08-18-2007, 12:58 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Illinois
Posts: 133
| Schools of Fencing I have heard a lot of things about the different schools of fencing, so now I wonder, "What are the different schools of fencing?  what differentiates them from others?  " |
| | | And now for this message... | |
08-18-2007, 01:47 PM
|
#2 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,658
| Answering this will require approximately 300 posts.
There are as many schools of fencing as there are languages. However, due to regulation that even predates the FIE (and is thus written down as Appendix 0 to the rules), only one school per language is allowed. Hungarian, Russian, Polish, Italian and French schools have all be prominent in the past. The Serbo-Croatian school achieved temporary prominence, but it actually was a bunch of Italians who didn't want to follow the Italian school and so rented another language to prove their ideas. They were assimilated with the capture of Trieste in 1918.
The sleeper up and comer is the Sorbian school, being as it has the advantages of being in Germany but not actually German.
Last edited by KD5MDK; 08-18-2007 at 01:50 PM..
|
| |
08-18-2007, 06:23 PM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 319
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jbenjamin I have heard a lot of things about the different schools of fencing, so now I wonder, "What are the different schools of fencing?  what differentiates them from others?  " | KD5's joking comment is basically riight: a "school" is a national, or sometimes a regional, style or tradition of fencing instruction. Frequently it is promulgated by nationally recognized institutions and recorded in widely accepted textbooks.
The following is offered tentatively and I invite correction by those who are more knowledgeable than I:
Naturally, the techniques taught tend to overlap, because obviously wrong actions don't work. But the terminology may differ, and there may be differences in the underlying philosophy.
From the Renaissance through the 19th century, there were the Spanish, Italian, and French schools. In the first part of the 20th c, there were distinct French and Italian schools, preferring different grips in the thrusting weapons, using different terminology, recommending different hand and en garde positions, and recognizing slightly different actions. There also developed a distinctive Hungarian school (developed from the Italian) in sabre. In addition, a Hungarian school in foil and epee seems to have combined French and Italian elements.
In the second half of the 20th century, East Bloc fencers introduced an eclectic school of fencing based on unpecented levels of physical training, with an emphasis on footwork. The success of this style led to its physical elements being adopted world-wide.
Today, the actual practice of high-level fencers tends to converge, although the different schools retain differences of terminology. |
| |
08-19-2007, 12:11 AM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 349
| Like ysbadadden said, a lot of the techniques are the same but have sleightly different execution. I know that the two big ones I hear about are French and Italian. Italian tends to rely on power and can be really big most of the time from what I have seen. The parries are a little bigger so that they not only move the blade but hit it out of the way completly.
The second is French style. I relys on smaller quicker actions and uses a more mehodical method and seems to be more tactical.
A second that I have heard mentioned is Russian which is basically beat fleche. Beat fleche. Beat fleche.
I am open to correction on these. I don't want to be posting bad info.
__________________ ------(l-- Lefthanded --l)------ |
| |
08-19-2007, 12:38 AM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: the Salle(I no longer have a home address)
Posts: 1,332
| Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftHanded A second that I have heard mentioned is Russian which is basically beat fleche. Beat fleche. Beat fleche. | That is really OVER simplifying. My coach was trained in Kiev and I want you to know that we first learned the on-guard position and then then fleche. 
__________________ J Jefferies |
| |
08-20-2007, 07:43 AM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 349
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jjefferies That is really OVER simplifying. | Isn't there a proverb about a fool and his many words?
__________________ ------(l-- Lefthanded --l)------ |
| |
08-20-2007, 08:10 AM
|
#7 | | Curmudgeon Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Somewhere in your nightmares!
Posts: 25,961
| I resent that remark.
__________________
Use the Shift key, people! Keyboard manufacturers everywhere are ineffably saddened when you ignore what they made just for you!
|
| |
08-20-2007, 01:58 PM
|
#8 | | Just Joined
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23
| Sadly I have never seen a competition fencer using one of these styles.
So what school would the modern style of fencing fall into? Freearms hanging like noodles, bent arm lunges, useless bouncing-around-footwork and no sense of distance? |
| |
08-20-2007, 02:04 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Houston/Galveston, Texas, USA
Posts: 552
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbadadden From the Renaissance through the 19th century, there were the Spanish, Italian, and French schools. In the first part of the 20th c, there were distinct French and Italian schools, preferring different grips in the thrusting weapons, using different terminology, recommending different hand and en garde positions, and recognizing slightly different actions. | In the 1930s most of the schools and clubs in the North Texas area taught the Spanish school of fencing... Campeche Steel: A Sport Evolves Campeche Steel: The Goodstein & D'Albergo Years
Last edited by schlager7; 08-20-2007 at 02:09 PM..
|
| |
08-20-2007, 02:26 PM
|
#10 | | Super Shoebie
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: VA
Posts: 1,089
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormus Sadly I have never seen a competition fencer using one of these styles.
So what school would the modern style of fencing fall into? Freearms hanging like noodles, bent arm lunges, useless bouncing-around-footwork and no sense of distance? | Careful now...there's some loaded vocabulary in your post. I'd say it's pretty safe to say Cassara's Italian and Le Pechoux French...
I'd also say the definition of the various schools would most likely be decided by the most accomplished members of those schools...
Last edited by chefencer; 08-20-2007 at 02:27 PM..
Reason: OCD
|
| |
08-20-2007, 02:33 PM
|
#11 | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,090
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormus Sadly I have never seen a competition fencer using one of these styles.
So what school would the modern style of fencing fall into? Freearms hanging like noodles, bent arm lunges, useless bouncing-around-footwork and no sense of distance? | Oh man you're a funny guy. |
| |
08-20-2007, 05:24 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Illinois
Posts: 133
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormus Sadly I have never seen a competition fencer using one of these styles.
So what school would the modern style of fencing fall into? Freearms hanging like noodles, bent arm lunges, useless bouncing-around-footwork and no sense of distance? | hmmm.. Epee??? jk jk jk...  |
| |
08-20-2007, 05:46 PM
|
#13 | | Possibly a haberdasher?
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 6,031
| The American school of fencing is defined by crappy footwork.
(A. Abend, I believe)
__________________
lol wut?
|
| |
08-20-2007, 05:47 PM
|
#14 | | Possibly a haberdasher?
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 6,031
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormus Sadly I have never seen a competition fencer using one of these styles.
So what school would the modern style of fencing fall into? Freearms hanging like noodles, bent arm lunges, useless bouncing-around-footwork and no sense of distance? | Sorry that you don't consider "not being absolutely terrible because you want to conform to Victorian ideals" a valid approach to a sport.
__________________
lol wut?
|
| |
08-20-2007, 05:50 PM
|
#15 | | gother than thou
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 972
| Quote:
Originally Posted by telkanuru Sorry that you don't consider "not being absolutely terrible because you want to conform to Victorian ideals" a valid approach to a sport. | The winner - it is you.
__________________ Destroy everything you touch today
Destroy me this way
Anything that may desert you
So it cannot hurt you |
| |
08-20-2007, 07:02 PM
|
#16 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,658
| Quote:
Originally Posted by telkanuru The American school of fencing is defined by crappy footwork.
(A. Abend, I believe) | It makes you wonder where our successes come from... |
| |
08-20-2007, 07:34 PM
|
#17 | | Possibly a haberdasher?
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 6,031
| Quote:
Originally Posted by KD5MDK It makes you wonder where our successes come from... | Bladework and speed. Watch the USA vs FRA epee team bout from the '04 olympics. The French tear us a new one on tempo and timing.
__________________
lol wut?
|
| |
08-21-2007, 12:10 PM
|
#18 | | Just Joined
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23
| Quote:
Originally Posted by KD5MDK It makes you wonder where our successes come from... | So, does this mean that the purpose of fencing is to win...I was under the silly old "victorian" delusion that the purpose of fencing was to learn and practice the proper art of swordplay.  |
| |
08-21-2007, 12:15 PM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Illinois
Posts: 133
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormus So, does this mean that the purpose of fencing is to win...I was under the silly old "victorian" delusion that the purpose of fencing was to learn and practice the proper art of swordplay.  |
those were the days  ... i see a lot of "Victorian-ish Swordplay" in foil though.. maybe you should join us if you haven't..  |
| |
08-21-2007, 12:18 PM
|
#20 | | Just Joined
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23
| Quote:
Originally Posted by telkanuru Sorry that you don't consider "not being absolutely terrible because you want to conform to Victorian ideals" a valid approach to a sport. | You automatically assume that I consider fencing a sport. And further more, classical fencing style goes back much further than the Victorian period. As a matter of fact, the Victorian era is where dueling reached its steady decline.
Do you practice the lunge? Well the lunge was popularized by Ferro in the 14 century. I guess that makes all fencers stodgy and outdated? No, swordplay has adopted and held on to certain techniques for thousands of years, not because they are classic but because they worked when dueling with sharps. Just because certain methods and styles have been popularized within the last couple of decades doesn't make them part of the fencing canon. Modern fencing has never been a "popular" sport and never will be, it is not meant to be, because true fencing is much more than just a sport, it is an art. |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 AM. |