05-29-2006, 01:42 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Georgia
Posts: 360
| Questions About Epee Grip I was reading the USFA rules, and I saw in m.4.3 said "...However, at épée, orthopaedic grips, whether metal or not,may not be covered with leather or any material whichcould hide wires or switches."
doesnt this mean taping a epee ortho grip would be illegal? I personally use a belgian grip and it's heavily(so heavy that it's about 3/16 inch thick) taped at the place where the little finger is position.
I have never encountered any problems regarding this taping since in all the local tournaments I went to, no one checks the grip. But I am going to Georgia Game(which will be more formal and stricter, I assume?), so I am concerned about this.
Anyone has any idea and/or experience about this?
Another question is, in epee and epee only, do you guys prefer a slightly bigger grip or a slightly smaller grip than the perfect size you want it to be? For example, my size sits between the large and the median visc. grip, but I like large better.
Last edited by BySword; 05-29-2006 at 01:50 PM.
|
| | | And now for this message... | |
05-29-2006, 01:47 PM
|
#2 | | Épéeist Hive Queen
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Sweden
Posts: 12,759
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by BySword doesnt this mean taping a epee ortho grip would be illegal? | Assuming the USFA rules are like the FIE rules, then yes (strictly speaking). But I've seen people using tape so I suppose it would depend on the level of competition you were entering, and how rigurous they would follow the rules.
__________________ Fencing is my only PvP. |
| |
05-29-2006, 02:49 PM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Pacoima, ca USA
Posts: 5,992
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by BySword I was reading the USFA rules, and I saw in m.4.3 said "...However, at épée, orthopaedic grips, whether metal or not,may not be covered with leather or any material whichcould hide wires or switches."
doesnt this mean taping a epee ortho grip would be illegal? I personally use a belgian grip and it's heavily(so heavy that it's about 3/16 inch thick) taped at the place where the little finger is position. | You have it correct...taping an ortho grip on an epee is illegal...of course, you can just as easily hide a switch on a French, but the tape rule doesn't apply to the French.
Best to remove the tape and get used to the feel before you go. And if you have tape holding your wires down inside the guard, it's illegal unless the tape is clear (because opaque or gaff tape could hide a switch, while clear tape would allow the director to see the wires.) |
| |
05-29-2006, 04:32 PM
|
#4 | | Armorer
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Long Beach, CA / Las Vegas
Posts: 3,514
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Purple Fencer You have it correct...taping an ortho grip on an epee is illegal...of course, you can just as easily hide a switch on a French, but the tape rule doesn't apply to the French. | People don't understand why the tape is band with an Orthopedic grip and not a French. It is simple, yes you could hide a switch on a French, but could you reliably use it. On a Orthopedic, you could put the switch on the bottom part of the prong, since the handle fixes the position of the hand, you will always know where the switch is in relation to your hand.
Since with a French your hand can move, the switch may be anywhere in relation to your hand, you might even set it off accidently. There is a logical explanation for their reason for this rule.
__________________
Donald Hollis Clinton, Jr. DHCJr@juno.com
To Teach is to Learn (Japanese Proverb)
Knowing the rule book by heart means nothing, if you don't understand the rules.
|
| |
05-29-2006, 05:24 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,238
| Hmm... I'd like to think that if I put a switch under some tape on a french grip, I could find it awfully fast, and I've never even trained to find it. Which I would if I had a switch under there I needed to get to.
I think the more likely reasoning behind the rule is that a lot of fench grips come wrapped in something (leather for instance) and it would be harder to police given that. And the leather wrapped french grip is awfully traditional, so it's hard to ban it.
__________________
^^
|
| |
05-29-2006, 05:55 PM
|
#6 | | Armorer
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Long Beach, CA / Las Vegas
Posts: 3,514
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by keropie Hmm... I'd like to think that if I put a switch under some tape on a french grip, I could find it awfully fast, and I've never even trained to find it. Which I would if I had a switch under there I needed to get to.
I think the more likely reasoning behind the rule is that a lot of fench grips come wrapped in something (leather for instance) and it would be harder to police given that. And the leather wrapped french grip is awfully traditional, so it's hard to ban it. | Yes you could, but maybe too fast. You pick up your weapon and the light goes off. It wouldn't be harder to police it, those handles would be illegal, if you included French in the ban. There is no word tape in the rules (M.4.3), while there is rule on leather. The rules says you can not have leather or anything else that would hide a switch. So if French were included, there would be no problem enforcing the rule. There are a lot of orthopedic handle that have a plastic or some other coating for Foil. They are banned for Epee. You might work on your logic.
__________________
Donald Hollis Clinton, Jr. DHCJr@juno.com
To Teach is to Learn (Japanese Proverb)
Knowing the rule book by heart means nothing, if you don't understand the rules.
|
| |
05-29-2006, 07:02 PM
|
#7 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,177
| When I see a french grip with tape on it, I usually give it a squeeze to see if anything funny happens while I'm inspecting the weapon. |
| |
05-29-2006, 07:16 PM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Georgia
Posts: 360
| it says leather and anything else that can hide a switch?
if we enforce this on french grip, that just meant we will have to all switch to rubber french grip. |
| |
05-29-2006, 07:40 PM
|
#9 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,177
| No, because rubber could hide a switch too. It would mean we'd have to move to all metal, wood (or bone?) grips, I'd think. However, the rule specifically does not apply to french grips. |
| |
05-29-2006, 08:01 PM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,238
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by DHCJr You might work on your logic. | And perhaps you need to chill. If YOU can't avoid hitting a particular part of your grip when YOU fence, then it is perhaps a good thing YOU are an armorer. I am not a particularly adept french grip fencer, and yet I have no doubts that I could avoid a place where I'd put a switch, and even fewer doubts that someone who actually uses the grip to fence could do better.
Expecting consistency out of the rules for fencing is purely foolish. The rulebook has about the same consistency as plum pudding (or the bible, if you prefer). There is no reason that a competitive international fencer who uses a french grip couldn't hide a button under tape and use it. If your logic for the difference in rules re: grips is based on that premise, your logic may be sound, but the basis if flawed.
Additionally, if you want to be the guy that jumps on people for 'poor logic' in posts, I'd suggest learning/applying the rules of grammar and spelling to yours. For instance, 'tape is banned on Orthopedic', questions ('could you reliably use it') end in question marks, and pronouns ('for their reason') have antecedents within the sentence in which they are used.
I do feel, by the way, that the reason that this rule does not apply to French grips is that they would have to be a single solid piece to the core to not have something that could hide a switch (leather, rubber, separate piece of plastic, etc.), and not some idea that a switch would be 'hard to use' on a French grip.
__________________
^^
Last edited by keropie; 05-30-2006 at 12:13 AM.
|
| |
05-29-2006, 09:18 PM
|
#11 | | Boom!
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Canada
Posts: 5,925
| Anyone around here ever painted their grips after mixing some painters' sand into the paint? I've been looking for more friction on the grip and have been told that that's one way to go about it...
__________________ Pound for pound, the amoeba is the most vicious animal on earth. |
| |
05-29-2006, 09:49 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Georgia
Posts: 360
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by ThatReallyHurt Anyone around here ever painted their grips after mixing some painters' sand into the paint? I've been looking for more friction on the grip and have been told that that's one way to go about it... | never try this. I score the place on my grip where my fingers place |
| |
05-29-2006, 10:30 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 4,875
| Does anyone else think the sentance is being read incorrectly?
"...However, at épée, orthopaedic grips, whether metal or not,may not be covered with leather or any material which could hide wires or switches."
To me, it seems to be banning any tape or materiel that would be able to hide a switch apparatus, not a generic ban on tape. I mean, you could hide a switch under a back prong, but without wires going to it which were not hidden, it would be rather useless. It seems to me that if the tape dosn't go all the way down to the guard it should be fine... |
| |
05-30-2006, 01:26 AM
|
#14 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,177
| Unless some clever person drilled holes in the grip to run their wires to the switch. |
| |
05-30-2006, 01:01 PM
|
#15 | | Armorer
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Long Beach, CA / Las Vegas
Posts: 3,514
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by keropie And perhaps you need to chill. If YOU can't avoid hitting a particular part of your grip when YOU fence, then it is perhaps a good thing YOU are an armorer. I am not a particularly adept french grip fencer, and yet I have no doubts that I could avoid a place where I'd put a switch, and even fewer doubts that someone who actually uses the grip to fence could do better.
Expecting consistency out of the rules for fencing is purely foolish. The rulebook has about the same consistency as plum pudding (or the bible, if you prefer). There is no reason that a competitive international fencer who uses a french grip couldn't hide a button under tape and use it. If your logic for the difference in rules re: grips is based on that premise, your logic may be sound, but the basis if flawed.
Additionally, if you want to be the guy that jumps on people for 'poor logic' in posts, I'd suggest learning/applying the rules of grammar and spelling to yours. For instance, 'tape is banned on Orthopedic', questions ('could you reliably use it') end in question marks, and pronouns ('for their reason') have antecedents within the sentence in which they are used.
I do feel, by the way, that the reason that this rule does not apply to French grips is that they would have to be a single solid piece to the core to not have something that could hide a switch (leather, rubber, separate piece of plastic, etc.), and not some idea that a switch would be 'hard to use' on a French grip. | You're right, my spelling is atrocious. They do make solid French handles. Maybe to be more logical, the FIE should extend the ban to French handles.
__________________
Donald Hollis Clinton, Jr. DHCJr@juno.com
To Teach is to Learn (Japanese Proverb)
Knowing the rule book by heart means nothing, if you don't understand the rules.
|
| |
05-30-2006, 02:32 PM
|
#16 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 4,875
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by KD5MDK Unless some clever person drilled holes in the grip to run their wires to the switch. | I think you are severely underestimating the possiblility of someone undertaking such an endevour while making it remain undetectable. Plus, a ref/armourer can always ask you to remove the tape to verify... |
| |
05-30-2006, 03:09 PM
|
#17 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,177
| I presume you mean overestimating? |
| |
05-30-2006, 03:17 PM
|
#18 | | Armorer
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Long Beach, CA / Las Vegas
Posts: 3,514
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by telkanuru I think you are severely underestimating the possiblility of someone undertaking such an endevour while making it remain undetectable. Plus, a ref/armourer can always ask you to remove the tape to verify... | From some of the taping of handles I have seen, it would take longer to remove the tape, verify there is no switch and put the tape back on, then an bout would last and we are talking Epee.
It is easier to just say no covering.
__________________
Donald Hollis Clinton, Jr. DHCJr@juno.com
To Teach is to Learn (Japanese Proverb)
Knowing the rule book by heart means nothing, if you don't understand the rules.
|
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM. |