| |
-
Senior Member
Array Warp drive patent application Read this: http://patentlaw.typepad.com/patent/...quests_mo.html
The best parts are the "Comments" section - scroll down for it "In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different." -
Din Älskling
Array It was a stupid idea for the applicant to submit this patent. Everybody knows that the government would deem it a threat to national security, claim the patent and farm it out for free to Lockheed-Martin... "Since when does being a patriot in America mean shutting your mouth?"
--- zz,zz,zz,zz,zz,zz! -
So wait... if it alters the space time continuum... its not really a warp drive but a time machine? sweeeeet.
Best comment on that page, "Took long enough!! Now I can tap some klingon babes!!" The sweet is never sweet without the sour. -
 Originally Posted by Epee Scherma So wait... if it alters the space time continuum... its not really a warp drive but a time machine? sweeeeet. Doen't that fall under Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle? Where the act of observation determines state (e.g. light being particle or wave). Or in this case, where you are on the fence determines whether it's a space or time travel machine. 
Besides... "setback"? Everyone knows that you can't patent an idea - Patents Offices require prototypes. The article writer samples too much of his own supply. -
Senior Member
Array I've never bought into the uncertaintly principle, I think the theory was skewed by misunderstanding the dimensional structure that the observations were taking place in. -
 Originally Posted by Jumile Doen't that fall under Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle? Where the act of observation determines state (e.g. light being particle or wave). Or in this case, where you are on the fence determines whether it's a space or time travel machine.
Besides... "setback"? Everyone knows that you can't patent an idea - Patents Offices require prototypes. The article writer samples too much of his own supply. 
Just as a point of fact (from my patent law class this semester) here in the US we do *not* have to have a working prototype to show that an idea has been 'reduced to practice' in otherwords, constructive practice is ok, so long as the machine can be built according to the patent and work... if it doesn't work, well, theres a problem, and the patent is most likely going to be invalidated. of course, in the UK, you may have totally different rules.. -
Senior Member
Array i think these guys are about as unrealistic as me trying to build a thermonuclear warhead at home. XD -
Senior Member
Array I actually found the patent application itself to be more entertaining than the comments section. It's like they read a couple chapters of a science-lite book, didn't bother to bone up on the actual equations and concepts, and made a halfhearted effort to even make sense.
Well, at least they had to pay some patent lawyers and bureaucracy fees to submit and re-submit this, so there was SOME benefit to the world from their ideas. Just because you have the right, that doesn't mean it is right. -
Senior Member
Array  Originally Posted by Aqua_volans i think these guys are about as unrealistic as me trying to build a thermonuclear warhead at home. XD
What's so unrealistic about that? All you do is,
/deletion.bot.2EE5A-G8BB-A49F911.nsa.gov/
and there you go. Honestly, some people don't bother to just look things up any more. Just because you have the right, that doesn't mean it is right. Similar Threads -
By rmyounis in forum Game Threads
Replies: 3187
Last Post: 02-28-2010, 07:55 AM -
By esskreemr in forum Politics
Replies: 2
Last Post: 10-08-2005, 04:34 PM -
By pkt in forum Fencing Discussion
Replies: 13
Last Post: 01-20-2004, 05:18 PM -
By fencinman89 in forum Water Cooler
Replies: 24
Last Post: 01-19-2004, 03:32 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules |
| |