topleft topright

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Senior Member Array jeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    It's a dry heat
    Posts
    6,725

    Warp drive patent application

    Read this: http://patentlaw.typepad.com/patent/...quests_mo.html

    The best parts are the "Comments" section - scroll down for it
    "In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different."

  2. #2
    Din Älskling Array esskreemr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Somewhere inside your head. Or am I?
    Posts
    4,237
    It was a stupid idea for the applicant to submit this patent. Everybody knows that the government would deem it a threat to national security, claim the patent and farm it out for free to Lockheed-Martin...
    "Since when does being a patriot in America mean shutting your mouth?"
    ---

    zz,zz,zz,zz,zz,zz!

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    693
    So wait... if it alters the space time continuum... its not really a warp drive but a time machine? sweeeeet.

    Best comment on that page, "Took long enough!! Now I can tap some klingon babes!!"
    The sweet is never sweet without the sour.

  4. #4
    Just Joined Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Berkshire, UK
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Epee Scherma
    So wait... if it alters the space time continuum... its not really a warp drive but a time machine? sweeeeet.
    Doen't that fall under Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle? Where the act of observation determines state (e.g. light being particle or wave). Or in this case, where you are on the fence determines whether it's a space or time travel machine.

    Besides... "setback"? Everyone knows that you can't patent an idea - Patents Offices require prototypes. The article writer samples too much of his own supply.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array MikeHarm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Ypsilanti, Mi USA
    Posts
    1,651
    Blog Entries
    94
    I've never bought into the uncertaintly principle, I think the theory was skewed by misunderstanding the dimensional structure that the observations were taking place in.


  6. #6
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    66
    Quote Originally Posted by Jumile
    Doen't that fall under Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle? Where the act of observation determines state (e.g. light being particle or wave). Or in this case, where you are on the fence determines whether it's a space or time travel machine.

    Besides... "setback"? Everyone knows that you can't patent an idea - Patents Offices require prototypes. The article writer samples too much of his own supply.

    Just as a point of fact (from my patent law class this semester) here in the US we do *not* have to have a working prototype to show that an idea has been 'reduced to practice' in otherwords, constructive practice is ok, so long as the machine can be built according to the patent and work... if it doesn't work, well, theres a problem, and the patent is most likely going to be invalidated. of course, in the UK, you may have totally different rules..

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array Aqua_volans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Singapore,
    Posts
    478
    i think these guys are about as unrealistic as me trying to build a thermonuclear warhead at home. XD
    Signature unnecessary

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array Epee_Pox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    ---->
    Posts
    2,171
    I actually found the patent application itself to be more entertaining than the comments section. It's like they read a couple chapters of a science-lite book, didn't bother to bone up on the actual equations and concepts, and made a halfhearted effort to even make sense.

    Well, at least they had to pay some patent lawyers and bureaucracy fees to submit and re-submit this, so there was SOME benefit to the world from their ideas.
    Just because you have the right, that doesn't mean it is right.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array Epee_Pox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    ---->
    Posts
    2,171
    Quote Originally Posted by Aqua_volans
    i think these guys are about as unrealistic as me trying to build a thermonuclear warhead at home. XD

    What's so unrealistic about that? All you do is,







    /deletion.bot.2EE5A-G8BB-A49F911.nsa.gov/






    and there you go. Honestly, some people don't bother to just look things up any more.
    Just because you have the right, that doesn't mean it is right.

Similar Threads

  1. Straight up now, tell me.
    By rmyounis in forum Game Threads
    Replies: 3187
    Last Post: 02-28-2010, 07:55 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-08-2005, 04:34 PM
  3. Report On FIE Congress, Leipzig, 2003/11/22-23
    By pkt in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-20-2004, 05:18 PM
  4. Patent
    By fencinman89 in forum Water Cooler
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-19-2004, 03:32 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30