Are there new timings for sabre being tested by FIE this year? - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > General Fencing > Fencing Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2005, 01:17 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
ViewtifulMisho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 376
ViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond repute
Are there new timings for sabre being tested by FIE this year?

Someone told me that the lockout time for sabre is being changed, by the FIE, to be between the old and the current time. Any truth to this?
ViewtifulMisho is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 09-01-2005, 10:31 AM   #2
Fencing Expert
 
downunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Angel, London
Posts: 2,479
downunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond repute
you'll find out in november
downunder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2005, 02:15 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
ViewtifulMisho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 376
ViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond reputeViewtifulMisho has a reputation beyond repute
I tried and failed ):
ViewtifulMisho is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2005, 04:54 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Sabresque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 858
Sabresque has a reputation beyond reputeSabresque has a reputation beyond reputeSabresque has a reputation beyond reputeSabresque has a reputation beyond reputeSabresque has a reputation beyond reputeSabresque has a reputation beyond reputeSabresque has a reputation beyond reputeSabresque has a reputation beyond reputeSabresque has a reputation beyond reputeSabresque has a reputation beyond reputeSabresque has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Sabresque
I know at least there were testings and demonstrations done to try and prove the new timing's ineffectiveness in sabre and to get it lengthened to somewhere in between.
__________________
-Sabresque

"Those whippernsapper Be-Bop Bohemians!"
Sabresque is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2005, 10:22 PM   #5
Zhi
Member
 
Zhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Philippines
Posts: 49
Zhi will become famous soon enough
Im a sabre fencer, please post it up when there's a changes made....
Thanks
__________________
~ Play not because you have to but because you want to.


--)------------ Zhi
Zhi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 01:27 AM   #6
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,151
KD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to KD5MDK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabresque
I know at least there were testings and demonstrations done to try and prove the new timing's ineffectiveness in sabre and to get it lengthened to somewhere in between.
Eh? Any more information on this?
KD5MDK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 07:41 PM   #7
Fencing Expert
 
downunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Angel, London
Posts: 2,479
downunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond reputedownunder has a reputation beyond repute
Proposition Nr. 7 by the Hungarian Fencing Federation


Re-establish AT SABRE the blocking times at 300-350 milliseconds (instead of the current 120
milliseconds).



Motivation : The introduction of the current Rule at 120 milliseconds is unfavourable to a fencer, who
executes a parade-riposte because his opponent who attacks, after the parade, in leaving his blade
on the valid surface (by a « remise ») always precedes such a riposte executed so quickly. The new
Rule reduces the moderated actions of this weapon.




Opinion of the Commission : not in favour : however, some members of the Commission
confirm that the problem as described does exist and would be in favour of a slight increase in
the blockage time.






as i said guys, you'll find out in november...
downunder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 08:40 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
rcmatthews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 1,099
rcmatthews has a reputation beyond reputercmatthews has a reputation beyond reputercmatthews has a reputation beyond reputercmatthews has a reputation beyond reputercmatthews has a reputation beyond reputercmatthews has a reputation beyond reputercmatthews has a reputation beyond reputercmatthews has a reputation beyond reputercmatthews has a reputation beyond reputercmatthews has a reputation beyond reputercmatthews has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to rcmatthews
I think that somewhere in between might not be too bad of an idea. I think that the old timings were too long, favoring a slow attack that waits for a counter and then finishes, which in many instances I think should be a valid counter. However, the short timing causes remises to win over ripostes. Something in the range 175-200 might not be bad, but I really dont want to pay to get our chips replaced again.
__________________
Ich steige ab, Hab keine Zeit, Muss jetzt zu den anderen Pferden, Wollen auch geritten werden

C'est pas la chute, c'est l'atterrissage.
rcmatthews is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 02:18 AM   #9
Immortal
 
sabreur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Heidelberg, GE
Posts: 5,445
sabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by downunder
Proposition Nr. 7 by the Hungarian Fencing Federation


Re-establish AT SABRE the blocking times at 300-350 milliseconds (instead of the current 120
milliseconds).



Motivation : The introduction of the current Rule at 120 milliseconds is unfavourable to a fencer, who
executes a parade-riposte because his opponent who attacks, after the parade, in leaving his blade
on the valid surface (by a « remise ») always precedes such a riposte executed so quickly. The new
Rule reduces the moderated actions of this weapon.




Opinion of the Commission : not in favour : however, some members of the Commission
confirm that the problem as described does exist
and would be in favour of a slight increase in
the blockage time.
Geeze, it is wonderful that reality is able to intrude into their fantasy world to the point where they recognize that the problem exists.

It isn't a huge issue, because actions off the blade aren't that important anyway, and if you execute the action sharply, you'll still get the touch. But there IS a problem, and properly executed parry-ripostes and beat-attacks do get closed out.

MR
__________________
Why sabre? Because you don't take heads with the point.
sabreur is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 02:36 AM   #10
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,151
KD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond reputeKD5MDK has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to KD5MDK
I think the new timings encourage effective parries and strong ripostes, but that's just me.
KD5MDK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 02:53 AM   #11
Curmudgeon-in-Chief
 
Inquartata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Somewhere in your nightmares!
Posts: 23,475
Inquartata has a reputation beyond reputeInquartata has a reputation beyond reputeInquartata has a reputation beyond reputeInquartata has a reputation beyond reputeInquartata has a reputation beyond reputeInquartata has a reputation beyond reputeInquartata has a reputation beyond reputeInquartata has a reputation beyond reputeInquartata has a reputation beyond reputeInquartata has a reputation beyond reputeInquartata has a reputation beyond repute
IMO they encourage hesitant ripostes. Whereas before you could riposte smoothly, if not lightning fast, with confidence that a remise would not be awarded priority, now you must adopt a certain amount of caution while riposting, lest you get locked out by a point-waving opponent grazing you on the way in. You now have to allow for the possibility of that remise, and may have to take the blade a second time before your final cut---or pause in your advance in order to let the remise miss...which may well lose you ROW.
Inquartata is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 03:19 AM   #12
Immortal
 
sabreur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Heidelberg, GE
Posts: 5,445
sabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond reputesabreur has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by KD5MDK
I think the new timings encourage effective parries and strong ripostes, but that's just me.
They encourage a certain kind of parry--one that is taken moving forward and is almost a counter-attack with opposition. Two lights, the parry-riposte gets priority.

The new timings have made it easier to call a parry versus a whipover--again, two lights go on, the parry was good and the riposte has priority.

However, the new timings have made a quinte parry a considerably riskier action, because it is difficult to make the parry and complete the riposte without being locked out by a whipover or remise. And they've made it almost impossible to take a prime successfully.

They also have made a stop-cut into the final motion of an attack much less risky, and have made a beat attack very high adventure indeed. Particularly against an opponent who is retreating.

Net result. Actions on the blade (parries or beats) have become riskier, so good fencers use fewer of them. Which makes sabre, which is already basically a game of footwork, even more so.
__________________
Why sabre? Because you don't take heads with the point.
sabreur is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Foilists: What are you hoping for in terms of timings for next season? dramamine Fencing Discussion 27 01-15-2006 07:08 PM
Happy New Year 135711 Water Cooler 0 01-01-2003 02:37 PM
first year of competitions botmer Discussion Archive 25 10-20-2002 07:01 AM
the new year in arconia Fencing Angel Discussion Archive 10 01-02-2002 03:33 PM
Happy New Year Craig Discussion Archive 1 01-08-2001 03:11 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 AM.


(c) 1995 - 2007 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 -    Medieval Swords from the online Replica Sword Shop