topleft topright

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 61 to 72 of 72
  1. #61
    Senior Member Array jBirch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Carstairs, AB, Canada
    Posts
    3,467
    Maybe. What did we decide?

    James.
    If it's stupid, but it works, it's not stupid.

  2. #62
    Moderator Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    12,167
    I have the notion that the thread felt the touch stood, but I can't find the thread and it's driving me nuts. It happened in either Washington (Seattle/nearabouts) or British Columbia. Does anyone else remember this thread?

  3. #63
    Armorer Array DHCJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Long Beach, CA / Las Vegas
    Posts
    4,428
    Quote Originally Posted by oiuyt View Post
    The rules require 15cm of insulation. We allow less than that under the theory that it can't possibly provide an advantage (and generally actually represents a disadvantage) to the fencer with such a foil. Where in the rules does it specify that the 15-18th cm of the blade may not be insulated? Point that out and I'll retract my statement regarding the legality of 18cm of tape and that the armorers (mostly, some referees as well) erronenously like to cite this as an example of a problematical rule (and I wouldn't be terribly surprised if there were such a rule, I'm merely unaware of it).
    -B
    Your point about of is good.

    I was just pointing out you had made a typo and reversed the standard thinking on M.13. As far as where it says you can’t have tape over 15 cm, M.13. If you come up with tape over 15 cm, all I have to do is point to M.13 and you can’t complain. If you come up with tape less than 15 cm and I let it pass are you going to complain? Let me give another example. Suppose you come up with a lame’ with 7 ohms resistance over an area about the size of a silver dollar and I let it pass are you going to complain? Suppose the next person in line throws their bag on the table knocking over my meters and starts cussing me out for taking so long and they have an area the size of a quarter that has 6 ohms resistance. Am I required to pass it?

    The FIE appears to prefer rules that give them flexibility. Take for example, M.27 do you know of any Foil mask that would pass? How about the new M.25. Does that mean if one fencer is wearing Addidas and one Allstar they would fail? Suppose that one fencer’s mom wanted to sponsor their child and got a patch that was legal according to the publicity code could they wear it if the other fencers in the team didn’t have one. I know this could not happen to you since Sabreist are not allowed to have logos on their arms. I have noticed a number of Sabre lame’ with the club logo on the arm, which is illegal. If I am lenient will they complain?
    Donald Hollis Clinton, Jr.
    DHCJr@juno.com

    To Teach is to Learn (Japanese Proverb)

    Knowing the rule book by heart means nothing, if you don't understand the rules.

  4. #64
    Senior Member Array Philistine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by KD5MDK View Post
    I have the notion that the thread felt the touch stood, but I can't find the thread and it's driving me nuts. It happened in either Washington (Seattle/nearabouts) or British Columbia. Does anyone else remember this thread?
    Thread

    --Philistine

  5. #65
    Fencing Expert Array oiuyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Pennsauken, NJ
    Posts
    11,887
    It wasn't a typo, and I was very aware that I had reversed the common order.

    The rule specifies that the barrel and top 15cm of blade must be fully insulated. A foil with 18cm of tape complies with that rule. I admit the possibility that there's ANOTHER rule which prohibits the insulation in the 15-18cm range, but I am unaware of it. Absent such a prohibition, 18cm of tape should be legal. Certainly m.13 doesn't prohibit it. It doesn't specify a maximum of 15cm or exactly 15cm, it merely says that 15cm must be insulated.

    (for reference, and so other people don't need to go dig up exact language)
    Quote Originally Posted by USFA Rulebook
    (h) The insulation of the barrel, the blade and the grip
    m.13
    The body of the barrel and the foil blade for a length of 15 cm from the barrel, as well as the pommel or the rear extremity of the handle, must be entirely covered with insulating material (insulating tape, gummed paper, Sellotape, plastic material or varnish).
    The flange of the sleeve which slides in the base of the point and within which is fixed the pointe d’arręt must be of a smaller diameter than the insulated head of the pointe d’arręt itself, to obviate an accidental contact being made with the conductive jacket when a touch is made.
    -B
    "Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"

  6. #66
    Armorer Array DHCJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Long Beach, CA / Las Vegas
    Posts
    4,428
    A good point. It is not just this rule that I would love to see cleaned up.
    Donald Hollis Clinton, Jr.
    DHCJr@juno.com

    To Teach is to Learn (Japanese Proverb)

    Knowing the rule book by heart means nothing, if you don't understand the rules.

  7. #67
    arc
    arc is offline
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    266

    Christe eleison ...

    Having just read through this whole thread, I realize first, that lawyers have got nothing on fencers, and that second, as a lawyer, I now see why I don't spend more time on the forums ...

  8. #68
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    34,471
    Objection. Counsel is testifying. Call for a mistrial.
    Use the Shift key, people! Keyboard manufacturers everywhere are ineffably saddened when you ignore what they made just for you!

  9. #69
    Senior Member Array jBirch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Carstairs, AB, Canada
    Posts
    3,467
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata View Post
    Objection. Counsel is testifying. Call for a mistrial.
    Actually, shouldn't that simply be a call for the testimonial to be stricken from the record and not considered as evidence?

    If you appeal a touch, that doesn't mean you're entitled to re-fight the entire bout.

    James.
    Last edited by jBirch; 02-13-2007 at 06:06 PM. Reason: Hooped up the tense.
    If it's stupid, but it works, it's not stupid.

  10. #70
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    34,471
    Always ask for the highest possible reward and negotiate down.
    Use the Shift key, people! Keyboard manufacturers everywhere are ineffably saddened when you ignore what they made just for you!

  11. #71
    Senior Member Array jBirch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Carstairs, AB, Canada
    Posts
    3,467
    "Law: the art of truth through persuasion"

    James.
    If it's stupid, but it works, it's not stupid.

  12. #72
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    34,471
    Once Law was sitting on the bench,
    And Mercy knelt a-weeping.
    "Clear out!" he cried, "disordered wench!
    Nor come before me creeping.
    Upon your knees if you appear,
    'Tis plain your have no standing here."

    Then Justice came. His Honor cried:
    "Your status? — devil seize you!"
    "Amica curiae," she replied —
    "Friend of the court, so please you."
    "Begone!" he shouted — "there's the door —
    I never saw your face before!"
    Use the Shift key, people! Keyboard manufacturers everywhere are ineffably saddened when you ignore what they made just for you!

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. Off-strip; Halt; physical-touch; touch counts
    By luv2fence in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-16-2005, 11:56 PM
  2. Question for rules
    By Trim Plus Expert in forum Rec Sport Fencing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-21-2005, 02:28 PM
  3. Re: New Rules / question
    By Peter Buchas in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-10-2003, 09:32 AM
  4. Re: New Rules / question
    By Peter Buchas in forum Rec Sport Fencing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-08-2003, 10:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30