01-16-2006, 03:28 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: CC
Posts: 2,631
| Senior Men's Epee: Points List after Houston I may have made some mistakes, but here's the new list down to 40th.
1 Kelsey 5491
2 Mattern 3097
3 Sherrill 2690
4 Solomon 2497
5 Viviani 2245
6 Rivera 2235
7 Ungar 2075
8 Bratton 2040
9 Abend 1958
10 Erbele 1665
11 Hansen 1556
12 Sulat 1383
13T Cox 1381
13T Vaksman 1381
15 French, P 1319
16 Zucker 1260
17 Exum 1255
18 Harder 1200
19 Baby 1162
20 Ordody 1141
21 Henderson 1127
22 Thompson 1066
23 Stockdale 954
24 Howard 880
25 Tausig 870
26 Lichten 849
27 Feldschuh 796
28 Smith 785
29 Bruno 700
30 Rose 695
31 Wicas 686
32 Kenney, C 636
33 Manske 618
34 Hurme 582
35 O'Neal 560
36 O'Loughlin 535
37 Bethel 533
38 Rostal 506
39 Marshall 502
40 Roiz 500
__________________ My name is Isaac Erbele, and I approve this message |
| | | And now for this message... | |
01-16-2006, 04:05 PM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: North attleboro, MA
Posts: 1,845
| Is soren thompson not doing USFA stuff this year?
__________________
"Their interpretation is, however, refuted most elegantly by your system of radioactive atom + amplifier + charge of gun powder + cat in a box"
-Albert Einstein, in a letter to Erwin Schrödinger
|
| |
01-16-2006, 05:21 PM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: CC
Posts: 2,631
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by whtouche Is soren thompson not doing USFA stuff this year? | I'm not sure what his strategy is. I'll ask him next time I see him.
__________________ My name is Isaac Erbele, and I approve this message |
| |
01-17-2006, 12:29 PM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Bay Area
Posts: 4,693
| A friend of mine goes to Princeton, and I hear that Soren would really like to graduate at some point in time, especially considering all the time he took off to train for the olympics. Just what I heard through the grapevine, though.
__________________
"If I were ever to challenge you to a duel, your best bet would be battle axes in a very dark basement." Misquoted from The Prisoner
"Technical excellence is the antecedant of tactical creativity." - Nat Goodhartz
But those things which belong neither to God nor to Caeser, feeleth free to writeth them off, for yea, they are deductable.
|
| |
01-17-2006, 09:26 PM
|
#5 | | Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 65
| wow....i cant believe my old research lit teacher, mrs. ungar, was benjamin ungar's mother. neither did i know her son was that good. sheesh |
| |
01-20-2006, 07:00 PM
|
#6 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 80
| thanks Quote: |
Originally Posted by Army Fencer I may have made some mistakes, but here's the new list down to 40th.
1 Kelsey 5491
2 Mattern 3097
3 Sherrill 2690
4 Solomon 2497
5 Viviani 2245
6 Rivera 2235
7 Ungar 2075
8 Bratton 2040
9 Abend 1958
10 Erbele 1665
11 Hansen 1556
12 Sulat 1383
13T Cox 1381
13T Vaksman 1381
15 French, P 1319
16 Zucker 1260
17 Exum 1255
18 Harder 1200
19 Baby 1162
20 Ordody 1141
21 Henderson 1127
22 Thompson 1066
23 Stockdale 954
24 Howard 880
25 Tausig 870
26 Lichten 849
27 Feldschuh 796
28 Smith 785
29 Bruno 700
30 Rose 695
31 Wicas 686
32 Kenney, C 636
33 Manske 618
34 Hurme 582
35 O'Neal 560
36 O'Loughlin 535
37 Bethel 533
38 Rostal 506
39 Marshall 502
40 Roiz 500 | I know you tried, but it's the juniors who need their standings before making or not (expensive) commitments to the next world cup. It's Junior Team positioning right now, remember? |
| |
01-20-2006, 07:05 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: CC
Posts: 2,631
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by betty I know you tried, but it's the juniors who need their standings before making or not (expensive) commitments to the next world cup. It's Junior Team positioning right now, remember? | Having never been on the Junior Points list, it's not something with which I have intimate knowledge. All I tried to do was put up the Senior Men's Epee list, that's all. I'm sorry that it didn't help you.
__________________ My name is Isaac Erbele, and I approve this message |
| |
01-20-2006, 07:49 PM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: A mushroom near the Mediterranean
Posts: 238
| While it certainly is inconvenient that the USFA have not posted the point standings, for now, can't any junior fencer find out generally where s/he stands, if it is that urgent? After all, Army Fencer did it for the whole Senior Men's epee points list. |
| |
01-20-2006, 10:36 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,452
| Army: what formula are you using to calculate the points, since the Group II numbers were not set up at the time of publication of the Athlete's Handbook?
Four best domestic, plus four best international, or can extra, higher value international results override NAC scores?
__________________
"Fraud is the creation of trust. And then: its betrayal."
William Black, Ph.D.
|
| |
01-20-2006, 10:48 PM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: CC
Posts: 2,631
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Capt. Slo-mo Army: what formula are you using to calculate the points, since the Group II numbers were not set up at the time of publication of the Athlete's Handbook?
Four best domestic, plus four best international, or can extra, higher value international results override NAC scores? | (Three best domestic or Group II) plus any Group I.
That's the way it was last season, and for the people with a bunch of Group I and Group II points, I just added or subtracted based on the results from Houston.
I have no clue how to calculate Junior points because I've never had any stake in them (sorry).
__________________ My name is Isaac Erbele, and I approve this message |
| |
01-21-2006, 12:00 AM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,452
| Army: I'm trying to calculate the Senior points, but the Handbook says to tabulate four best results from Domestic meets. 3. After Jan NAC to before Apr NAC
All previous season unless indicated
• Dec NAC DIV I (current season)
• Jan NAC DIV I (current season)
• Apr NAC DIV I
• Jul DIV I Nationals
It also says: Points earned at Satellite or “B” competitions that are not restricted by age can be considered Group I Points for Senior point standings.
Group II Rolling Point Standings are calculated in a similar manner to the Group II Team Points
Group II Point calculations unavailable at time of publication.
Yet the National Rankings table on the USFA page makes no reference to Group 1 nor Group 2 points, just designated and non-designated. Hence my confusion about what counts and what doesn't, and how many international points count for what total.
__________________
"Fraud is the creation of trust. And then: its betrayal."
William Black, Ph.D.
|
| |
01-21-2006, 12:11 AM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: CC
Posts: 2,631
| First, I screwed up with what I said was my calculation:
(Top three national and Group I tournaments) and any Group II
Group I = Non-designated
Group II = Designated
As far as the top four national tournaments is concerned, that's news to me (and rather sucky news because I didn't get points at the last NAC). I'll have to do some research and probably need to redo the number.
Does that help?
__________________ My name is Isaac Erbele, and I approve this message |
| |
01-21-2006, 12:16 AM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,452
| Ok, I think I've finally deciphered what the USFA is doing to calculate senior points. This is the only combination I could find that comes anywhere close to what they have posted on the website.
First, you take the 3, not four as per the Handbook, best domestic scores, plus the four best international scores, designated or not.
If you only have 2 or less domestic scores, then next best international scores are added in to the domestic count to bring that count to three scores. If you have any left over international scores that exceed any of the three domestic scores, you substitute the greater international for the lesser domestic.
Seems weird, but it makes the point totals appear to match what's on the USFA website.
__________________
"Fraud is the creation of trust. And then: its betrayal."
William Black, Ph.D.
|
| |
01-21-2006, 12:24 AM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: CC
Posts: 2,631
| I think you're right: the points right before the Houston NAC only included three national tournaments (contrary to the Athlete's Handbook).
As far as understand, designated points from international competitions are added to your score... not sure about a number limit. Non-designated points are the only points that replace your worst national score.
__________________ My name is Isaac Erbele, and I approve this message |
| |
01-21-2006, 02:17 AM
|
#15 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,235
| Ahh, reverse engineering... |
| |
01-21-2006, 12:42 PM
|
#16 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 293
| Selection criteria There was actually an email sent out in November detailing the selection critieria for the senior teams. This is not in the athlete handbook as it must have gone to press before they made up their mind. You can see that they count 3 of the 4 Group I competitions and up to 5 Group II events (for m & w epee).
The rolling points will be used to determine ranking until after the April NAC. After that, everything that is not in one of the categories below gets dropped (ie, last season's world cup events).
Below are the selection criteria for the 2006 Sr World Team. These were not available at the time of the Athlete Handbook Publication.
Men’s Epee, Men’s Foil, Men’s Sabre, Women’s Epee, Women’s Foil
SUM OF GROUP I AND GROUP II
GROUP I – SUM OF THREE HIGHEST POINTS, 1-5,
1 NAC Division I competitions [Dec., Jan., April]
2. Division I National Championships [previous season]
3 European “B” Competitions [Dec.- July]
4 Competitions specified in item 6 below and not included in Group II sum.
5. Non Designated “A” Competitions [Dec.- July]
GROUP II – BY WEAPON: SUM OF THE POINTS AT ‘X’ COMPETITIONS LISTED IN THE TABLE BELOW
6. Designated Senior “A” Competitions [Dec.- July] & previous season World
Championships (for World Championships – only top 32 results may be counted).
Epee Foil Sabre
Men’s 5 6 6
Women’s 5 4 NA |
| |
01-21-2006, 01:21 PM
|
#17 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,452
| And what about WS? Since that wasn't on your list...
__________________
"Fraud is the creation of trust. And then: its betrayal."
William Black, Ph.D.
|
| |
01-21-2006, 01:57 PM
|
#18 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 293
| Ws Sorry, I thought we were just talking about epee. WS is below.
Women’s Sabre
GROUP I – SUM OF THREE HIGHEST POINTS, 1-3
1. NAC Division I competitions [Dec., Jan., April]
2. Division I National Championships [previous season]
3. Competitions specified in item 4 below and not included in Group II sum.
GROUP II – SUM OF THE POINTS AT 6 COMPETITIONS LISTED BELOW
4. Designated Senior “A” Competitions [Dec.- July] & previous season World Championships |
| |
01-21-2006, 02:06 PM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,452
| T:
Do you have a copy of the full description for Senior Team points details? (as in, what's in the "listed below", non-designated events, etc)
I seem to have not gotten that e-mail.
Thanks!
__________________
"Fraud is the creation of trust. And then: its betrayal."
William Black, Ph.D.
|
| |
01-21-2006, 02:34 PM
|
#20 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 293
| Attached I have copied the email to a Word document and attached it. There is some other stuff included in the document as well that was sent out in one of those bulk emails from the USFA sometime in November. That is all of the info I have.
Last edited by T; 02-02-2006 at 12:27 AM.
|
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |