Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 46

Thread: Stimulating discussion about the Foil Lame bib

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    910
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Stimulating discussion about the Foil Lame bib

    Here is Barry's letter to British fencing which he has also just posted on fencingforum.com.

    The F.I.E. have just past some regulations stating that from 2009 foil bobs will be partially covered with lame which must be attached by a wire to the lame jacket .(Just like sabre) Here is a note which is an attempt to start a discussion of how U.K. fencing should implement these regulations.

    10/12/2007.
    Lame bibs at Foil.

    After the last F.I.E. Congress meeting it was decided that in 2009 foil fencers would have to have the valid target extended by including the bib, it is not yet decided exactly what will be the regulation coverage of the bib but best guess is a line drawn horizontally below the chin of the mask. Does this mean the regulation is being introduced mid season for some age groups?

    Although this seems a simple change there are a lot of problems associated with such a rule change, British fencing and the home countries will have to make a series of decisions and explain to the fencers within the next few months how U.K. fencing is going to manage/ embrace this proposed change. Not least the manufacturers and re-sellers of foil masks are going to have to decide what to make and sell to fencers in the coming year.

    To stimulate debate prior to some urgent decision making, here are some of the issues that need to be considered.

    Scope of Application.

    Traditionally U.K fencing has followed every new F.I.E. regulations. As 95% of U.K. fencing is not F.I.E. perhaps it is time to be more discerning or less slavish in following all F.I.E. regulations.
    1. Only F.I.E. events.
    2. Only British Championships and Ranking Opens.
    3. All electric size 5 fencing.
    4. All size 5 fencing
    5. All fencing.

    Time Scale.

    1. All on 1st January 2009.
    2. Staged? If so how and when?

    Safety Considerations and Permissible Design.

    Both the fencers and the manufacturers/re-sellers are going to have a problem in what to buy what to sell.

    Non-Electric fencing.

    1. Identification of valid area. At the moment there is no requirement to have the valid area delineated in any way. But if the valid target finishes in a horizontal line should this be marked in some way? On some fencers because of their physical shape of head neck and torso the line will not be horizontal when the mask is worn, is this OK?

    Electric Fencing.

    1. After consideration of the F.I.E. medical report regarding dangers near the throat, I understand it has been decided to limit the area of lame coverage to a straight line below the chin.
    2. It has been suggested that manufacturers can make a sort of sock that can be retro fitted onto an existing bib, however this is likely to leave an open seam between the lame and the bib surface unless the lame is some how attached to the bib surface continually. (This is not some thing which it is easy/possible to retro-fit.). Would an open pocket be acceptable? It could be argued we already have an open seam between the lame jacket and the fencers arm and this does not seem to cause any safety problems.
    3. If say from the new year we start adding a line of Velcro along the outer surface of the bib, at the proposed junction of the valid and non valid target, would this work? Would the epeeist decide this was a catching point at epee so we would now have to make masks for foil and different ones for epee?
    4. Connection between the foil lame bib and the jacket. It was originally suggested by the original Italian proposers of the new rule that if the lame was on the inside edge of the bib it would not be necessary to attach the bib to the jacket with a head wire. As the foil point hit the mask it would ensure contact between the mask and lame jacket. It has been decided that this was not safe as fencers would deliberately lift their head/bib away from the target to avoid being hit and this was unsafe as the neck would be exposed. I think that this is a typical argument made without any examination of real fencing and/or testing. I would like to see some experimentation of using the proposed bib with out a connection to see what actually happens. (I don’t think fencers have time to react and try to avoid hits by lifting their head when being attacked). It may be that the provision for such a lead needs to be made but only used by U.K fencers in F.I.E. events.
    5. If a mask lead is required do all lame jackets need a tag similar to sabre jackets.


    Barry Paul

  2. #2
    Senior Member erik_blank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Indiana, PA
    Posts
    2,678
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Wow. It is as if Barry was reading our discussions on F.net!

    Seriously, I am glad that this is going out from someone like Barry and it is being presented without the hyperbole that I am so inclined to use myself. (and others on this list seem to fall into also...)
    "Rub her feet!" - Lazarus Long, Time enough for Love, Robert A. Heinlein

    "Never moon a werewolf."
    Mike Binder

  3. #3
    Senior Member brtech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,600
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Suggestion for a safer way to connect the bib to the lame:

    Put a button (metal snap) on the bottom of the bib lame, and on the collar of the foil lame roughly center left (or right). Use a short coil cord to connect them. The cord would be under the bib. It would stretch out as the fencer removed the mask. A similar mechanism is commonly used in electronics repair to connect an ESD wrist strap to an ESD mat.

    I don't want to see a clip lead coming off the bib connecting to a tab on the back of the lame as in saber. Foil is a thrusting weapon and we will see many more entanglements of the cord with the opponent's blade.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Capt. Slo-mo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    3,689
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by brtech View Post
    Foil is a thrusting weapon and we will see many more entanglements of the cord with the opponent's blade.
    Well, see, there's the solution. Make foil a slashing weapon.

    If the "straight line across below the chin" concept comes to fruition, wouldn't something like an XChange mask bib with non-conductive material above the line and into the mask's bib groove work pretty well? And integrate into existing product lines?

    A lot of saber fencers hook the mask cord right onto the edge of the bib, and they don't lose too many cords to blade points. After all, there might be a net time delay improvement if a few chases after flipped cords replace all the off-target lights from the bib hits.
    "Sometimes we, as coaches, get into that dictator mode where you just tell and you don't listen and you don't try to understand them." Tom Izzo, Mich. St.
    "Fraud is the creation of trust. And then: its betrayal."
    William Black, Ph.D.

  5. #5
    Senior Member brtech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,600
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Typically, the mask cord is clipped to the bib at the top; well above where Alex says the cutoff line would be.

    We see A LOT of bib conductance failures where the clip goes (of course).

    If you don't thrust much, you are unlikely to get the cord tangled in the blade.
    If you do a lot of thrusting, especially if the cord is down below your chin, I think we'll see a lot more problems.

    Brian

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    910
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    We have made a mask with a bib that is lame inside and out and tested it tonight.

    It seems that all normally fenced hits to the lame part of the bib ring up valid.

    If you lift your head a fair bit then a normal speed hit still rings valid.

    If you lift your head a fair bit and the hit is really slow (non competitive speeds) it rings off target.

    I hope this is the way forward

  7. #7
    Senior Member fencerbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    near Boston
    Posts
    3,791
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by brtech View Post
    Typically, the mask cord is clipped to the bib at the top; well above where Alex says the cutoff line would be.

    We see A LOT of bib conductance failures where the clip goes (of course).

    If you don't thrust much, you are unlikely to get the cord tangled in the blade.
    If you do a lot of thrusting, especially if the cord is down below your chin, I think we'll see a lot more problems.

    Brian
    For years I connected my mask cord to a wire loop riveted to my Sabre mask up near my ear. Worked well and didn't get knocked off.

    Why not make a Lame cloth loop on the inside of the bib? There would be a place to put it where a sewing machine could sew on a replacement.

    Since this kind of failure is such a common cause for mask rejections, it would be a big plus for fencers.
    Whoopee! My avatar is back.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    910
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    I don't think you want a crock clip near your face!

    Some sort of snaps would be better but I am not sure what sort of resistance thay are.

    The test mask with lame both sides seemed to work fine so maybe if we can get eome more people testing them we may have a cheaper easier solution.

  9. #9
    Senior Member fencerbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    near Boston
    Posts
    3,791
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex_Paul View Post
    I don't think you want a crock clip near your face!

    Some sort of snaps would be better but I am not sure what sort of resistance thay are.

    The test mask with lame both sides seemed to work fine so maybe if we can get eome more people testing them we may have a cheaper easier solution.
    I used the wire loops for about 8 years and have put them on at least 50 of the masks I have refurbished.

    Not a single complaint. Or maybe they just cut them off if they didn't like them. It is true that some didn't use them. I could tell they were unused when the masks came back again to be redone.

    In contrast, many of the fencers complained when the wire loops broke off.

    The FIE is quite specific about requiring elastic on Lame on gloves and manchettes to ensure reliable contact. I don't know if they will be happy about depending on casual contact between your underflaps and Lame jackets.

    You do realize that there will be complaints from opponents about touches not being properly recorded.
    Last edited by fencerbill; 12-13-2007 at 10:12 AM.
    Whoopee! My avatar is back.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    934
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex_Paul View Post
    We have made a mask with a bib that is lame inside and out and tested it tonight.

    It seems that all normally fenced hits to the lame part of the bib ring up valid.

    If you lift your head a fair bit then a normal speed hit still rings valid.

    If you lift your head a fair bit and the hit is really slow (non competitive speeds) it rings off target.

    I hope this is the way forward
    Hi Alex

    Sounds like a good solution. Was it an x-change mask? Also did the fencers in question feel it changed the way the fenced at all, i.e. making the "ironing board" less viable etc.
    Beauty is not the goal of competitive sports, but high-level sports are a prime venue for the expression of human beauty. The relation is roughly that of courage to war.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    660
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    iI was an exchange mask worn by me and others, who complained because when there were hit on the bib the valid light came up.

  12. #12
    Senior Member fencerbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    near Boston
    Posts
    3,791
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    I wanted to make sure you understood what I had proposed as an alternate to your underflaps so I have included a couple of pictures.

    My proposal would have applicability to Sabre as well as the proposed Foil conductive bib. It would ameliorate the existing problem of wear on Sabre bibs from attaching the mask cord. This design should last as long as the loop on a Lame. My placement of the loop might not be the exact best location. It would be easier to tell with it on a full bib.

    I am sure you could do a better job than my quick runup. But it wouldn't be too hard for you to make one for your testers to try.

    For FIE purposes, the loop is 2 cm by 3 cm.

    This design could be expected to reduce the frequency of mask cords coming off bibs. Which would improve the orderly running of the bouts.
    Last edited by fencerbill; 12-19-2008 at 01:36 PM.
    Whoopee! My avatar is back.

  13. #13
    Senior Member SJCFU#2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    2,898
    Reviews
    Read 5 Reviews
    Looking at these pictures brings up a question.

    Since presumably it would be desirable for the cord would be on the non-weapon side, would it be necessary to provide two tabs (one on each side) to accommodate both left and right-handed fencers or would bibs be designated for left or right handed use?

  14. #14
    Senior Member fencerbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    near Boston
    Posts
    3,791
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by SJCFU#2 View Post
    Looking at these pictures brings up a question.

    Since presumably it would be desirable for the cord would be on the non-weapon side, would it be necessary to provide two tabs (one on each side) to accommodate both left and right-handed fencers or would bibs be designated for left or right handed use?
    Excellent point. The pictures were just to make sure that people understood what I had expressed in words before.

    But what do you think about such loops as an alternate for the underflaps that LP has suggested? And it might be better to have them either further up or lower down, have to look at them on the mask on the fencer.

    Alex would know better than I would. But adding such loops to Sabre masks would probably not increase the cost to produce by more than a couple of dollars. And it could avoid the present real problem of the bibs going bad where people now hook on the mask cord. And avoid some of the delays from mask cords coming off masks.
    Whoopee! My avatar is back.

  15. #15
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    12,731
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    I think adding some padding to the rear frame (to give the clip some grip) preferable as being farther back and less likely to be hit. Also even less likely to go bad than a loop.

  16. #16
    Senior Member fencerbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    near Boston
    Posts
    3,791
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by KD5MDK View Post
    I think adding some padding to the rear frame (to give the clip some grip) preferable as being farther back and less likely to be hit. Also even less likely to go bad than a loop.
    The clip will be under the bib, how can it be hit?

    How often does the tab or loop on the back of a Sabre Lame go bad?
    Whoopee! My avatar is back.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    910
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Well the trial mask as it is has gone off to a training camp to be tested. We ars so busy with pre christmas stuff that I am not sure we can do much more experimentation until the new year.

    The tab is a possible certainly but would need extensive testing. Provision would certainly have to be made for both right and left handed fencers. It may be better to permanently attach the wire to the bib on the mask side...

  18. #18
    Posting Hound Purple Fencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Panorama City, ca USA
    Posts
    12,391
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex_Paul View Post
    It may be better to permanently attach the wire to the bib on the mask side...
    Actually, it might be better for Roch to stop #$^!$# with foil in the first place!
    Need fencing equipment? See me at H.O.M. Fencing Supply

    Going to your first tournament? Read "Choose yer weapon, Laddie (or: Dude, where's my foil?)"

  19. #19
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    12,731
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by fencerbill View Post
    The clip will be under the bib, how can it be hit?

    How often does the tab or loop on the back of a Sabre Lame go bad?
    I'd missed the part about it being under the bib, I thought it would be hanging below it.

    I've seen several lames with failed tabs.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    934
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    For fencers required to use the wireless system won't a wire coming from the unit on the back of their mask combined with another from the bib make the mask very difficult to put on and take off? Hopefully a lame only solution will work.
    Beauty is not the goal of competitive sports, but high-level sports are a prime venue for the expression of human beauty. The relation is roughly that of courage to war.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Best INOX Foil Lame?
    By Cookeit in forum Armory - Q&A
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-27-2007, 02:29 PM
  2. First Foil Lame
    By JaneCaulfield in forum Armory - Q&A
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-17-2006, 12:08 PM
  3. I want to buy a foil and lame'!
    By BruceT in forum Trading Post
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-08-2004, 04:15 PM
  4. FS: Foil lame, men's, like new
    By Ordway in forum Trading Post
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-13-2004, 07:55 PM
  5. Women's Foil World Champs Preview: Discussion
    By Craig in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-22-2003, 02:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26