topleft topright

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34
  1. #1
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,451

    Web-Based NAC Registration

    Up until a couple of weeks ago, the home page for USFA had a note saying that web-based NAC registration would be available in August. The note has since disappeared. Does anyone know whether that was just to clean things up to make room for the image of the Sabrettes? or is the web-based regsitration no longer coming?

  2. #2
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    away
    Posts
    4,514
    Quote Originally Posted by fdad View Post
    Up until a couple of weeks ago, the home page for USFA had a note saying that web-based NAC registration would be available in August. The note has since disappeared. Does anyone know whether that was just to clean things up to make room for the image of the Sabrettes? or is the web-based regsitration no longer coming?
    I believe that the outgoing administration took the application and all documentation with them when they left. Probably took offense at some of the comments on that website.
    au revoir

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,451
    So is it possible that they will do the sensible thing and use FRED? Or is web-based registration a dead issue?

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kirkland, WA
    Posts
    2,074
    Quote Originally Posted by rephrased fdad View Post
    Are we there yet?
    I shortened up that post for you. I expect that the message board would explode if it were announced that AskFred was going to be officially used.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    away
    Posts
    4,514
    Quote Originally Posted by fdad View Post
    So is it possible that they will do the sensible thing and use FRED? Or is web-based registration a dead issue?
    Well since various forumites would be able to provide an accurate answer to your question, the obvious conclusions are;

    The system is under wraps in preparation for a star studded launch.

    or

    The truth is a bit embarrassing and they hope no-one noticed.


    The third possibility, not to be discounted, is that in order to reduce the carbon footprint of the USFA they are training crack squads of carrier pigeons. Expect one in the mail with your new membership card!
    au revoir

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,451
    The new membership card came via USPS, with last year's NAC schedule attached ;-)

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,537
    The USFA is incompetent. Is this really a surprise?
    "Life is like a wheel, where everyone steals, but when we rise, it's like Strawberry Fields."

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array peet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    2,187
    Quote Originally Posted by keith View Post
    The third possibility, not to be discounted, is that in order to reduce the carbon footprint of the USFA they are training crack squads of carrier pigeons. Expect one in the mail with your new membership card!
    Perhaps the new online registration system will incorporate IPOAC (RFC 1149)

    -p

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array peet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    2,187
    Or perhaps real snail mail.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array peet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    2,187
    Or perhaps saner heads will prevail.


    -p

  11. #11
    Senior Member Array peet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    2,187
    Hey look, I rhymed.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Array peet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    2,187
    Ok, I'll stop now.










    sorry...

  13. #13
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    away
    Posts
    4,514
    Quote Originally Posted by peet View Post
    Or perhaps saner heads will prevail.


    -p
    slightly worried that you are not yet convinced of this
    au revoir

  14. #14
    Senior Member Array peet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    2,187
    Quote Originally Posted by keith View Post
    slightly worried that you are not yet convinced of this

    Merely waiting to count chickens until they are hatched.

    and grown.



    and slaughtered.








    and cooked and eaten.






    and....




    ok, you can guess the rest..

  15. #15
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,451
    So many postings, so few answers.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    away
    Posts
    4,514
    Quote Originally Posted by fdad View Post
    So many postings, so few answers.
    Perhaps you should make a contribution to peet to help him out.
    au revoir

  17. #17
    ಠ_ಠ Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    5,958
    Blog Entries
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by fdad View Post
    So many postings, so few answers.
    here's an answer: i put my own online nac/membership registration system that i was working with on hold, because i didn't want to do something that would just get supplanted and consequently never used. if the new candidates don't produce something soon, i'll continue developing it and hopefully have something for fencers to use before the second or third nac.

  18. #18
    Moderator Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    11,972
    Quote Originally Posted by fdad View Post
    So is it possible that they will do the sensible thing and use FRED? Or is web-based registration a dead issue?
    FRED, as it stands, isn't a great idea.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Array peet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    2,187
    Quote Originally Posted by KD5MDK View Post
    FRED, as it stands, isn't a great idea.
    It's not far off the mark though, and could work fine with a few tweaks. Especially in the short term.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,451
    Quote Originally Posted by KD5MDK View Post
    FRED, as it stands, isn't a great idea.
    Are there specific problems with FRED that make it unusable for NAC registrations?

Similar Threads

  1. New User Registration
    By EdGardner in forum Comments & Suggestions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-21-2008, 04:44 PM
  2. Age(ing) question, and registration
    By Sciurus-Rex in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-11-2005, 12:10 PM
  3. New Fencing Forum (UK Based)
    By Boo Boo in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-18-2003, 06:42 PM
  4. Arlington NAC REGistration
    By Phillip Inoy in forum Rec Sport Fencing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-17-2003, 02:48 PM
  5. Help: NAC registration?
    By Bugaboo in forum Discussion Archive
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-14-2001, 05:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30