Div II/III Combined Qualifiers - Fencing Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing Discussion > General Fencing > Fencing Discussion

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2009, 09:17 AM   #1
Just Joined
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2
German Tip is on a distinguished road
I was at the NJ Division Div II/III combined Summer National qualifier last week. While everyone understood the qualification rules for Div III, I could not find one fencer who understood the Div III qualification rules in this combined event. I heard a few complaints about people being knocked out by C rated fencers, but in the end there were a lot of happy people who unexpectedly qualified for Div III.

Was there a rule change in September 2008 that allowed the significant increase in Div III qualifiers? Here is a summary of how it worked:

Div II
- Top 25% qualified

Div III
- C rated fencers were removed from the results
- 25% of the remaining fencers qualified
- D, E & U fencers who qualified for Div II, auto qualified for Div III, and were skipped

For example – 44 total fencers, 4 had a C rating and all qualified for Div II

Div II
- 11 qualified (7 were rated D or under, the other 4 were Cs)

Div III
- 10 qualified (25% of the 40 remaining fencers after the 4 Cs were eliminated)
- The first 7 were auto qualifiers, so they were skipped and the next 10 qualified for Div III
- Thus a total of 17 of 40 eligible fencers qualified for Div III
German Tip is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 04-09-2009, 10:07 AM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 78
foilwatcher is a glorious beacon of lightfoilwatcher is a glorious beacon of lightfoilwatcher is a glorious beacon of lightfoilwatcher is a glorious beacon of lightfoilwatcher is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by German Tip View Post
I was at the NJ Division Div II/III combined Summer National qualifier last week. While everyone understood the qualification rules for Div III, I could not find one fencer who understood the Div III qualification rules in this combined event. I heard a few complaints about people being knocked out by C rated fencers, but in the end there were a lot of happy people who unexpectedly qualified for Div III.

Was there a rule change in September 2008 that allowed the significant increase in Div III qualifiers? Here is a summary of how it worked:

Div II
- Top 25% qualified

Div III
- C rated fencers were removed from the results
- 25% of the remaining fencers qualified
- D, E & U fencers who qualified for Div II, auto qualified for Div III, and were skipped

For example – 44 total fencers, 4 had a C rating and all qualified for Div II

Div II
- 11 qualified (7 were rated D or under, the other 4 were Cs)

Div III
- 10 qualified (25% of the 40 remaining fencers after the 4 Cs were eliminated)
- The first 7 were auto qualifiers, so they were skipped and the next 10 qualified for Div III
- Thus a total of 17 of 40 eligible fencers qualified for Div III
Kind of complicated the way you described it, but sounds right, The rules, simply, are:

DIVISION III
Fencers must have a classification in the weapon of “D”, “E” or Unclassified at the time of the
qualifying competition AND meet age requirements as above AND –
 Place in the top 25% (see Chapter 2.7 for detailed chart) of the total number of “D”, “E”
or “U” fencers competing in the current season Division’s Division II Qualifying
competition (when Division II and Division III qualifying competition held together)

And, yes, Div II qualifiers who are not "C's", get an auto qualifier to Div III in this situation.
foilwatcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Old 04-09-2009, 10:24 AM   #3
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 10,690
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
To answer the other part of your question, yes there was a change made in September. It partially reversed a change made two years ago.

It is easier to qualify to D3 this year than last, but not as easy as prior to the first change.

-B
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Old 04-09-2009, 11:03 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
tkexi991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 214
tkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to tkexi991 Send a message via MSN to tkexi991 Send a message via Yahoo to tkexi991
But why isn't Div II still a cascade event for Div III for everyone? GA DIV has seperate II/III events, but if you qualify for II and have a rough day in III (it happens), then boom - just Div II for you.
tkexi991 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Old 04-09-2009, 11:14 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
epeemike81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dana Hall School, Wellesely, MA
Posts: 4,311
epeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to epeemike81
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkexi991 View Post
But why isn't Div II still a cascade event for Div III for everyone? GA DIV has seperate II/III events, but if you qualify for II and have a rough day in III (it happens), then boom - just Div II for you.
this is not true anymore. Qualifying to Div II is a qualification path for Div III as of the September BOD meeting.

-m
epeemike81 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Old 04-09-2009, 11:31 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
tkexi991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 214
tkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond reputetkexi991 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to tkexi991 Send a message via MSN to tkexi991 Send a message via Yahoo to tkexi991
Quote:
Originally Posted by epeemike81 View Post
this is not true anymore. Qualifying to Div II is a qualification path for Div III as of the September BOD meeting.

-m
Fair enough. Would have been nice when I still had a D though...
tkexi991 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Old 04-09-2009, 07:59 PM   #7
Just Joined
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2
German Tip is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by oiuyt View Post
To answer the other part of your question, yes there was a change made in September. It partially reversed a change made two years ago.

It is easier to qualify to D3 this year than last, but not as easy as prior to the first change.
Can you explain the change made two years ago? I tried the USFA site, but I could only find the current Athlete handbook and I didn't know where else to look. I am curious.
German Tip is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Old 04-09-2009, 08:37 PM   #8
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 10,690
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
Quote:
Originally Posted by German Tip View Post
Can you explain the change made two years ago? I tried the USFA site, but I could only find the current Athlete handbook and I didn't know where else to look. I am curious.
Two years ago a change was made removing all trickle-down qualifications to senior events.

Qualifying for IA no longer made one a qualifier for II.
Qualifying for II no longer made one a qualifier for III.
Qualifying for cadet or junior no longer made one a qualifier for II (and, through that, III).

The first two of those were restored in September.

-B
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Tweet This!Share on FacebookReddit!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Combined" (male, female) Non-Electric Foil -- Milwaukee Sport Fencing Academy ... Web Bot Tournament Results 0 03-09-2009 09:50 PM
Fortune Fencing "D" Epee and PCS Vet Combined Epee -- Fortune Fencing: Pasadena, CA Web Bot Tournament Results 0 11-17-2008 06:50 PM
DivII/III combined qualifiers and FencingTime... bluethunder Fencing Discussion 3 04-07-2006 06:45 PM
jo qualifiers Q skater_fencerbo Fencing Discussion 4 09-07-2003 11:05 PM
athletics combined with fencing earlie Fencing Discussion 3 04-19-2003 02:47 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 AM.


(c) 1995 - 2010 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2 -    
Follow fencing.net on Facebook