topleft topright

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    748

    List of confirmed entries for NAC C ?

    Is is too much to expect from USFA?

    Hint: something like askfred.net would provide realtime online registration
    with online payments, no faxes or other paperwork required.....
    and it is ready to use NOW !!!


    .
    Last edited by misha; 11-22-2005 at 09:18 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Array OROD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    [ SFFC ] ~)---------- San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    3,084
    Quote Originally Posted by misha
    Is is too much to expect from USFA?
    Yes.


    .

  3. #3
    Fencing Expert Array dknj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Brookly, NY
    Posts
    211
    The office is closed for the holiday this week.
    I'm sure I'll get it to post next week.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array oso97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,904
    Quote Originally Posted by dknj
    The office is closed for the holiday this week.
    I'm sure I'll get it to post next week.
    This highlights the whole problem with the system. It gets faxed in, then entered by hand, then that list is sent to someone else to post online, and someone else to seed for the tournament...

    Even if we could eliminate ONE of those steps by the use of a good OIM (Online Information Management) system (like, oh, I dunno, FRED?) it would save the USFA time and money. If the system is setup where the USFA is APPROVING entries instead of entering them... well, now we're talking about saving some serious bucks.
    That's it, I'm done with the discussion forums on F.net. It's had its uses, but the ideologues, ranters, and "experts" have drowned too many of the conversations. I'm changing my password to something random and never logging in again.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array RITFencing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wherever I may roam
    Posts
    5,163
    Blog Entries
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by oso97
    This highlights the whole problem with the system. It gets faxed in, then entered by hand, then that list is sent to someone else to post online, and someone else to seed for the tournament...

    Even if we could eliminate ONE of those steps by the use of a good OIM (Online Information Management) system (like, oh, I dunno, FRED?) it would save the USFA time and money. If the system is setup where the USFA is APPROVING entries instead of entering them... well, now we're talking about saving some serious bucks.
    "Gee, oso, do you think that might lead to lower entry fees?"
    "If I were ever to challenge you to a duel, your best bet would be battle axes in a very dark basement." Misquoted from The Prisoner

    "Technical excellence is the antecedant of tactical creativity." - Nat Goodhartz

    But those things which belong neither to God nor to Caeser, feeleth free to writeth them off, for yea, they are deductable.

  6. #6
    JEC
    JEC is offline
    Senior Member Array JEC's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    3,114
    Quote Originally Posted by RITFencing
    "Gee, oso, do you think that might lead to lower entry fees?"
    Are you kidding? Any savings will be transferred into the "support our elite fencers and our burocracy" account. Sorry, for being cynical. They will argue that the online service is costing them money and thus, need to charge us more to register. I wouldn't mind if the service is at the level than AskFred provides already for FREE, and if AskFred is the choosen service, I would support a small fee per person per event for the ability to archive and search all my results, bouts, etc. on-line in a relative quick manner as Askfred does.
    Epee is the Sword.

  7. #7
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    33,800
    Quote Originally Posted by JEC
    Are you kidding? Any savings will be transferred into the "support our elite fencers and our burocracy" account. Sorry, for being cynical.
    Don't apologize, "cynical" is not a synonym for "wrong" in this case ( alas ).

Similar Threads

  1. Georgia Division Mailing List
    By Frank Pratt in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-16-2005, 10:49 PM
  2. [CFML] Re: Resigning from List
    By Christopher J Umbs in forum Classical Fencing Mailing List
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-25-2005, 03:00 PM
  3. Confirmed entries up on USFA website
    By Peach in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-15-2005, 05:00 PM
  4. Re: [CFML] Is this email list working properly ? (Was Flicks)
    By Kim Moser in forum Classical Fencing Mailing List
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-02-2004, 02:00 PM
  5. Olympics Rare Entries Contest
    By haroldbuck in forum Water Cooler
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-14-2004, 01:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30