topleft topright

View Poll Results: My preferred solution(s) (pick as many as apply)

Voters
24. You may not vote on this poll
  • The poll is flawed -- might as well put it at the top.

    4 16.67%
  • Canada's system, only with faster response times.

    9 37.50%
  • Leave it the way it is.

    3 12.50%
  • Require and fund SCHIP programs for all 50 states.

    5 20.83%
  • Pay-as-you-go health care. Eliminate insurance.

    0 0%
  • Crack down on waste, fraud and abuse.

    12 50.00%
  • Force companies to reduce costs of prescription medicines.

    6 25.00%
  • Tax health insurance benefits.

    2 8.33%
  • An insurance "clearing house" for consumers - private plans.

    7 29.17%
  • Expand Medicare/Medicaid to cover more people.

    11 45.83%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Closed Thread
Page 27 of 27 FirstFirst ... 172324252627
Results 521 to 522 of 522
  1. #521
    Senior Member Array jessicasimpson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    673
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata View Post

    I will go farther than that and say that I DO trust them to get it wrong. It's what they do best.
    Why do you hate America?
    "There is a fine line between clever and stupid" David St. Hubbins

  2. #522
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,807
    Hi!


    Quote Originally Posted by Epee_Pox View Post
    Most health insurance is an absolute waste of money, and I do not want it to be mandatory.

    Where I live, in New York, a modest health insurance plan for a family of 4 costs more than $2,000 per month.

    SNIP

    On the other hand, paying out of pocket for a doctor visit to a good Park Avenue doctor runs about $150.
    For comparison, here are prices in my district of Sweden, an areas with about 1 million inhabitants:

    Quote Originally Posted by Region Skåne
    Pediatric care(under 12 years), child+youth physicatry, child rehabiliation: Free

    Health department visit
    Visit at primary health care clinic, by patient designated as his 1st-choice unit: 120 kr
    Visit at other PHCC: 200 kr
    Visiting a nurse at a PHCC or hospital department: 0 kr
    Other specialist doctor: 300 kr
    Othe specialist doctor, after prior remittance by other doctor/nurse: 180 kr
    Hospital visit, without doctor visit: 200 kr
    Prenatal, postnatal, and toddler care: 0 kr
    Health information by telephone 0 kr
    Gynaecological health care checkup: 120 kr
    Mammography: 120 kr

    Acute care
    Akut- och jourbesök
    Visit at doctor, acute case: 300 kr
    Acute visit at hospital: 300 kr
    Visiting acute case reception (ER) after remittance by doctor at doctor´s acute case center: 0 kr

    Missed time, or unbooking within 24 hours from the booked time, will be paid in full.
    Misspellings and clunky translations are mine. Right now, the Swedish Krona stands at 0.147 USD. Some average monthly wages over here, for comparison:
    Primary and jr. High school teacher: 24500 SEK/month
    High school teacher 26300
    Senior doctor: 55000
    Engineer: 27 100

    Quote Originally Posted by Epee_Pox View Post
    There are reasons it's so expensive -- healthy folks who never go to the doctor are lumped together with sick folks and hypochondriacs who go all the time -- insurance companies have to give you a policy even if you've already gotten an expensive-to-treat condition -- all kinds of stupid stuff like acupuncture and holistic crap has to be covered. So premiums do not reflect YOUR risk, they represent the risk of the expensive health-care users.
    SNIP
    In Sweden, all people get lumped together - strong body or healthy lifestyle do not give deductions. However, the prices of alcohol and tobacco are heavily taxed, in order to depress use. Since all citizens, and most other inhabitants, are enrolled in the national health care system at birth the issue of preexisting conditions is moot.

    There is a law/national policy that all medical care must "be grounded in science and tried experience". This is a severe limitation on many nonscientific treatment modes. It is not a political decision on what should pass that hurdle, instead there is a subcommittee in the "The National Board of Health and Welfare", a FDA-like organization, but with a lot more medical stuff on its slate. The committee members are doctors and unelected career bureaucrats, and not much in the way of touchy-feely mush gets past them.

    Once in a blue moon, some really costly users skew the system over here. I read an article about the medicine consumption in various local counties, and one small county was head and shoulders over the rest. In the article, it was stated that this was solely due to the fact that there was a family with an unusual heriditary disease there. With medication, they could live a full life, without, they would die. Those 4 people pulled up the average medicine cost for that 15,000-person county some 50%, IIRC. Treatment of them was not difficult, just extremely costly.

    Quote Originally Posted by Epee_Pox View Post
    Health insurance would make sense if it only covered emergency needs -- you take care of the inexpensive doctor visits, but the insurance is there in case someone breaks a leg or gets in a car accident or gets cancer. But that's not how it works here. It's all or nothing.

    Health insurance would make sense if your premiums reflected your own risk of ever needing to use it. Healthy people who exercise and don't smoke and only go to the doctor for their annual checkup should not have to pay as much as constant smokers or emergency room frequent fliers. But that's not how it works here.
    Over here, individual health care users pay the costs listed above out of pocket until they have reached the maximum cost limit, that is that they have payed 900 SEK during the latest 365 days rolling. Anything over that, and the state pitches in. There are also separate maximum cost limits for dental treatment and medicine costs. By doing it this way, no one is bankrupted by medical costs, and those who only have relatively minor costs have to pay most of it themselves. The dreariness of sitting in a hospital waiting room is deterrent enough for most people.


    Have a nice time!

    Peter Gustafsson

Similar Threads

  1. Haircut for health!?!?!
    By rac in forum Water Cooler
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-21-2006, 10:57 AM
  2. Canadian Electoral Reform
    By jBirch in forum Politics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-17-2006, 01:20 PM
  3. Tort reform
    By esskreemr in forum Politics
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-10-2004, 02:36 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-31-2004, 10:30 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30