 |  |
-
Senior Member
Array 
change the FAQ? It seems to me that since the idea of a distance parry has come under serious criticism by both the FIE and USFA, that f.net should remove it from the FAQ.
http://www.fencing.net/forums/faq.ph...distance_parry
-
what is wrong in there. as stated? what would you change it to?
-
Senior Member
Array
 Originally Posted by noodle  what is wrong in there. as stated? what would you change it to? Everything it says is correct except if there is a PiL in existence at the end of the attack. As you know, there is considerable controversy on this board as to whether the counterattack has priority, even though there doesn't seem to be any confusion in either the USFA or FIE.
Tomas
-
Originally Posted by Tomas N Everything it says is correct except if there is a PiL in existence at the end of the attack. As you know, there is considerable controversy on this board as to whether the counterattack has priority, even though there doesn't seem to be any confusion in either the USFA or FIE.
Tomas i would argue that the entry is fine as it is, but another entry for residual line should be put directly after it.
Similar Threads -
By Sergeant Perecz in forum Armory - Q&A
Replies: 29
Last Post: 12-30-2008, 09:52 AM -
By El Chucko in forum Fencing Discussion
Replies: 51
Last Post: 01-13-2006, 04:08 AM -
By LUDICROUS in forum Fencing Discussion
Replies: 4
Last Post: 01-09-2005, 03:55 AM -
By cathy a former fencer in forum Fencing Discussion
Replies: 3
Last Post: 12-08-2003, 01:11 PM -
By pkt in forum Fencing Discussion
Replies: 0
Last Post: 09-15-2003, 10:22 PM 
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules |
| |
