03-16-2006, 07:34 AM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,859
| Aids Council I consider this as a very interesting article as it shows a pure contradiction where contradiction is the LEAST needed.
Opinions? http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid27710.asp
__________________ Beat it...Jab it...Stab it...FENCE IT!!! ***little t***Fiskebäckskil!*** |
| | | And now for this message... | |
03-16-2006, 09:29 AM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,035
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Pauli | Great. Now my company's website tracker thinks I'm surfing gay websites. I suggest to those a bit more astute than I, that if you haven't hit the link yet, wait until you're not in the office. |
| |
03-16-2006, 10:01 AM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 141
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Slim Great. Now my company's website tracker thinks I'm surfing gay websites. I suggest to those a bit more astute than I, that if you haven't hit the link yet, wait until you're not in the office. | Sorry Slim, I made the same mistake as you a few hours ago, and should have put out the warning you did. My bad. |
| |
03-17-2006, 12:20 PM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,859
|
possibly your website tracker is set to avoid all that has the word "Bush" in it.
Well, it seems that it's too much of a difficult topic and of no interest. Not a prob.
Gav: pls close this post
p.s. Sheez, now here you have a "language barrier". I totally wasn't aware this was a gay website....... I posted it for the article, not for the website.....
__________________ Beat it...Jab it...Stab it...FENCE IT!!! ***little t***Fiskebäckskil!***
Last edited by Pauli; 03-17-2006 at 12:30 PM.
|
| |
03-17-2006, 04:00 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Carstairs, AB, Canada
Posts: 3,361
| Heh. This raises an interesting question...
At what point in the past did searching the Internet for the term "Bush" return more politics then pornography?
James.
__________________
If it's stupid, but it works, it's not stupid.
|
| |
03-17-2006, 04:52 PM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,117
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by jBirch Heh. This raises an interesting question...
At what point in the past did searching the Internet for the term "Bush" return more politics then pornography?
James. |
I don't know.. do you have safe search set on your search engine, or not? |
| |
03-17-2006, 04:58 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Carstairs, AB, Canada
Posts: 3,361
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Larrison I don't know.. do you have safe search set on your search engine, or not? | Google. No safe search (though I had to re-run the query to be sure).
James.
__________________
If it's stupid, but it works, it's not stupid.
|
| |
03-18-2006, 02:06 AM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 1999 Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Posts: 2,993
| To return to the substance of the topic, leaving aside the various permutations of "Bush" on the internet (frankly, I think the political "Bush" is far more obscene than any so-called pornography, but let that lie undisturbed...)
The phrase "setting the fox to guard the henhouse" comes to mind. Appointing people to oversee the covert dismantling of the very agencies/councils/boards they ostensibly are protecting and promoting is a common tactic of the Bush administration--witness his appointments to the EPA.
__________________ Nothing is more frightening than ignorance in action. |
| |
03-18-2006, 04:29 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,986
| Right - so Bush appointing a homophobe to serve on an AIDS panel should not be a surprise to anyone.
Side note to those worried that their browsing to a gay site could get them in trouble: maybe that should lead to a little appreciate for what groups like the ACLU do to protect you...
__________________
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different."
|
| |
03-19-2006, 04:18 AM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 1999 Location: Australia - various
Posts: 2,756
| This doesnt really surprise me in the slightest. Since when has any administration (be it American or any other) actually appointed people to committees who knew what was going on? The day a helath minister is a doctor with experience as a GP is the day I eat my hat.
__________________ You may love me but you dont accept me. I dont want your love without your acceptance. |
| |
03-20-2006, 12:28 AM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,117
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Zelda This doesnt really surprise me in the slightest. Since when has any administration (be it American or any other) actually appointed people to committees who knew what was going on? The day a helath minister is a doctor with experience as a GP is the day I eat my hat. | Just for grins, I went and looked up the bio of the current US Surgeon General. I recall at least one was a fairly well experienced MD (koop) who was a bit outspken. The current US Surgeon General is Richard H. Carmona.
His bio is at http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/aboutoffice.html#biosg
Dr. Carmona has worked in various positions in the medical field including paramedic, registered nurse and physician. Dr. Carmona completed a surgical residency at the University of California, San Francisco, and a National Institutes of Health-sponsored fellowship in trauma, burns and critical care. Dr. Carmona is a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons, and is also certified in correctional health care and in quality assurance.
Well, maybe not experience as a GP, but seems to have a bit of experience in the field.. |
| |
03-20-2006, 04:17 AM
|
#12 | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,563
| 2 things occur to me after reading this thread:
1 : I've been asked to close the thread and will now do so. ]
2 : That some people seem incapable of seperating the concept of AIDS, homosexuality and what is appropriate for looking at at work. Frankly; if your office has a stict Internet access policy then you shouldn't even be looking at this site. Your average admin is not going to care that you are looking at a gay site - your sexuality being your own business and no one else's - only that you are not surfing material likely to cause offence; most likely pornography and most likely images. This sort of material can be straight, Bi, metro, up, down, donkey, plant, pasta ... whatever, but is unlikely to include a straight (ha ha ha) gay information site. Get a grip people - I thought it was supposed to be us brits who were uptight about sex.
Last edited by Gav; 03-20-2006 at 08:32 AM.
|
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | Writing Council | Swordsman | Discussion Archive | 18 | 08-24-2001 12:35 PM | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 PM. |