05-10-2006, 02:33 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,563
| Pointless Observations: Southeast Sectionals Point Totals Point Totals from 2006 Southeast sectionals, 40% rounded up using Div 1 domestic points table.
Georgia-29159
Virginia-16239
Alabama-15466
North Carolina-13539
Tennessee-12172
Gold Coast Florida-8639
Gateway Florida-7884
Central Florida-2925
South Carolina- 2250
Pointless Observation: It is much better to be in North Carolina then South Carolina.....
__________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. And from this side only! The flight of a half-man, half-bird. Dinosaurs nuzzling their young in pastures where strip malls should be. Cookies on dowels. All those moment, lost in time. Gone, like eggs off a hooker's stomach. Time to die" -Phil Ken Sebben
|
| | | And now for this message... | |
05-10-2006, 02:54 PM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 1,207
| How are points determined and do they do it the same way everywhere? I figure I might as well give this pointless post a point! 
__________________
Fail until you succeed!
Ka-riposte back atcha Purple!
Disgruntled Employee of the Month.
|
| |
05-10-2006, 04:01 PM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Charlotte, NC area
Posts: 2,501
| They do not do points the same way everywhere. National points are what DFP used, and other sections/areas/clubs have their own methods. |
| |
05-10-2006, 04:12 PM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 559
| Data lacks value without framing by other variables.
For example, it might just be that certain divisions during this particular time period have a larger pool of fencers to collect points, or that other areas saw a larger number of inconvenient illnesses affecting fencers during competition days, or that socio-economic factors prevalent to a region afford those athletes opportunities to fence more often and attend more events, or any number of other funky factors that can only be imagined. |
| |
05-10-2006, 06:01 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,519
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Redblade For example, it might just be that certain divisions during this particular time period have a larger pool of fencers to collect points, or that other areas saw a larger number of inconvenient illnesses affecting fencers during competition days, or that socio-economic factors prevalent to a region afford those athletes opportunities to fence more often and attend more events, or any number of other funky factors that can only be imagined. | I disagree, about the first part at least. I'd rather be in an area with 5 good fencers rather than 1 good fencer, therefore, adjusting for that is not necessary. The other factors are pretty random and would probably cancel out if more data was taken. |
| |
05-10-2006, 06:17 PM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,325
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by mrbiggs I disagree, about the first part at least. I'd rather be in an area with 5 good fencers rather than 1 good fencer, therefore, adjusting for that is not necessary. The other factors are pretty random and would probably cancel out if more data was taken. | Basically you're correct except that you are making the assumption that all fencers choose to fence.
If area A has 5 top quality fencers on the points list but only one shows up
vs.
Area B which has 5 top quality fencers who are on the points list but all show up b/c sectionals is in their backyard.
Hence why number of fencers matters |
| |
05-10-2006, 06:24 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Jyväskylä
Posts: 3,919
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by mrbiggs I disagree, about the first part at least. I'd rather be in an area with 5 good fencers rather than 1 good fencer, therefore, adjusting for that is not necessary. The other factors are pretty random and would probably cancel out if more data was taken. | Strength factors don't work very well at the Regional level, because the quality of fencing is generally poor across the board.
At the National (much more so at the international level), the level of the fencers in the 32 are only slightly below the level of those in the finals.
However, at a regional event the difference is vast.
__________________ Quit touchin' me, ya freak
F.Net Rule #1: E. L. E. (everybody love everybody) |
| |
05-10-2006, 09:07 PM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004 Location: UNC
Posts: 312
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by D+F+P=Hadouken! Pointless Observation: It is much better to be in North Carolina then South Carolina..... | um, anyone could have told you that and not even glanced at points...
__________________
"I have an excellent idea! Let's change the subject." March Hare
|
| |
05-10-2006, 09:13 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,519
| I understand now. The first time I read through, I thought he was talking about the division 1 points list. Never mind. |
| |
05-10-2006, 09:58 PM
|
#10 | | gother than thou
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 861
| What is North Carolina offering me that South Carolina is not?  |
| |
05-10-2006, 10:24 PM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NC,SC, TN
Posts: 177
| nc vs sc two ncaa fencing programs.
__________________
"who do you think you are?"
"Do you think by making someone a knight, you make them a better fighter?"
"Yes"
|
| |
05-10-2006, 10:35 PM
|
#12 | | gother than thou
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 861
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Padawan two ncaa fencing programs. | This offers *me* nothing :P |
| |
05-10-2006, 10:43 PM
|
#13 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,235
| As a matter of fact, DFP's Observation, far from being pointless, contains 108273 of them. |
| |
05-11-2006, 01:53 AM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: I have no home
Posts: 2,007
| I mean I could think of several things Tool, do you need a list?
1) Better looking women at a much higher incidence. 65-45 not bad at all. All things considered it would even leave Tony the Tiger speechless.
2) Higher concentrations of nationally competitive fencers and coaches.
3) Colors that aren't rather gaudy shades of purple and orange 
__________________ I now dangle to the left....my tassle. Get your minds out of the gutter.
"Martin was not an optimist; he was a prisoner of hope." Optimism is about assuming there's evidence that justifies your outlook while hope is about creating the evidence and procuring your own happiness or vision of the world. - Professor West
|
| |
05-11-2006, 04:36 AM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,252
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by TooLoftheDeviL This offers *me* nothing :P | Sure it does, it offers you a higher concentration of fencers who have competitive NCAA experience, which (in most areas) does tend to raise the level  |
| |
05-11-2006, 10:33 AM
|
#16 | | Admin
Join Date: Dec 1999 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,694
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by TooLoftheDeviL What is North Carolina offering me that South Carolina is not?  | Franklin Street
Top of the Hill
The Rat
2am chicken biscuits at Time Out
and of course - the quad in the spring
Oh, and there are a number of fencers there too  |
| |
05-14-2006, 04:08 PM
|
#17 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004 Location: UNC
Posts: 312
| mmmm time out. sweet tea. oh chapel hill, how i miss you in the summer.
__________________
"I have an excellent idea! Let's change the subject." March Hare
|
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 AM. |