USACFC Competition Schedule and Participants List - Page 7 - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > General Fencing > Fencing Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-07-2008, 01:29 PM   #121
Fencing Expert
 
Allen Evans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,669
Allen Evans has a reputation beyond reputeAllen Evans has a reputation beyond reputeAllen Evans has a reputation beyond reputeAllen Evans has a reputation beyond reputeAllen Evans has a reputation beyond reputeAllen Evans has a reputation beyond reputeAllen Evans has a reputation beyond reputeAllen Evans has a reputation beyond reputeAllen Evans has a reputation beyond reputeAllen Evans has a reputation beyond reputeAllen Evans has a reputation beyond repute
Put down that keyboard and step away from the desk, Oiuyt.....
Allen Evans is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 04-07-2008, 01:53 PM   #122
Senior Member
 
Wafath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bowie, MD, USA
Posts: 416
Wafath has a reputation beyond reputeWafath has a reputation beyond reputeWafath has a reputation beyond reputeWafath has a reputation beyond reputeWafath has a reputation beyond reputeWafath has a reputation beyond reputeWafath has a reputation beyond reputeWafath has a reputation beyond reputeWafath has a reputation beyond reputeWafath has a reputation beyond reputeWafath has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Wafath
Quote:
Originally Posted by oiuyt View Post
I don't see justification for blaming the delays on the equipment issues.
I believe that it was a contributing factor, adding to the chaos and confusion of getting things started, but I agree that all delays (or even most) can not be blamed on that.

Some of the reason to blame this is strategic: the lack of strips working on time could have easily gone from a delay to a show-stopper. The fact that we should have had ~ 75% more strips than needed, and we still did not have everything working on time probably got some people a bit panicky and irritated.

But I suspect a large portion of this blame was a face-saving measure. Since I believe that it is my face to save or expose, I will deconstruct some of the delays now.

Two words may be used to understand most of those delays: "Beta Software".

Itemizing how things went wrong:

- It took too long to enter in team rosters. Part of this can be blamed on a moderate software bug, (A problem with the data entry screen), but this was fairly easily worked around, and I suspect cost no more than 5 minutes. A larger part of the problem was that this aspect of the BC was not parallelized; all of this work was done on a single computer.

I thought that this would be acceptable, since teams were required to submit their rosters in advance. I thought that there would be roughly 20-40 additions, corrections & deletions, and the majority of these would be turned into the BC 15 minutes before the close of registration. I thought that this would allow this work to be done no later than 5 minutes after close of registration. I was wrong. I am not sure which assumption I was wrong with, but I suspect it was all of them.

- There was a user error (in this case the user was me) in setting up sabre pools. (This cascaded. See more below.)

- There was a serious software error in how certain pools were set up. All like combinations of # of strips & # of teams in a pool were hard-coded. the case of 10 teams on 5 strips had a problem. (I mis-transcribed #s.) This case happened on pool 3 of foil & epee. It was the best decision to make at the time. (this also cascaded. See more below.)

- The software only allowed the user to print all of the bout slips for all of the pools in a weapon, not one pool or one bout slip. This meant that the above to items cascaded down. It took roughly 55 pages of printing to send out an event. I calculated that this was acceptable on a single printer if this was started 20 minutes before teams were to report to strips. (on most modern consumer grade printers, this should be no more than about 5 minutes of printing.) I did not take into account re-seed issues. I should also have allowed the BC to just print the first 2 rounds to get things started.

The above three items caused a significant portion of delays Saturday morning. I think the BC lack of familiarity with the format & procedures caused other problems. Also, the lack of a controlling document that the BC & head ref could consult to answer almost any question on format or rules caused many small problems.

Other software problems that caused other delays:

- There was an error in how the individuals were sorted in results. This caused confusion, but ultimately the BC got things right for individual pools.
This also slowed down the generation of the individual pools.

- Results were generated in the program, which created a spreadsheet, which could be printed. This multi-step process caused some problems.

Not my software, but a software problem none-the-less:

- It was decided that promotion from the first round of individual pools to the second was to be done per pool (4 from each pool) instead of from the field. Neither I or anyone in the BC knew how to get Engarde to do this. (Fencing Time was considered and rejected. I don't remember why.) This caused the BC additional work.

I believe there were many other organizational and computer issues, and while I bear some responsibility for them, I will let others decide if to post and discuss them here.

W
Wafath is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 01:59 PM   #123
The Judge
 
noodle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,324
noodle has a reputation beyond reputenoodle has a reputation beyond reputenoodle has a reputation beyond reputenoodle has a reputation beyond reputenoodle has a reputation beyond reputenoodle has a reputation beyond reputenoodle has a reputation beyond reputenoodle has a reputation beyond reputenoodle has a reputation beyond reputenoodle has a reputation beyond reputenoodle has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wafath View Post
I believe that it was a contributing factor, adding to the chaos and confusion of getting things started, but I agree that all delays (or even most) can not be blamed on that.

Some of the reason to blame this is strategic: the lack of strips working on time could have easily gone from a delay to a show-stopper. The fact that we should have had ~ 75% more strips than needed, and we still did not have everything working on time probably got some people a bit panicky and irritated.

But I suspect a large portion of this blame was a face-saving measure. Since I believe that it is my face to save or expose, I will deconstruct some of the delays now.

Two words may be used to understand most of those delays: "Beta Software".

Itemizing how things went wrong:

- It took too long to enter in team rosters. Part of this can be blamed on a moderate software bug, (A problem with the data entry screen), but this was fairly easily worked around, and I suspect cost no more than 5 minutes. A larger part of the problem was that this aspect of the BC was not parallelized; all of this work was done on a single computer.

I thought that this would be acceptable, since teams were required to submit their rosters in advance. I thought that there would be roughly 20-40 additions, corrections & deletions, and the majority of these would be turned into the BC 15 minutes before the close of registration. I thought that this would allow this work to be done no later than 5 minutes after close of registration. I was wrong. I am not sure which assumption I was wrong with, but I suspect it was all of them.

- There was a user error (in this case the user was me) in setting up sabre pools. (This cascaded. See more below.)

- There was a serious software error in how certain pools were set up. All like combinations of # of strips & # of teams in a pool were hard-coded. the case of 10 teams on 5 strips had a problem. (I mis-transcribed #s.) This case happened on pool 3 of foil & epee. It was the best decision to make at the time. (this also cascaded. See more below.)

- The software only allowed the user to print all of the bout slips for all of the pools in a weapon, not one pool or one bout slip. This meant that the above to items cascaded down. It took roughly 55 pages of printing to send out an event. I calculated that this was acceptable on a single printer if this was started 20 minutes before teams were to report to strips. (on most modern consumer grade printers, this should be no more than about 5 minutes of printing.) I did not take into account re-seed issues. I should also have allowed the BC to just print the first 2 rounds to get things started.

The above three items caused a significant portion of delays Saturday morning. I think the BC lack of familiarity with the format & procedures caused other problems. Also, the lack of a controlling document that the BC & head ref could consult to answer almost any question on format or rules caused many small problems.

Other software problems that caused other delays:

- There was an error in how the individuals were sorted in results. This caused confusion, but ultimately the BC got things right for individual pools.
This also slowed down the generation of the individual pools.

- Results were generated in the program, which created a spreadsheet, which could be printed. This multi-step process caused some problems.

Not my software, but a software problem none-the-less:

- It was decided that promotion from the first round of individual pools to the second was to be done per pool (4 from each pool) instead of from the field. Neither I or anyone in the BC knew how to get Engarde to do this. (Fencing Time was considered and rejected. I don't remember why.) This caused the BC additional work.

I believe there were many other organizational and computer issues, and while I bear some responsibility for them, I will let others decide if to post and discuss them here.

W
as a software developer, all i can say is that it happens. it would only be embarrassing in my book if it blew up and caused the need to use paper and pencil, or a delay of more than 1 hour.
noodle is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
USACFC List Wafath Fencing Discussion 28 12-07-2006 07:30 PM
[Midatlantic US fencers]: BCAF July Competition Schedule now posted Dirk Goldgar Rec Sport Fencing 0 06-28-2003 09:00 PM
Philadelphia Div. USFA 2002-2003 Winter-Spring competition schedule posted Dirk Goldgar Fencing Discussion 0 03-10-2003 10:32 AM
Philadelphia Div. USFA 2002-2003 Winter-Spring competition schedule posted Dirk Goldgar Rec Sport Fencing 0 02-07-2003 12:41 AM
Philadelphia Div. USFA 2002-2003 Winter-Spring competition schedule posted Dirk Goldgar Rec Sport Fencing 0 02-07-2003 12:41 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 AM.


(c) 1995 - 2007 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 -    Medieval Swords from the online Replica Sword Shop