2007 Fencing World Championships DVDs - Page 3 - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > General Fencing > Fencing Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-22-2007, 04:58 PM   #41
Senior Member
 
bunbury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 367
bunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond repute
I think you're doing something wrong. 1 hr of HD should be ~500mb...

Last edited by bunbury; 12-23-2007 at 12:56 AM.
bunbury is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 12-22-2007, 09:07 PM   #42
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,151
KD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to KD5MDK
If HD video is ~500MB/hr, why did we have to wait for HD-DVD and Blu-Ray for HD movies? Why wouldn't they fit on 4.7GB minimum regular DVDs?

DV video, which is mostly uncompressed, is 17GB/hr. How good of a compression ratio do you think is reasonable? It's rare you see one over 10:1.

I'm going to ignore entirely your feelings of entitlement to other people's work.
KD5MDK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 12:55 AM   #43
Senior Member
 
bunbury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 367
bunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by KD5MDK View Post
If HD video is ~500MB/hr, why did we have to wait for HD-DVD and Blu-Ray for HD movies? Why wouldn't they fit on 4.7GB minimum regular DVDs?

DV video, which is mostly uncompressed, is 17GB/hr. How good of a compression ratio do you think is reasonable? It's rare you see one over 10:1.
1hr = 10gb in MPEG-2/you don't know what you're doing. It's possible to hit 10gb with TrueHD and MPEG-2, but that's massive overkill of anything.
bunbury is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 11:02 AM   #44
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,151
KD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to KD5MDK
10:1 would be 1.7GB/hr, not 10.
KD5MDK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 03:54 PM   #45
Senior Member
 
Capt. Slo-mo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,402
Capt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond reputeCapt. Slo-mo has a reputation beyond repute
Well, actually, if we're talking HDV with minimal compression, you're looking at about 13 gigs per hour of tape. Do some edits, add some graphics, and it gets much bigger, in a hurry.

Full blown HD is more than a gig a minute, some codecs can balloon up to 4 gigs a minute. That adds up pretty quick.

Sure, you can scrunch anything down with monster compression, but then you lose the benefits of the HD or HDV source video. I know guys who've burned HD material onto a standard DVD...but you get about 4 minutes worth.

When the double-sided burners form HD-DVD or Blu-Ray get the bugs worked out, then you can start getting close to an hour of top quality video per disc, with minimal compression.
__________________
"Fraud is the creation of trust. And then: its betrayal."
William Black, Ph.D.
Capt. Slo-mo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 04:33 PM   #46
Senior Member
 
bunbury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 367
bunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond reputebunbury has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt. Slo-mo View Post
Well, actually, if we're talking HDV with minimal compression, you're looking at about 13 gigs per hour of tape. Do some edits, add some graphics, and it gets much bigger, in a hurry.

Full blown HD is more than a gig a minute, some codecs can balloon up to 4 gigs a minute. That adds up pretty quick.

Sure, you can scrunch anything down with monster compression, but then you lose the benefits of the HD or HDV source video. I know guys who've burned HD material onto a standard DVD...but you get about 4 minutes worth.

When the double-sided burners form HD-DVD or Blu-Ray get the bugs worked out, then you can start getting close to an hour of top quality video per disc, with minimal compression.
Sure, 20 mbps H.264 or VC-1 will get you your 1gig/minute, but it can still be cut down with MPEG-4. I think they would be good to go if they just took the finals (and possibly semi-finals) in HD and left the rest to regular.
bunbury is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
World Championships 2007 Final Vids Ignition Fencing Discussion 37 11-26-2007 03:15 AM
2007 World Championships - "Official" Thread Craig Fencing Discussion 229 10-10-2007 05:07 PM
Asian Fencing Championships 2007 lurkerdad Fencing Discussion 3 08-23-2007 10:33 PM
Fencing World Championships 2007 jbenjamin Fencing Discussion 3 04-04-2007 05:29 PM
2003 World Champs DVDs Craig Fencing Discussion 24 10-28-2003 10:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 AM.


(c) 1995 - 2007 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 -    Medieval Swords from the online Replica Sword Shop