topleft topright

Closed Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 35 of 35
  1. #21
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,807

    Gustafssonīs Corollary to Godwins Law

    Hi!


    Gustafssonīs corollary:
    Whenever a discussion not starting about Clinton, Lewinsky, lies and perjury delve into those topics, the discussion has become useless.


    Have a nice time!

    Peter Gustafsson

  2. #22
    Senior Member Array RITFencing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wherever I may roam
    Posts
    5,163
    Blog Entries
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason
    Sex is the only reason that people remember Clinton's lies and quickly forget the other ones--in spite of the death tolls the others may have brought.
    I've got to go with epee pox here. Lies and perjury are two different things, and while neither one should really be tolerated, if we begin to give tacit permission for perjury, the whole judicial system goes right out the window.
    "If I were ever to challenge you to a duel, your best bet would be battle axes in a very dark basement." Misquoted from The Prisoner

    "Technical excellence is the antecedant of tactical creativity." - Nat Goodhartz

    But those things which belong neither to God nor to Caeser, feeleth free to writeth them off, for yea, they are deductable.

  3. #23
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,121
    Quote Originally Posted by RITFencing
    I've got to go with epee pox here. Lies and perjury are two different things, and while neither one should really be tolerated, if we begin to give tacit permission for perjury, the whole judicial system goes right out the window.
    I've been keeping quiet on this one, but I'm going in with this as well. The impeachment trial with Clinton was not about sex, it was if the President of the United States, who has some immunity from prosecution from the position of his office, committed grand jury perjury, civil suit perjury, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power. The majority of the House of Representative voted there was enough evidence to put him on trial in the US Senate (that was "impeachment"), but the result of the trial was less than 2/3rd of the Senate concluded that this was enough to remove him from office so he could be prosecuted under law. He did receive a majority vote (55-45) that he had committed perjury, but this was not enough for a Senate conviction. The obstruction of justice charge deadlocked at 50-50.

    *IF* BillC has stood up and said "Yes I did it with Monica and it was wrong and I won't do it again", nothing would or could have been done legally. On the other hand, Hillary probably would have killed the man... (and I'm joking, OK?) But the issue was that he screwed up by falsely giving testimony and it looks like he urged others to also do the same.

    Perjury, particularly by a high elected official who is given some immunity to the law by the position of his office, is always serious. He's given that position through the trust of the citizens, and he should never do anything to damage that. He is held to a higher standard.

    BillC's perjury evidence was enough that his Arkansas law license was revoked, and he was suspended from the bar of the US Supreme Court. He also was given a $90,000 fine for contempt of court in the Federal courts, and was fined over $900,000 in a civil case related to this (the exact terms were never disclosed, I don't believe).

    And if Cheney or Rove or any one else in Federal office has committed perjury, I want to hold them to an equivalent standard. Agnew (a Republican) was booted in around 1970 for things he did when he was not in Federal office -- so if these bozo's did something while in Federal office, appointed or not, then the same standards hold.

  4. #24
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    351
    q: why can't republicans make jokes like this?
    a: because the republicans aren't comedians. and they aren't trying to be funny. if rush limbaugh was a comedian, i would laugh if he made a funny ad.

    q: how come al franken can say anything he wants under the guise of humor?
    a: because the vast majority of us can tell what is funny and what is political commentary. you, apparently, can not. here's an example:

    al saying that his book is on sale - political/serious
    people saying that his book was funny - political/serious
    people saying that his book was informative - political/serious
    man saying that he ordered 5 copies of the book - funny
    extremely ignorant stereotypical republican hating the book and getting beaten up - funny

    i think that's pretty straightforward

    q: [whine]meanhh, democrats and minorities can make jokes and we can't[/whine]
    a: not true, but when you're anti affirmative action, rich, and white, you're probably going to have to be a little more careful about the jokes you make. if you were a comedian, you would know that. but you're not. if you've noticed, for example, comedians that make black people/white people jokes tend to have a certain skin characteristic in common. and beleive it or not, white comedians don't complain about this. they deal with it. hell, they're the ones who can get normal jobs.

    q: why are we talking about clinton?
    a: you got me! it sure seems to me that this argument ran its course about 7 years ago, and everyone made up their mind 3 years ago, minimum. it's certainly not like anyone's changing their minds.

    q: you're a very wise man
    a: thank you.

  5. #25
    Senior Member Array Have At You's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    864
    Quote Originally Posted by Amadeus
    q: you're a very wise man
    a: thank you.
    beat me to it.
    "What did I tell you about being stupid? You don't get a birthday this year."

  6. #26
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    33,804
    Man. I gave up on that about 2 paragraphs into that last post.

    Amadeus, no offense meant, but there's a reason that standard English uses capital letters: clarity...

  7. #27
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata
    Man. I gave up on that about 2 paragraphs into that last post.

    Amadeus, no offense meant, but there's a reason that standard English uses capital letters: clarity...
    SORRY ABOUT THAT I'LL TRY TO KEEP THAT IN MIND FOR NEXT TIME.

    No, in all seriousness, i'll try harder. It's mostly a bad habit.

  8. #28
    Fencing Expert Array achilleus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    greece
    Posts
    3,379
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata
    Man. I gave up on that about 2 paragraphs into that last post.

    Amadeus, no offense meant, but there's a reason that standard English uses capital letters: clarity...
    And ya know what else? I couldn't help but think, wouldn't a wise man know that some of the questions posed were actually statements and not questions?
    We're no threat, people, we're not dirty, we're not mean
    We love everybody but we do as we please
    When the weather's fine,
    We go fishin' or go swimmin' in the sea
    We're always happy
    Life's for livin', yeah, that's our philosophy

  9. #29
    Senior Member Array Araznal's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    NYC/Brandeis
    Posts
    1,128
    To get back on topic here...

    I've had the "pleasure" of overhearing AirAmerica as my Grandmother listens to it like it's Gospel (God help her, she scares me). I have to say that the programming is just as frightening as Rush Limbaugh's ranting. These people are talking about Bush and co. and I believe that given the chance, would kill every last one of them because they hate them so much. I don't even say that about Rush. I mean, the staff there are so angry in every way, and I'm very frightened that they will get their hands on some nuclear device and "take matters into their own hands". The far left is just as scary as the far right, and when they repeatedly come close to actually threatening people, I take that very seriously. (how ridiculous is it that Jerry Springer is the most level-headed of these people? I mean, I actually respect him despite selling out for that crappy show, but still...)

    However, political satire is a way of venting that anger. I agree with Jason here (big surprise...) about the weak using comedy to get some kind of upper hand. The reason it hasn't been used by the right is because they associate with Christianity, and, as we all know, Christ said unto the masses, "and ye shall never laugh again."

    Just to be fair, I'll make a joke about Jews so nobody has to get all pissed at me here:

    And when Joshua circled the city of Jericho the seventh time, he stopped at the front gate with all the Israelites, and they cvetched until the walls came crumbling down.
    "What, really? I thought that song was just about a dragon who lived by the sea and frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called Honah Lee."

    "Dan, you're such a dumb*ss"


    Read it, be happy: Funny

  10. #30
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by Araznal
    I've had the "pleasure" of overhearing AirAmerica as my Grandmother listens to it like it's Gospel (God help her, she scares me). I have to say that the programming is just as frightening as Rush Limbaugh's ranting. These people are talking about Bush and co. and I believe that given the chance, would kill every last one of them because they hate them so much. I don't even say that about Rush. I mean, the staff there are so angry in every way, and I'm very frightened that they will get their hands on some nuclear device and "take matters into their own hands". The far left is just as scary as the far right, and when they repeatedly come close to actually threatening people, I take that very seriously. (how ridiculous is it that Jerry Springer is the most level-headed of these people? I mean, I actually respect him despite selling out for that crappy show, but still...)
    I agree. the liberal media has an insanity of their own. And when i read his books, i certainly take everything al franken says with a certain amount of skepticism. But the anger and stupidity is certainly reciprocated by the right wing lunatics, and they have a 24 hour news network as opposed to a dying radio program.

    And plus, though al franken is a lunatic sometimes, this ad was completely independant of his political opinions.

    (Inquartata, you should be pleased to know that i capitalized this just for you)

  11. #31
    Gav
    Gav is online now
    Moderator Array Gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    6,561
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata
    Man. I gave up on that about 2 paragraphs into that last post.

    Amadeus, no offense meant, but there's a reason that standard English uses capital letters: clarity...

    Rep to Inq.

  12. #32
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    33,804
    Quote Originally Posted by Amadeus
    I agree. the liberal media has an insanity of their own. And when i read his books, i certainly take everything al franken says with a certain amount of skepticism. But the anger and stupidity is certainly reciprocated by the right wing lunatics, and they have a 24 hour news network as opposed to a dying radio program.

    And plus, though al franken is a lunatic sometimes, this ad was completely independant of his political opinions.

    (Inquartata, you should be pleased to know that i capitalized this just for you)
    Thanks. Although, see bold emphases above...

    We appreciate the good-faith effort, though.

  13. #33
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    8,107
    Quote Originally Posted by Inquartata
    Thanks. Although, see bold emphases above...

    We appreciate the good-faith effort, though.
    The 'A' in 'Amadeus' stands for "half-assed"

  14. #34
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbiggs
    The 'A' in 'Amadeus' stands for "half-assed"
    well the b in mrbiggs stands for shut up.

    although i guess it was a kind of halfassed effort.

  15. #35
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    8,107
    Quote Originally Posted by Amadeus
    well the b in mrbiggs stands for shut up.

    although i guess it was a kind of halfassed effort.
    That retort was pretty poor, too.

Similar Threads

  1. Good way to practice blade control?
    By Nocturne265 in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-13-2005, 10:14 AM
  2. Gun Control
    By laughingduelist in forum Water Cooler
    Replies: 175
    Last Post: 04-21-2004, 08:22 PM
  3. [CFML] Getting heavy hitters under control
    By Patrick Shannon in forum Classical Fencing Mailing List
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-08-2003, 09:00 PM
  4. Point Control software warning
    By BarryTice in forum Discussion Archive
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-21-2001, 05:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30