Seeding Team Events - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > General Fencing > Fencing Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2006, 11:16 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Frank Pratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cartersville, GA
Posts: 630
Frank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud of
Seeding Team Events

How are teams seeded at local team events (a local team tournament or the qulaifers to the Team events at the Summer Nationals?) I found a previous thread that explained the seeding criteria for team events at the Summer Nationals, but I can't find anything in the Rules or the Athlete's Handbook about seeding at non-national events (I have an Ops. Manual, but it's the outdated "2000" model.) I assume the seeding is based on the combined ratings of the team members (e.g. a team with 3 “Es” is seeded below a team with 3 “Ds”,) but how does the formula / algorithm work, exactly?
__________________

To be predictable is to be hit often.
Frank Pratt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 03-29-2006, 12:26 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
fencerbill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: near Boston
Posts: 3,300
fencerbill has a reputation beyond reputefencerbill has a reputation beyond reputefencerbill has a reputation beyond reputefencerbill has a reputation beyond reputefencerbill has a reputation beyond reputefencerbill has a reputation beyond reputefencerbill has a reputation beyond reputefencerbill has a reputation beyond reputefencerbill has a reputation beyond reputefencerbill has a reputation beyond reputefencerbill has a reputation beyond repute
Pretty much like throwing darts. Besides, when classifications are equal, those familiar with the fencers will probably know which team they expect to win, they are number one seed.
__________________
It is now after July 4th. My avatar with the Xmas hat is no longer late.

It is now officially early.
fencerbill is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 12:51 AM   #3
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 8,914
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Pratt
but how does the formula / algorithm work, exactly?
Method I've seen used gives 5 points to an A down to 0 points for a U, total up the points for the top three fencers on the team and you have the team's points.

Of course most team events there are few enough teams that a complete round robin is a viable option, at which point seeding isn't important.

Seeding teams off of individual's classifications is even more prone to irregularities and inconsistencies than seeding individuals from classifications.

-B
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 01:10 AM   #4
Fencing Expert
 
downunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Angel, London
Posts: 2,479
downunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond repute
at team events that follow an individual event, teams can be seeded off the team members best 3 results in the individual. EnGarde does this very easily.
downunder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 12:08 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
DJ Apostrophe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Chelmsford, MA
Posts: 1,874
DJ Apostrophe has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Apostrophe has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Apostrophe has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Apostrophe has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Apostrophe has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Apostrophe has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Apostrophe has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Apostrophe has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Apostrophe has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Apostrophe has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Apostrophe has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to DJ Apostrophe Send a message via AIM to DJ Apostrophe
I use my standard fencer code conversion for engarde (http://www.prisedefer.com/Engarde/Rating_Conversion.htm) with the exception that I seed U fencers as 6000, then in the teams table, you use the option "caculate the teams numbers", it adds the three lowest fencer codes on each team, and you've got a fencer code (misnomer) for the team.

This past Sunday (div I / Sr. Team Quals) I did a little tweaking a few times when some teams near the bottom of the seeding list had identical fencer codes to get the matchups that seemed to work best (i.e. not having ClubX's A team fence ClubX's B and ClubY's A team fence ClubY's B team in the first round, but rather have ClubX's A team fence ClubY's B team and vice versa)... worked out pretty well, and everyone was happy.

yay engarde.

-w
__________________
Prise de Fer SYC 2009 Dates Announced!
Boys: March 14 & 15, 2009
Girls: April 4 & 5, 2009
Events will be held at Dana Hall school again.
DJ Apostrophe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 12:24 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 911
tbryan has a reputation beyond reputetbryan has a reputation beyond reputetbryan has a reputation beyond reputetbryan has a reputation beyond reputetbryan has a reputation beyond reputetbryan has a reputation beyond reputetbryan has a reputation beyond reputetbryan has a reputation beyond reputetbryan has a reputation beyond reputetbryan has a reputation beyond reputetbryan has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Apostrophe
This past Sunday (div I / Sr. Team Quals) I did a little tweaking a few times when some teams near the bottom of the seeding list had identical fencer codes to get the matchups that seemed to work best (i.e. not having ClubX's A team fence ClubX's B and ClubY's A team fence ClubY's B team in the first round, but rather have ClubX's A team fence ClubY's B team and vice versa)... worked out pretty well, and everyone was happy.
I thought that only one team per club was allowed to fence at qualifying events (and at Nationals) these days.
tbryan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 12:48 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Frank Pratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cartersville, GA
Posts: 630
Frank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbryan
I thought that only one team per club was allowed to fence at qualifying events (and at Nationals) these days.
Only one team per club can qualify for the nationals in each weapon/category. I'm not sure if this prohibits a club from entering more than one team in the Divisional Qualifers, though. Good question.
__________________

To be predictable is to be hit often.

Last edited by Frank Pratt; 03-29-2006 at 12:55 PM.
Frank Pratt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 12:48 PM   #8
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 8,914
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbryan
I thought that only one team per club was allowed to fence at qualifying events (and at Nationals) these days.
Only one may fence at nationals and only the top team from a given club at the qualifier counts towards qualifying, but clubs may enter multiple teams.

If you have 5 clubs, 1 enters 3 teams, 2 enter 2 each, and the last two enter just one each and the results look like:

1) Club1a
2) Club2b
3) Club1c
4) Club4
5) Club2a
6) Club1b
7) Club3a
8) Club5
9) Club3b

Then, for qualification purposes you have 5 clubs entered (so 4 qualifying slots). For ranking for those slots you have the list:
Club1
Club2
Club4
Club3
Club5
The first 4 clubs on that list have qualified.

Of course qualifying is only an issue if you have 5 or more clubs entering teams. 4 or fewer and everyone's getting a slot.

Note: the members of a club's team at the qualifier do not have to be the same as those at Nationals. The club can pick and choose who to have be on the team once it's qualified.

-B
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 01:04 PM   #9
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 8,914
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poulet
That introduces an interesting possibility: if your club has nothing but crappy fencers, and lots of them, one could inflate the number of qualifying teams by sending as many teams as possible to the qualifier... Then, even if this club's teams finish below all the others, they'd still qualify ?
Note what I wrote. The number of clubs is what determines the number of qualifying slots. Not the number of teams entered.

What flooding the tournament COULD allow is increased odds of one of your teams scoring a lucky upset and advancing up into qualifying position.

-B
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 01:05 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
oso97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 3,274
oso97 has a reputation beyond reputeoso97 has a reputation beyond reputeoso97 has a reputation beyond reputeoso97 has a reputation beyond reputeoso97 has a reputation beyond reputeoso97 has a reputation beyond reputeoso97 has a reputation beyond reputeoso97 has a reputation beyond reputeoso97 has a reputation beyond reputeoso97 has a reputation beyond reputeoso97 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to oso97
The number of qualifying teams is based upon the number of USFA Clubs represented, not the number of teams at the qualifiers.
__________________
"Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado." - Emiliano Zapata

"Layla, you got me on my knees" - Eric Clapton
oso97 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 01:11 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
RoninX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,353
RoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to RoninX
If a club qualifies a team, but some or all of the members that fenced on the qualifying team cannot make it. Can other club members be slotted in the team in their places?
__________________
"I cannot ensure success, I can only endeavor to deserve it" - Capt. John Paul Jones
RoninX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 01:13 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
epeemike81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dana Hall School, Wellesely, MA
Posts: 3,820
epeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to epeemike81
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poulet
That introduces an interesting possibility: if your club has nothing but crappy fencers, and lots of them, one could inflate the number of qualifying teams by sending as many teams as possible to the qualifier... Then, even if this club's teams finish below all the others, they'd still qualify ?
not true. as Brad pointed out, you determine the number of clubs that qualify based on the number of CLUBS not the number of TEAMS. which is why in his example, despite having 9 teams (which according to the chart is 5 qualifiers), only four qualified due to only having 5 clubs represented.

Additional teams from the same club do NOT inflate the number of qualifying teams.

-m
epeemike81 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 01:15 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
epeemike81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dana Hall School, Wellesely, MA
Posts: 3,820
epeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond reputeepeemike81 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to epeemike81
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoninX
If a club qualifies a team, but some or all of the members that fenced on the qualifying team cannot make it. Can other club members be slotted in the team in their places?
Yes. you qualify a team from a club, not a collection of fencers. the team at qualifiers needn't have any members in common with the team at nationals.

-m
epeemike81 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 01:15 PM   #14
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,151
KD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to KD5MDK
Yes. The only requirement is that the members of the team that fence at Nationals be from the same club as the team that qualified.
KD5MDK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 01:34 PM   #15
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 8,914
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
Quote:
Originally Posted by KD5MDK
Yes. The only requirement is that the members of the team that fence at Nationals be from the same club as the team that qualified.
And have represented that club in competition in that season prior to Nationals.

-B
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 02:02 PM   #16
mfp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 646
mfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by oiuyt
And have represented that club in competition in that season prior to Nationals.

-B
And have an A, B or C classification if the event is Div I team.
mfp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 02:04 PM   #17
Fencing Expert
 
oiuyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsauken, NJ
Posts: 8,914
oiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond reputeoiuyt has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to oiuyt
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfp
And have an A, B or C classification if the event is Div I team.
For that matter, be the correct gender. :eyeroll:

-B
__________________
"Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
oiuyt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 02:10 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
RoninX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,353
RoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond reputeRoninX has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to RoninX
Thanks for the answers. Let me guess, they must also be USFA members and are required to bring multiple sets of working equipment to the piste.
__________________
"I cannot ensure success, I can only endeavor to deserve it" - Capt. John Paul Jones
RoninX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 02:20 PM   #19
mfp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 646
mfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond reputemfp has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by oiuyt
For that matter, be the correct gender. :eyeroll:

-B
I doubt many divisions will get the gender wrong, however this year I wouldn't be surprised that some will miss the new restriction that Div I qual event team members need to be A, B, C classified

:biggereyeroll:
mfp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 02:32 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Frank Pratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cartersville, GA
Posts: 630
Frank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud ofFrank Pratt has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoninX
Thanks for the answers. Let me guess, they must also be USFA members and are required to bring multiple sets of working equipment to the piste.
...and be U.S. citizens or Permanent Residents.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfp
I doubt many divisions will get the gender wrong, however this year I wouldn't be surprised that some will miss the new restriction that Div I qual event team members need to be A, B, C classified

:biggereyeroll:
Good point. The rule was just put into place last month.
__________________

To be predictable is to be hit often.
Frank Pratt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads<