget all about bamboo and paint.
    Why sabre? Because you don't take heads with the point.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    345
    Definitely both, my planned actions tend to revolve around probing to find out what actions in my repertoire will work. These actions tend to rely on instinct or trained muscle memory. Then I need another plan to be able to get myself and my opponent into a position where I can do this instinctive action.

    Example:

    I notice my opponent has a strong quatre parry, so I decide to set up a disengage attack, so give the feint, draw the parry and then from there the training kicks in to do the disengage in the right timing to avoid the parry and give me the opponening.

    Its a simple example I know but I hope it illustrates my point.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Array Sins of the Fleche's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    140
    Thanks everyone, I really appreciate the feedback.
    "All epeeists wear very expensive running shoes which they have invariably stolen. It is a mark of shame in the epee subculture to wear legally-purchased footwear. Naturally this is difficult to ascertain merely by looking, and of course asking about it can lead to other complications."---Dave Barry (assist to Peach)

  16. #16
    Fencing Expert Array oiuyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Pennsauken, NJ
    Posts
    11,810
    Quote Originally Posted by Korts View Post
    Instinct comes into play mostly concerning timing, reactive actions like ripostes, and distance. Planning your tactics and observing your opponent are important if you want to be offensive.
    If you're relying on instinct and reaction for your parries (and, worse, timing and distance) then you're not doing it right and probably not doing it well.

    Why would anyone want to be reactionary on defense. The key is to control one's opponent. Create the attack at a time of your choosing, at a distance of your choosing, at a point on the strip of your choosing. Assuming that you've chosen all of that and are reasonably good at choosing wisely you should have an attack which you can handle. And you should score.

    Play all of your defense as pure reaction to the plans your opponent has set up and initiated and you should lose most of the time.

    Planning your tactics and observing your opponent are important whether you want to be offensive, defensive, counter-offensive, or any mix of those. Not to mention knowing WHICH you want to be.

    -B
    "Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"

  17. #17
    Fencing Expert Array oiuyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Pennsauken, NJ
    Posts
    11,810
    Quote Originally Posted by Sins of the Fleche View Post
    So therein is my question, do you try to fence mainly with instinct and reflexes, or do you favor formulating a plan after observation? Which method do you think is better, or do you think it depends on the individual fencer?
    Go read both The Inner Game of Tennis by Tim Gallwey and Winning Ugly by Brad Gilbert. Two very different approaches to the game. Each works for some people. Both work for some people. Almost everything in both books can be easily translated to fencing, just ignore the tennis-specific parts.

    -B
    "Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"

  18. #18
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    33,793
    Quote Originally Posted by sabreur View Post
    To paint bamboo, study bamboo for years. Become bamboo. Then forget all about bamboo and paint.
    And hope that you don't encounter any hungry pandas.

    Quote Originally Posted by oiuyt View Post
    If you're relying on instinct and reaction for your parries (and, worse, timing and distance) then you're not doing it right and probably not doing it well.

    Why would anyone want to be reactionary on defense.
    OK, according to at least one analyst, that's been the road to success for one Mr. Dumitrescu.

    It's pretty much what I do, too. I mean, I have a plan before each phrase, but it usually goes right out the window as soon as the opponent does something unexpected. Is that reactionary, or just the reification of the Publilius Syrus maxim that it's a bad plan which admits of no modification?
    Last edited by Inquartata; 07-08-2009 at 10:52 AM.
    Use the Shift key, people! Keyboard manufacturers everywhere are ineffably saddened when you ignore what they made just for you!

  19. #19
    Fencing Expert Array oiuyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Pennsauken, NJ
    Posts
    11,810
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata View Post
    OK, according to at least one analyst, that's been the road to success for one Mr. Dumitrescu.
    Mmmm, that's a good point.

    I think that very few people can have any significant degree of success if/once they cede the initiative and control to their opponent, assuming the opponent is of a reasonable caliber and knows what to do with said initiative/control.

    Clearly Dumitrescu competes against people in that category, so I'll concede that perhaps for some exceptional individuals it is possible.

    -B
    "Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11-25-2008, 09:37 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-07-2008, 04:05 PM
  3. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 07-30-2006, 05:47 PM
  4. More memorable: bouts won or bouts lost?
    By victord66 in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 01-28-2006, 09:43 AM
  5. One of my first bouts
    By Adam in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-12-2003, 03:10 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30