Restrict Cadet and Junior NACs to "E" and Above Only - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > General Fencing > Fencing Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-20-2006, 06:56 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 284
Soberin has a reputation beyond reputeSoberin has a reputation beyond reputeSoberin has a reputation beyond reputeSoberin has a reputation beyond reputeSoberin has a reputation beyond reputeSoberin has a reputation beyond reputeSoberin has a reputation beyond reputeSoberin has a reputation beyond reputeSoberin has a reputation beyond reputeSoberin has a reputation beyond reputeSoberin has a reputation beyond repute
Restrict Cadet and Junior NACs to "E" and Above Only

Why not make Cadet and Junior fencers have at least an "E" before being allowed to enter their NACs? This wouldn't be fair to the Y10 through Y14 groups, but by the time a fencer is a Cadet, some minimal proficiency should be demonstrated before direct access into a national level event. I am sure even in the most fencing-deprived areas of the country, there are enough open events, or minimum C1 (for age-resricted Cadet events only) for an "E" to be earned. There are ideas being put forth for ways to control size and quality of NACs, so let's be prepared. I am not talking about JOs yet--let the "U"s fence in the qualies and see what happens. Of course they can also fence Div2/3 anyway, as most already are.
Soberin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 06-20-2006, 07:07 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
telkanuru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 4,268
telkanuru has a reputation beyond reputetelkanuru has a reputation beyond reputetelkanuru has a reputation beyond reputetelkanuru has a reputation beyond reputetelkanuru has a reputation beyond reputetelkanuru has a reputation beyond reputetelkanuru has a reputation beyond reputetelkanuru has a reputation beyond reputetelkanuru has a reputation beyond reputetelkanuru has a reputation beyond reputetelkanuru has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to telkanuru
Because it wouldn't actually DO anything...

It's like trying to cut Cs out of Div I to reduce numbers, when there are 120 As in the competition. Pointless.
__________________
Get the hell off my internet.
telkanuru is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 07:20 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
D+F+P=Hadouken!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,466
D+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond repute
If the USFA wanted to take this route, they would cut out C and under.

The problem arises when you take out those fencers, you cut down on the revenue generated from these events. The USFA already loses money on NAC's because of a few things...
  • Shipment of equipment to the venue.
  • Employee travel expenses.
  • Venue day rates.

The USFA relies on summer nationals to recoup the losses from NAC's. Cutting out customers would increase the amount we need to recoup, so you would either have to suck it up, or add another event to nationals.
__________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. And from this side only! The flight of a half-man, half-bird. Dinosaurs nuzzling their young in pastures where strip malls should be. Cookies on dowels. All those moment, lost in time. Gone, like eggs off a hooker's stomach. Time to die" -Phil Ken Sebben
D+F+P=Hadouken! is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 07:48 PM   #4
Have Blazer, Will Travel
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,751
KD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to KD5MDK
Age appropriate competition, and seperate gendered competition, are not available in many areas. Removing one of the avenues it is currently available doesn't strike me as a big improvement. NAC B is the one that's the biggest problem, I think, and I really can't speak to a good solution there without knowing more about what the entry breakdown is.
KD5MDK is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 08:02 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 36
Your Bane will become famous soon enough
Why not bridge the revenue gap by charging vets quadruple fees? After all, they are most likely financially stable, credit worthy and willing to win one for the Gipper, eh?
Your Bane is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 08:12 PM   #6
Scavenger
 
Peach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 4,518
Peach has a reputation beyond reputePeach has a reputation beyond reputePeach has a reputation beyond reputePeach has a reputation beyond reputePeach has a reputation beyond reputePeach has a reputation beyond reputePeach has a reputation beyond reputePeach has a reputation beyond reputePeach has a reputation beyond reputePeach has a reputation beyond reputePeach has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Your Bane
Why not bridge the revenue gap by charging vets quadruple fees? After all, they are most likely financially stable, credit worthy and willing to win one for the Gipper, eh?
Meh. We also have enough smarts and experience to start our own organization if need be.
__________________

I never made a mistake in grammar but one in my life and as soon as I done it I seen it. -- Carl Sandburg
Peach is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 08:27 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
D+F+P=Hadouken!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,466
D+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond reputeD+F+P=Hadouken! has a reputation beyond repute
I would actually propose limiting youth NAC's to C and under, and then adding Open Sabre, Open Epee and Open Foil to summer nats. Make it a quick and intense event, 40% promotion out of pools, no repechage, 7 point DE's instead of 15.
__________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. And from this side only! The flight of a half-man, half-bird. Dinosaurs nuzzling their young in pastures where strip malls should be. Cookies on dowels. All those moment, lost in time. Gone, like eggs off a hooker's stomach. Time to die" -Phil Ken Sebben
D+F+P=Hadouken! is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2006, 12:10 AM   #8
JEC
Senior Member
 
JEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,829
JEC has a reputation beyond reputeJEC has a reputation beyond reputeJEC has a reputation beyond reputeJEC has a reputation beyond reputeJEC has a reputation beyond reputeJEC has a reputation beyond reputeJEC has a reputation beyond reputeJEC has a reputation beyond reputeJEC has a reputation beyond reputeJEC has a reputation beyond reputeJEC has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by D+F+P=Hadouken!
I would actually propose limiting youth NAC's to C and under, and then adding Open Sabre, Open Epee and Open Foil to summer nats. Make it a quick and intense event, 40% promotion out of pools, no repechage, 7 point DE's instead of 15.
Many of the Y10-12 fencers earn their rating at NACs because age-limited tournaments elsewhere DO NOT earn ratings unless C1 or above. That's the ladder.
__________________
Epee is the Sword.
JEC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2006, 12:32 AM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 46
MattyCam
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soberin
Why not make Cadet and Junior fencers have at least an "E" before being allowed to enter their NACs? This wouldn't be fair to the Y10 through Y14 groups, but by the time a fencer is a Cadet, some minimal proficiency should be demonstrated before direct access into a national level event. I am sure even in the most fencing-deprived areas of the country, there are enough open events, or minimum C1 (for age-resricted Cadet events only) for an "E" to be earned. There are ideas being put forth for ways to control size and quality of NACs, so let's be prepared. I am not talking about JOs yet--let the "U"s fence in the qualies and see what happens. Of course they can also fence Div2/3 anyway, as most already are.

The USFA makes too much money in fees to do anything like that. They will have the space and plenty of mediocre refs to bang out a tournament. Come on guys, it's the USFA?!

Besides, experience rules and get it while you can. We've all been Us and all have stories about top fencers we had a chance to fence and learn from at the national level tournaments. Fencing in the big rooms makes a huge difference for the young fencers out there. Seems like a win/win to me.

matt

Last edited by MattyCam; 06-21-2006 at 12:44 AM.
MattyCam is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2006, 10:20 AM   #10
rac
Sr. Spirits Inspector
 
rac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,903
rac has a reputation beyond reputerac has a reputation beyond reputerac has a reputation beyond reputerac has a reputation beyond reputerac has a reputation beyond reputerac has a reputation beyond reputerac has a reputation beyond reputerac has a reputation beyond reputerac has a reputation beyond reputerac has a reputation beyond reputerac has a reputation beyond repute
What would you do about non-US fencers?
__________________
"Everybody’s got to believe in something. I believe I'll have another beer." — W.C. Fields

"So just read an article on the dangers of heavy drinking....
Scared the crap out of me.
So that's it!
After today, no more reading."


"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati (When all else fails play dead)" — Possom Lodge Motto
rac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2006, 01:12 PM   #11
eac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 705
eac has a reputation beyond reputeeac has a reputation beyond reputeeac has a reputation beyond reputeeac has a reputation beyond reputeeac has a reputation beyond reputeeac has a reputation beyond reputeeac has a reputation beyond reputeeac has a reputation beyond reputeeac has a reputation beyond reputeeac has a reputation beyond reputeeac has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by rac
What would you do about non-US fencers?
The same thing that they do at Div I NACs. There are lots of Canadians and the occasional Thai or Israeli there, and I haven't noticed any extreme scrubs, so they must be doing it basically right. I don't know what that is, though.

Note also that I don't think U16/U19 should be restricted to E-and-under. The U's only take up space during the pools, and not very much of it, and they aren't very difficult to ref, and they pay lots of entry fees to fund fun things like NACs and international athletes.
eac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jose Padilla - "Pa dee ya" or "pa dill a" Rogue Politics 3 01-15-2006 10:01 PM
BF "white" and BF "blue" FIE foil blades millsisland Armory - Q&A 8 09-27-2005 12:25 AM
ER "Secrets and Lies" (S8, E16) features "roughhouse" fencing esskreemr Fencing Discussion 2 12-06-2004 07:42 PM
Teaching "proper" form when it isn't "natural" Tomas N Fencing Discussion 27 10-07-2004 02:33 AM
[CFML] Re: expression: "et la" or perhaps "he la" stuydaze Classical Fencing Mailing List 0 01-23-2004 07:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 AM.


(c) 1995 - 2007 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 -    Medieval Swords from the online Replica Sword Shop