Qualifier participation eligibility - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > General Fencing > Fencing Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2007, 06:07 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 621
little_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to little_old_me
Qualifier participation eligibility

I have a question that was originally brought to my attention a few years ago. In the 2006 South Carolina Divisionals, two fencers who were members of a North Carolina club participated in Men's Epee. I asked how these two were allowed to compete, not being members of a club in the division, and I was told that if they were legal SC residents, they could fence in the Divisional Qualifier. Is this actually the case? I've looked through the rules and handbook and don't see this listed anywhere. If this is the case, would the same eligibility rules be followed for JO qualifiers? That is, if there is a fencer who is a member of a club in South Carolina, but who lives in Georgia, could that individual register for the GA qualifiers?
__________________
Just because it's funny:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt. Slo-mo
If you don't want to lose fencing privileges at USFA-sanctioned events, then refrain from throwing flamagels at those events.
little_old_me is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 12-04-2007, 06:20 PM   #2
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 8,949
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
A fencer may register for the division in which they live, the division in which a club to which they belong is located, OR the division in which they attend school. The decision of which division to belong to must be made for the entire season (barring approval from the BoD for exceptional circumstances).

-B
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:15 PM   #3
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,177
KD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to KD5MDK
What did it say when you checked their USFA membership?
KD5MDK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:52 PM   #4
Member
 
Derobement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 39
Derobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud of
See Brad's response above. This is a pretty common situation here in the NJ Division. For example, in our recent JO Qualifiers we had a number of NJ Division members competing who are members of clubs in the Metropolitan Division or in the South Jersey Division. (why they wouldn't opt to be members of one of those divisions where JO and SN (other than Div I) qualification comes much easier is probably a better question)
Derobement is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 08:22 PM   #5
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 8,949
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derobement View Post
(why they wouldn't opt to be members of one of those divisions where JO and SN (other than Div I) qualification comes much easier is probably a better question)
They get a more worthwhile tournament in the NJD quals than the SoJ or Metro Quals.

I'd pick a better event over easier qualification.

-B
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 12:33 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 621
little_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud oflittle_old_me has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to little_old_me
Gotcha, I see it now. So even if you're a member of another division's club, you can register as a member of the division where you live. And vice versa. Then you can only qualify through your registered division. Makes sense. Thanks!
__________________
Just because it's funny:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt. Slo-mo
If you don't want to lose fencing privileges at USFA-sanctioned events, then refrain from throwing flamagels at those events.
little_old_me is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 02:18 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
bunbury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 367
bunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by oiuyt View Post
They get a more worthwhile tournament in the NJD quals than the SoJ or Metro Quals.

I'd pick a better event over easier qualification.

-B
Which is exactly why you'd want an easier path to the better event (the JOs).
bunbury is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 02:36 AM   #8
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 8,949
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunbury View Post
Which is exactly why you'd want an easier path to the better event (the JOs).
I prefer stronger events whether they're qualifiers or not. It's up to me to earn my way into the national event if I want to compete at that level.

If I enjoy the challenge of competition why would I want to cheapen my own experience by trying to find ways to skate through?

-B
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 02:18 PM   #9
Member
 
Derobement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 39
Derobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud ofDerobement has much to be proud of
Just to be clear so that no one gets offended, I wasn't knocking the quality of fencers in SoJersey or Metro, just the quantity. (I'd suspect that both those divisions have among the highest calibre fencers on a per capita basis.) I don't think there were more than 8 participants in any of the SoJersey qualifiers, so anyone who showed up qualified. Metro was better in terms of turn out, but not much - I think they still had many more qualify than not.

It looks like both the North and South Carolina JO Qualifiers had roughly similar turnouts to the Metro division - so in the OP's situation, the choice of division wouldn't have be motivated by ease of qualification since most people who showed up qualified in either division. Probably just a location of club/school vs. location of residence issue.
Derobement is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 02:52 PM   #10
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 8,949
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derobement View Post
Just to be clear so that no one gets offended, I wasn't knocking the quality of fencers in SoJersey or Metro, just the quantity. (I'd suspect that both those divisions have among the highest calibre fencers on a per capita basis.).
I think that was fairly clear from the earlier discussion.

Looking at SoJ results only 4 events (CMF, JMF, JMS, JWF) had more than 3 entries (and therefore potential for non-qualifiers). I don't know whether or not any of those entered were auto-qualed.

In JMF all of the qualifiers had B classifications. Not that easy to break into.

JMS included a B and 2 C's (one of whom did not qualify).

The non-qualifying JWF fencer has a C.

So it depends on what one considers easy qualification. And whether one is looking at the events where everyone qualifies or those where there is small, top-weighted competitions with few slots available.

Personally I'd still favor going after larger, stronger events, but that's just because they're more fun.

-B

*background note: I'm a member of SoJersey Division although I don't anticipate trying to qualify to any national event through division-level qualification paths (indeed, there's only one such event in which I'm eligible to attempt qualification), although that may change, depending on what plans I make for San Jose.*
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tournament participation? UnorthodoxEpeeist Fencing Discussion 16 02-11-2007 09:36 PM
NCAA Eligibility dreamer90024 Fencing Discussion 17 04-25-2006 01:25 AM
Sabre participation sabreur Fencing Discussion 12 10-25-2002 12:43 PM
NAC Eligibility Foil Girl Discussion Archive 4 08-13-2001 08:07 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 PM.


(c) 1995 - 2007 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 -    Medieval Swords from the online Replica Sword Shop