Odd DE Table--WS Gand World Cup - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > General Fencing > Fencing Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-11-2008, 09:46 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Capt. Slo-mo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,366
Capt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond repute
Odd DE Table--WS Gand World Cup

Strange brackets observed in the WS World Cup in Belgium this weekend. Two American Olympians, Mariel Zagunis and Dagmara Wozniak, are listed in the round of 64 DE table on Saturday, following pools, but neither fencer is believed to actually be in Belgium...at least Mariel was in Portland at practice Friday night.

At #2 seed, Mariel gets a bye into the 32, where her purported opponent, Gavrilova of Russia, gets a freebie (by exclusion) into the top 16. 16th seed Wozniak lets France's Baptiste go by into the 32, also by exclusion, according to the event website.

Strange. If I recall, the top 16 fencers who normally get a bye on pool day, have to confirm their participation before pools, so the seeding is accurate for who has to fence and who slides into the top 16 and receives that first day bye.

So was it a monumental paperwork error on the organizer's part, yet no one from the US team looking at the DE table after pools noticed that two absent Americans were still on the board? Or did the US team, represented by the Sabre Squad manager, not properly notify the officials of the withdrawn fencers?

Either way, a potential debit in the US fencing karma account, at least from the FIE's point of view.

The competition results:
1 TOUYA Anne-Lise FRA
2 DIATCHENKO Ekaterina RUS
3 NAGY Orsolya HUN
3 VERGNE Carole FRA
5 NETCHAEVA Elena RUS
6 KHARLAN Olga UKR
7 ARGIOLAS Cecile FRA
8 GAVRILOVA Julia RUS

16 BARATTA Emma USA
26 SCHNEIDER Daria USA

35 WHEELER Diamond USA
44 OSIER Lian USA
__________________
"Fraud is the creation of trust. And then: its betrayal."
William Black, Ph.D.
Capt. Slo-mo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 05-12-2008, 11:18 AM   #2
Have Blazer, Will Travel
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,037
KD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to KD5MDK
Extremely curious. Are top 16 fencers presumed to be attending unless withdrawn? Were our fencers initially entered?
KD5MDK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 03:03 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Capt. Slo-mo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,366
Capt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond repute
Our fencers were intially entered. Several withdrew, but as of the last updated list on the USFencing website, both Mariel and Daga were still listed.

I have heard the PA announcer at most of the World Cup meets announcing that the top 16 fencers needed to confirm their participation to the DT table by a certain deadline...but as far as I know, that confirmation is usually done by the coach or the squad manager.
__________________
"Fraud is the creation of trust. And then: its betrayal."
William Black, Ph.D.
Capt. Slo-mo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 03:32 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 253
bjacobs has a brilliant futurebjacobs has a brilliant futurebjacobs has a brilliant futurebjacobs has a brilliant futurebjacobs has a brilliant futurebjacobs has a brilliant futurebjacobs has a brilliant futurebjacobs has a brilliant futurebjacobs has a brilliant futurebjacobs has a brilliant futurebjacobs has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to bjacobs
Aren't there some fairly hefty fines levied against American athletes who don't withdraw in time and do not compete?
bjacobs is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 07:11 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Capt. Slo-mo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,366
Capt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond repute
Yes, it's $1500 and you can't submit it for re-imbursement through the PEA or other USFA funding mechanisms. That may not be the case, here though.

Word on the street in Stumptown is that both fencers had "medical" withdrawals. Mariel reportedly turned her withdrawal paperwork in a week ago, so it's being said that if she wasn't removed from the list it's the "USFA's fault or the FIE's fault." No idea when Dagmara might have turned her paperwork in.

Now, without passing judgement on when or where the withdrawals were submitted...a document of participants was posted on the Gand website, 2 hours after the "closure of the lists," and was presumably in the DT's hands before pools on May 10th. Dagmara and Mariel were not listed as participants for the event, yet, following pools and direct eliminations to reduce the field to the top 48, they were still on the DE table for day 2 (May 11)...so the "it was an FIE problem" concept may have some validity. However; this may have either kept two competitors locked in the pools that should have gotten a pass to the second day, or kept two fencers from qualifying into the top 64...depending on when the two Americans were inserted into the list.

Either way, one still wonders if anyone from the US contingent pointed out the error before the start of the 64...given that the final 64 DE assignments are generated that first evening right after the pools and initial DEs.
__________________
"Fraud is the creation of trust. And then: its betrayal."
William Black, Ph.D.

Last edited by Capt. Slo-mo; 05-12-2008 at 07:16 PM.
Capt. Slo-mo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 10:02 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sunday River
Posts: 85
bbower has much to be proud ofbbower has much to be proud ofbbower has much to be proud ofbbower has much to be proud ofbbower has much to be proud ofbbower has much to be proud ofbbower has much to be proud ofbbower has much to be proud ofbbower has much to be proud of
From the handbook of specifications for GP tournaments

The entries being closed according to the deadlines provided for by article o.54.2, the organiser of Grand Prix competitions must establish the pools on Tuesday preceding the competition (cf. FIE information letter 11-2006, page 2, article o.12) and send them to the FIE and to the participating federations, on Wednesday preceding the competition.

See also FIE information letter 2-2007, page 3, article o.12.
The day preceding the competition, at 18 hours, the timetable of each round of pool, with the composition of each pool of fencers present, will be posted in the official Grand Prix hotels. No modification concerning the 16 exempted fencers previously communicated, can be done.
bbower is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New classification table? edew Fencing Discussion 6 09-15-2005 10:33 PM
DE 128 Table for Men's Epee Craig Fencing Discussion 2 10-06-2003 03:25 AM
Get away from MY Bout Committee Table! CarlKnoch Fencing Discussion 17 07-18-2003 05:39 AM
Ladies' Epee Table of 64 Cyranox11 Discussion Archive 0 10-26-2001 02:53 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 PM.


(c) 1995 - 2007 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 -    Medieval Swords from the online Replica Sword Shop