topleft topright

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Senior Member Array Captain Hook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    160

    Wolf boy or bigfoot?

    It's a huge question for the scientific and monkey loving world, is bigfoot man or ape?, some theories are suggesting the big hairy fella is just a wolf boy

    it has been proven by one amature scientist what do you guys think?

  2. #2
    Member Array CountAntonio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Downey California
    Posts
    67
    though i do believe in evolution i dont believe a missing link still exist. Could have just been some freakishly deformed ape....
    "live in your world, Die in mine."

  3. #3
    Gav
    Gav is online now
    Moderator Array Gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    6,559
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Hook
    It's a huge question for the scientific and monkey loving world, is bigfoot man or ape?, some theories are suggesting the big hairy fella is just a wolf boy

    it has been proven by one amature scientist what do you guys think?
    So you believe the cryptozooligsts?

    It's is extremely unlikely, doubly so for places like the US, that a 'bigfoot' of any description exists.

    There are no little green men sticking objects up peoples bottoms either.
    Last edited by Gav; 04-26-2006 at 12:46 PM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array Morion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Tucson, AZ USA
    Posts
    1,219
    I think you should check with the experts at the Weekly World News!

    http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/
    Fail until you succeed!

    Ka-riposte back atcha Purple!

    Disgruntled Employee of the Month.

  5. #5
    Gav
    Gav is online now
    Moderator Array Gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    6,559
    Who?

    Quick browse later ...

    So that's what they call science?

  6. #6
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by Gav
    There are no little green men sticking objects up peoples bottoms either.
    Of course not they are more of a blue/grey colour.
    Wanting to escape from the lab.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array BrianH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    1,489
    Blog Entries
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by Gav
    It's is extremely unlikely, doubly so for places like the US, that a 'bigfoot' of any description exists.
    I don't know why 'doubly so' for the US...here in the NW corner, we have huge tracts of heavily forested virtually uninhabited mountains extending into British Columbia that could hide all sorts of fascinating creatures. I don't know if Bigfoot exists, but it makes the world more interesting just to have the possibility.

    If it exists, I would guess Bigfoot is a descendent of the fossil Gigantopithecus, which would make it an apelike form rather than human. Fossils of Gigantopithecus have so far been found only in Asia, but that doesn't mean much in terms of their general distribution.
    And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?
    ~Hamlet

  8. #8
    Gav
    Gav is online now
    Moderator Array Gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    6,559
    It'd be nice. And you'd get a big fat "F- me I never expected that!" if I turned out to be wrong. The chances are remote. Less than remote in fact.

    Fact is that, like Nessie, the Yeti (Bigfoot's cousin) and the abominable snowman (Bigfoot's 2nd cousin) are simple folk tales. We like to take money off tourists so it's nice to have something to tell them when they drop in to pick up a nice man-skirt.

    Now Hobbits .... they do exist. I saw this programme on telly (no not LOTR - a documentary) where this guy went to some remote island looking for a "rare dwarf human species" and didn't find any. What he did find was a tribe of ultra tiny people. Actually it was just the males - who were mostly in the region of 4' - curiously the women were normal sized. Apparently there's not many left and they swore blind that the 'really small people' did exist ... somewhere in the jungle. They even said (via interpreters) that it was really strange that, "these white guys are so tall."

    Personally I think that's more interesting, wierd, and downright intriguing than monster stories.

    I'm trying to find a link to the programme - but unfortunately I can't. The presenter even looked like a pirate - he was wearing an eyepatch (I'm not kidding or making this up).

    The programme was called somthing like "In search of Dragons, Unicorns and Hobbits".

    And i'm not talking about these guys either.
    Last edited by Gav; 04-26-2006 at 05:59 PM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array BrianH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    1,489
    Blog Entries
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by Gav
    And i'm not talking about these guys either.
    That's a good point, Gav. I would have said the chances of finding something like Homo floresiensis was pretty far-fetched, too. But there they are, in Indonesia. Much more tangible than a folk-tale.

    I don't 'believe' in Bigfoot but, even though skeptical, I wouldn't reject its existence out of hand. You could say I'm agnostic on the subject.
    And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?
    ~Hamlet

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array lochinvar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Grand Rapids, MI, USA
    Posts
    3,001
    I'd be very interested in knowing why they've classified this new discovery (Homo floresiensis) in the genus Homo. Yes, it's a hominid, and yes, it's fairly late as these things go, but I don't--from the cursory evidence presented--see how this find differs significantly from Australopithicus afarensis, known more familiarly as "Lucy". Lucy was also fully bipedal but only had a brain the size of a softball and stood approximately 4 ft. tall. (Granted she's about 2 million years old rather than 13,000, but that shouldn't matter to the taxonomy.)

    I'll have to do some more research. How exciting!

    Oh, and you know you're a redneck if you wake up in the next county one morning and can't remember how many aliens it took to get you there.

    As for 'bigfoot'--I'll believe it when I see some physical evidence.
    Nothing is more frightening than ignorance in action.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Array BrianH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    1,489
    Blog Entries
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by lochinvar
    I'd be very interested in knowing why they've classified this new discovery (Homo floresiensis) in the genus Homo.
    Probably because of evidence of complex tool manufacture and use, hunting, and the use of fire for cooking. I haven't seen any figures, but I would guess the brain weight:body weight ratio is higher than for A. afarensis. The calvarium appears to be higher and more rounded, and the face is beneath rather than in front of the cranium. (Judging from photos, of course.) There are a number of anatomical traits that would also be considered, but you're right, the time scale should not enter into the taxonomy.

    It would be interesting to examine the interior of the cranial vault to see what markings are left from the folding of the brain, and it's the architecture of the brain that makes a difference in intelligence, not absolute size.
    And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?
    ~Hamlet

  12. #12
    Posting Hound Array Fencergrl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cougar Country
    Posts
    10,945
    Blog Entries
    513
    Quote Originally Posted by Gav
    Now Hobbits .... they do exist. I saw this programme on telly (no not LOTR - a documentary) where this guy went to some remote island looking for a "rare dwarf human species" and didn't find any. What he did find was a tribe of ultra tiny people. Actually it was just the males - who were mostly in the region of 4' - curiously the women were normal sized. Apparently there's not many left and they swore blind that the 'really small people' did exist ... somewhere in the jungle. They even said (via interpreters) that it was really strange that, "these white guys are so tall."
    Bah... I don't have to go to some remote island to see wee little people. I was looking at some old family photos of my grown aunts and uncles. They looked normal until you see the window sill in the background. My mom was 4'-6", and she was the tall one.
    Beer, it's whats for dinner! ~ a young snowboarding Canadian
    The meek don't want it! ~ sticker on a rock band's guitar

  13. #13
    Senior Member Array Black Jeebus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Savannah, Ga
    Posts
    6,146
    Personally I think this is a bit of a silly thread since humans are classified as one of the four great apes...
    Hello.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Array RITFencing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wherever I may roam
    Posts
    5,163
    Blog Entries
    32
    What about Manbearpig?
    "If I were ever to challenge you to a duel, your best bet would be battle axes in a very dark basement." Misquoted from The Prisoner

    "Technical excellence is the antecedant of tactical creativity." - Nat Goodhartz

    But those things which belong neither to God nor to Caeser, feeleth free to writeth them off, for yea, they are deductable.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Array latenight's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    The Reflecting God
    Posts
    4,095
    Quote Originally Posted by Gav
    So you believe the cryptozooligsts?.

    There are no little green men sticking objects up peoples bottoms either.

    Hey, wait a minute.....I don't even have a web cam.....
    Whatever doesn't kill you, is gonna leave a scar...

    Looking for a certain Striptease......

Similar Threads

  1. Brotherhood of the Wolf
    By Scaramouche in forum Discussion Archive
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-08-2002, 09:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30