topleft topright

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22
  1. #1
    Moderator Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    11,971

    FIE adopts USFA non-combativity rule ;)

    Well not exactly, but they're now in step with us in terms of not giving black cards:
    t.87.5 and followings, application 1st of March 2007
    .5 Individual events
    a) When both fencers make clear their unwillingness to fight * during the two first periods of a
    direct elimination bout, the Referee will award a warning (yellow card) against each of the two
    fencers and will proceed to the next period, without the minute rest.
    b) In case of repeated offence, the Referee will award at each time a penalty hit (red card)
    against each of the two fencers and will proceed to the next period, without the minute rest.
    c) When both fencers make clear their unwillingness to fight * during the third period of a direct
    elimination bout :
    i) if the offence was not committed during the course of the preceding periods, the Referee will
    award a warning (yellow card) against each of the fencer, and will proceed to the last minute * of
    the time allowed for the bout ;
    ii) if the offence was already committed during the course of the preceding periods, the Referee
    will award a penalty hit (red card) against each of the fencer, and will proceed to the last minute *
    of the time allowed for the bout.
    This last minute*, which will be fenced in its entirety, will be decisive and will be preceded by a
    drawing of lots to decide the winner should the scores be equal at the end of the minute.
    6 Team events
    a) When both teams make clear their unwillingness to fight * during a team match, the Referee
    will award a warning (yellow card) against both of the teams and will proceed to the next bout.
    b) In case of repeated offence, the Referee will award at each time a penalty hit (red card)
    against both of the teams and will proceed to the next bout, and this up to the last bout.
    c) When both teams make clear their unwillingness to fight * during the last bout :
    i) if the offence was not committed during the course of the preceding bouts, the Referee will
    award a warning (yellow card) against both of the teams, and will proceed to the last minute * of
    the time allowed for the bout ;
    ii) if the offence was already committed during the course of the preceding bouts, the Referee
    will award a penalty hit (red card) against both of the teams, and will proceed to the last minute *
    of the time allowed for the bout.
    This last minute*, which will be fenced in its entirety, will be decisive and will be preceded by a
    drawing of lots to decide the winner should the scores be equal at the end of the minute.
    The only thing ambigious here is whether or not the "yellow card" is the same as the ones you would get for an ordinary offense. Downunder has argued it isn't and I can see his point with this wording, although I don't support it.

    Criteria for non-combativity are also defined:
    Clear unwillingness to fight (non-combativity) *
    If two of the criteria below are combined, there is unwillingness to fight :
    1. criterion of time : one minute of fight without hit
    2. absence of iron contact
    3. excessive distance (superior to the distance of a step-forward-lunge)[/
    That's very interesting.

  2. #2
    Fencing Expert Array oiuyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Pennsauken, NJ
    Posts
    11,810
    Interestingly, when non-combativity is called for the first time in the last period/encounter the bout is advanced to the final minute, but without drawing of lots. Which would seem to imply that the final minute in that case is not necessarily decisive and overtime can still occur.

    Also new definition for what it is that should dramatically reduce these calls (close to back to what we had with passivity). Score a hit each minute and periodically clang blades and you're good. Or stay relatively close to each other and periodically clang blades and you don't even have to score a hit.

    -B
    "Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array Chafunkta's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The Driftwood Bar, Louisiana
    Posts
    508
    So if one fencer already has a yellow (say, for covering target), and then the two fencers become "non-combatants," does the referee give a yellow to the fencer without any infractions and a red to the one that covered target?

    I think this is what KD5MDK was getting at, but I don't know if the ambiguity was ever cleared up by the USFA or FIE.
    Just push the button!

  4. #4
    Fencing Expert Array edew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    CA area
    Posts
    8,326
    I would assume so for an individual bout.

    In the team match, would that apply? Is the team yellow equivalent to a yellow to all individuals of the team?
    =)=///

  5. #5
    Moderator Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    11,971
    In the USFA, yes. Because we apply rules sanely.

    Edit: I was replying to Chafunkta, not edew.
    Last edited by KD5MDK; 02-09-2007 at 03:57 PM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    NJ, USA
    Posts
    1,575
    Quote Originally Posted by oiuyt View Post
    Interestingly, when non-combativity is called for the first time in the last period/encounter the bout is advanced to the final minute, but without drawing of lots. Which would seem to imply that the final minute in that case is not necessarily decisive and overtime can still occur.
    That's not the way I read the post. I took the bit saying

    This last minute*, which will be fenced in its entirety, will be decisive and will be preceded by a
    drawing of lots to decide the winner should the scores be equal at the end of the minute.
    to apply to all cases of noncombativeness in the final period.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    1,233
    I'm looking forwad to the return of the epic 1-0 epee matches.

    Quote Originally Posted by oiuyt View Post
    Interestingly, when non-combativity is called for the first time in the last period/encounter the bout is advanced to the final minute, but without drawing of lots. Which would seem to imply that the final minute in that case is not necessarily decisive and overtime can still occur.

    Also new definition for what it is that should dramatically reduce these calls (close to back to what we had with passivity). Score a hit each minute and periodically clang blades and you're good. Or stay relatively close to each other and periodically clang blades and you don't even have to score a hit.

    -B
    Go to the well until the well is dry. When the well is dry find a new well.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    1,233
    Good thing it says hit and not score. Foil can go lengthy periods with no scores
    Go to the well until the well is dry. When the well is dry find a new well.

  9. #9
    Fencing Expert Array oiuyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Pennsauken, NJ
    Posts
    11,810
    Quote Originally Posted by notalent View Post
    Good thing it says hit and not score. Foil can go lengthy periods with no scores
    French version of the letter:

    1. critère de temps : une minute de combat sans touche
    Judging from the way the word is used in the (french version of) the rulebook, "touche" refers to both valid and non-valid hits.

    -B
    Last edited by oiuyt; 02-09-2007 at 07:29 PM.
    "Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array IanSerotkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    563
    Clear unwillingness to fight (non-combativity) *
    If two of the criteria below are combined, there is unwillingness to fight :
    1. criterion of time : one minute of fight without hit
    2. absence of iron contact
    3. excessive distance (superior to the distance of a step-forward-lunge)[/
    So if my opponent and I stand at regular distance and hold our blades together, we cannot be called for non-combativity since we avoid #2 and #3? Even if we stand like that for the entire three periods of a DE bout? Awesome.

  11. #11
    Fencing Expert Array oiuyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Pennsauken, NJ
    Posts
    11,810
    Makes for stellar television, doesn't it.

    -B
    "Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"

  12. #12
    Senior Member Array peet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    2,187
    Non-combativity is the yappy little dog of the fencing rules:

    Annoying, can't make up its mind, can't sit still, makes lots of noise & trouble at inconvenient times, and piddles on the carpet if you look at it wrong.


    -p

  13. #13
    Senior Member Array larkmaj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    South Shore
    Posts
    958
    I was going to say that the yellow card is a normal yellow card (except in team matches, where it carries over) but with the way the rule is worded I would be more tempted to go the other way. Again with the clear and concise rules.

  14. #14
    Fencing Expert Array downunder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by larkmaj View Post
    I was going to say that the yellow card is a normal yellow card (except in team matches, where it carries over) but with the way the rule is worded I would be more tempted to go the other way. Again with the clear and concise rules.


    Internationally it is an Ungrouped Yellow Card, so a further Group 1 offence produces a 2nd yellow card.

    Not sure what the US does.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Array oso97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,904
    Quote Originally Posted by downunder View Post
    Internationally it is an Ungrouped Yellow Card, so a further Group 1 offence produces a 2nd yellow card.
    Citation?
    That's it, I'm done with the discussion forums on F.net. It's had its uses, but the ideologues, ranters, and "experts" have drowned too many of the conversations. I'm changing my password to something random and never logging in again.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Array carlos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    173

    "ungrouped yellow"

    Quote Originally Posted by downunder View Post
    Internationally it is an Ungrouped Yellow Card, so a further Group 1 offence produces a 2nd yellow card.

    Not sure what the US does.
    Using the September, 2006 USFA rules (the most recent posted), I see nothing about an ungrouped yellow card. (in t.87 or elsewhere) Is this new? When was it issued?

  17. #17
    Senior Member Array Capt. Slo-mo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    3,586
    Quote Originally Posted by oiuyt View Post
    Makes for stellar television, doesn't it.
    Two fencers, mano-a-mano, blades pressed together....what could make it perfect Sergio Leone TV?

    Visor Masks!!

    Think of the acceleratingly paced eye close-ups, the beads of sweat dripping across fevered brows...

    Visor Masks!
    "Sometimes we, as coaches, get into that dictator mode where you just tell and you don't listen and you don't try to understand them." Tom Izzo, Mich. St.
    "Fraud is the creation of trust. And then: its betrayal."
    William Black, Ph.D.

  18. #18
    Fencing Expert Array downunder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by oso97 View Post
    Citation?
    The penalty chart, and that i was told this by my colleagues in the UK and Australia, two of which refereed at Torino last year.

    edit: http://www.britishfencing.com/Attach...rningsheet.pdf
    Last edited by downunder; 02-10-2007 at 01:00 AM.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Array carlos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    173

    thanks

    Ah-ha, the penalty chart issued by the USFA is different from the one from BFA.

  20. #20
    Fencing Expert Array downunder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by carlos View Post
    Ah-ha, the penalty chart issued by the USFA is different from the one from BFA.
    Thats because you guys play to a different set of rules, as already discussed.

Similar Threads

  1. Non-combativity
    By rsy in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 11-27-2006, 10:54 AM
  2. New USFA 2004 Rule book (11/04 edition)
    By JEC in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-20-2004, 12:54 AM
  3. is the new rule book been post on USFA yet?
    By vincikai in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-09-2004, 12:12 PM
  4. Usfa Rule Book
    By Mergs in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-11-2003, 05:25 PM
  5. USFA rule t.35 (Chapter 6)...uh-oh.
    By edew in forum Discussion Archive
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 09-19-2001, 05:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30