-
Senior Member
Array Wolf boy or bigfoot? It's a huge question for the scientific and monkey loving world, is bigfoot man or ape?, some theories are suggesting the big hairy fella is just a wolf boy
it has been proven by one amature scientist what do you guys think? -
Member
Array though i do believe in evolution i dont believe a missing link still exist. Could have just been some freakishly deformed ape.... "live in your world, Die in mine." -
Moderator
Array  Originally Posted by Captain Hook It's a huge question for the scientific and monkey loving world, is bigfoot man or ape?, some theories are suggesting the big hairy fella is just a wolf boy
it has been proven by one amature scientist what do you guys think?  So you believe the cryptozooligsts?
It's is extremely unlikely, doubly so for places like the US, that a 'bigfoot' of any description exists.
There are no little green men sticking objects up peoples bottoms either.
Last edited by Gav; 04-26-2006 at 12:46 PM.
-
Senior Member
Array I think you should check with the experts at the Weekly World News! http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/ Fail until you succeed!
Ka-riposte back atcha Purple!
Disgruntled Employee of the Month. -
Moderator
Array Who?
Quick browse later ...
So that's what they call science? -
 Originally Posted by Gav There are no little green men sticking objects up peoples bottoms either. Of course not they are more of a blue/grey colour. Wanting to escape from the lab. -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by Gav It's is extremely unlikely, doubly so for places like the US, that a 'bigfoot' of any description exists. I don't know why 'doubly so' for the US...here in the NW corner, we have huge tracts of heavily forested virtually uninhabited mountains extending into British Columbia that could hide all sorts of fascinating creatures. I don't know if Bigfoot exists, but it makes the world more interesting just to have the possibility.
If it exists, I would guess Bigfoot is a descendent of the fossil Gigantopithecus, which would make it an apelike form rather than human. Fossils of Gigantopithecus have so far been found only in Asia, but that doesn't mean much in terms of their general distribution. And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?
~Hamlet -
Moderator
Array It'd be nice. And you'd get a big fat "F- me I never expected that!" if I turned out to be wrong. The chances are remote. Less than remote in fact.
Fact is that, like Nessie, the Yeti (Bigfoot's cousin) and the abominable snowman (Bigfoot's 2nd cousin) are simple folk tales. We like to take money off tourists so it's nice to have something to tell them when they drop in to pick up a nice man-skirt.
Now Hobbits .... they do exist. I saw this programme on telly (no not LOTR - a documentary) where this guy went to some remote island looking for a "rare dwarf human species" and didn't find any. What he did find was a tribe of ultra tiny people. Actually it was just the males - who were mostly in the region of 4' - curiously the women were normal sized. Apparently there's not many left and they swore blind that the 'really small people' did exist ... somewhere in the jungle. They even said (via interpreters) that it was really strange that, "these white guys are so tall."
Personally I think that's more interesting, wierd, and downright intriguing than monster stories.
I'm trying to find a link to the programme - but unfortunately I can't. The presenter even looked like a pirate - he was wearing an eyepatch (I'm not kidding or making this up).
The programme was called somthing like "In search of Dragons, Unicorns and Hobbits".
And i'm not talking about these guys either.
Last edited by Gav; 04-26-2006 at 05:59 PM.
-
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by Gav That's a good point, Gav. I would have said the chances of finding something like Homo floresiensis was pretty far-fetched, too. But there they are, in Indonesia. Much more tangible than a folk-tale.
I don't 'believe' in Bigfoot but, even though skeptical, I wouldn't reject its existence out of hand. You could say I'm agnostic on the subject. And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?
~Hamlet -
Senior Member
Array I'd be very interested in knowing why they've classified this new discovery (Homo floresiensis) in the genus Homo. Yes, it's a hominid, and yes, it's fairly late as these things go, but I don't--from the cursory evidence presented--see how this find differs significantly from Australopithicus afarensis, known more familiarly as "Lucy". Lucy was also fully bipedal but only had a brain the size of a softball and stood approximately 4 ft. tall. (Granted she's about 2 million years old rather than 13,000, but that shouldn't matter to the taxonomy.)
I'll have to do some more research. How exciting!
Oh, and you know you're a redneck if you wake up in the next county one morning and can't remember how many aliens it took to get you there.
As for 'bigfoot'--I'll believe it when I see some physical evidence. Nothing is more frightening than ignorance in action. -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by lochinvar I'd be very interested in knowing why they've classified this new discovery (Homo floresiensis) in the genus Homo. Probably because of evidence of complex tool manufacture and use, hunting, and the use of fire for cooking. I haven't seen any figures, but I would guess the brain weight:body weight ratio is higher than for A. afarensis. The calvarium appears to be higher and more rounded, and the face is beneath rather than in front of the cranium. (Judging from photos, of course.) There are a number of anatomical traits that would also be considered, but you're right, the time scale should not enter into the taxonomy.
It would be interesting to examine the interior of the cranial vault to see what markings are left from the folding of the brain, and it's the architecture of the brain that makes a difference in intelligence, not absolute size. And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?
~Hamlet -
Posting Hound
Array  Originally Posted by Gav Now Hobbits .... they do exist. I saw this programme on telly (no not LOTR - a documentary) where this guy went to some remote island looking for a "rare dwarf human species" and didn't find any. What he did find was a tribe of ultra tiny people. Actually it was just the males - who were mostly in the region of 4' - curiously the women were normal sized. Apparently there's not many left and they swore blind that the 'really small people' did exist ... somewhere in the jungle. They even said (via interpreters) that it was really strange that, "these white guys are so tall." Bah... I don't have to go to some remote island to see wee little people. I was looking at some old family photos of my grown aunts and uncles. They looked normal until you see the window sill in the background. My mom was 4'-6", and she was the tall one. Beer, it's whats for dinner! ~ a young snowboarding Canadian The meek don't want it! ~ sticker on a rock band's guitar -
Senior Member
Array Personally I think this is a bit of a silly thread since humans are classified as one of the four great apes... -
Senior Member
Array "If I were ever to challenge you to a duel, your best bet would be battle axes in a very dark basement." Misquoted from The Prisoner
"Technical excellence is the antecedant of tactical creativity." - Nat Goodhartz
But those things which belong neither to God nor to Caeser, feeleth free to writeth them off, for yea, they are deductable. -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by Gav So you believe the cryptozooligsts?.
There are no little green men sticking objects up peoples bottoms either.
Hey, wait a minute.....I don't even have a web cam..... Whatever doesn't kill you, is gonna leave a scar...
Looking for a certain Striptease...... Similar Threads -
By Scaramouche in forum Discussion Archive
Replies: 2
Last Post: 03-08-2002, 09:22 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules |