American Fencing League - Comments, questions, observations? - Page 3 - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > General Fencing > Fencing Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-17-2006, 05:12 PM   #41
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 9,089
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
Quote:
Originally Posted by chefencer
Well, national governing bodies don't always act logically, and might be subject to some political pressures that warp the end results *clears throat*...
It is sometimes up to the local groups to do what makes the most sense within the established protocols.
But people are allowed to fence up, no? So you could run your events as "junior" events (apparently this is the highest current category).

I suppose that would then quickly inflate your local ratings as people gain junior status when they "should" only have novice.

Seems poorly thought out. The classifications of the competition are handed out based on what the competition is called rather than the level of the actual field. And unless there are at least SOME junior or higher local events you've pretty much barred higher-level sport fencers, other than by violating your own rules.

I think I'd lobby for changes and meanwhile hold junior events and not worry about the ratings inflation. But your solution works too (until someone decides to complain about the fact that the same technically in ineligible fencer keeps winning all of their events).

-B
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 05-17-2006, 05:46 PM   #42
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 9,089
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
Looking through the rules... some interesting variations from the USFA/FIE penalty chart.

"Favoring an opponent" is Group III, "Profiting from collusion" is Group IV.

So if I pre-arrange to throw a DE bout to you I get a red card, you get a black card. Now I'VE profitted from the situation and should be black carded, while you clearly have gained no profit and therefore should only be penalized for collusion. And then we flip back and forth indefinitely. :)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AFL Rulebook
156. The time limit for official contests shall be the following:

<SNIP>

(c) Sabre ................................ Five minutes
*snigger*

-B
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[FRED] Calgary Fencing League #3 Web Bot Tournaments and Camps 0 01-20-2006 03:18 AM
[FRED] Calgary Fencing League #3 Web Bot Tournaments and Camps 0 01-15-2006 02:21 AM
Observations by a former Olympic Champion on Saber, Roch, and Fencing gladius Fencing Discussion 18 11-01-2005 04:44 AM
Article: Real Life Observations from a Fencing Mom Craig Fencing Discussion 24 01-10-2004 12:51 AM
Professional Fencing League alessandro Discussion Archive 12 02-02-2002 07:18 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05 AM.


(c) 1995 - 2007 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 -    Medieval Swords from the online Replica Sword Shop