Zivkovic grips: Suggestions

[fencerbill]

Because I think every person who writes on forums should read my previous post—no matter what the thread content is.

Sorry—but it's just greatly annoying to me to see such disregard and decline of language due to the growing dependence of spell check functions, or the lack thereof.

Wow, aren't we lucky to have someone like this to remind us, and with a total of 12 posts!

[mrbiggs]

Because I think every person who writes on forums should read my previous post—no matter what the thread content is.

Sorry—but it's just greatly annoying to me to see such disregard and decline of language due to the growing dependence of spell check functions, or the lack thereof.

dependence of spell check functions

You can't have a dependence of something.

The spelling on this forum is pretty darn good. Every once in awhile someone will miss a homophone; it happens. It's a lot easier to do then getting a preposition wrong.

[Barry Paul]

I have to agree with CvilleFencer that any particular handle is not the magic answer to turning a club fencers into a world class performer.
Most if not all world class fencers would still win whatever handle they used.

I wonder if as foil fencing becomes more classical the french handle will make a come back.

With a comment regarding the cost of our G Pro, sales are always going to be low with this sort of specialist product, tooling cost are high, and we pay a royalty to G. The handle will last the life of the fencer so the actual cost per hour use is virtually zero. So if it is the handle that works for a fencer the purchase price is not of prime importance.

[Gav]

EEK.
Didn't realise that this was a thread back from the dead... I've already made my opinion abundantly clear...

Nothing new appears to have been added to this thread at the moment.

Apart from someone trolling about spelling and grammar.