My French ain't up to speed (execpt when I've just dropped 4 foil screws on the floor in a row and am in the "pardon my French mode"

), but I'm plugging it into the Systran website (www.systransoft.com) right now.
1. These are _proposals_, to be voted on at the next FIE Congress in Havana-- December of this year.
2. They're proposing reducing the double touch lockout time to 150 ms in Sabre, 250 ms in foil (i.e., if you hit your opponent, any hit they score on you will be blocked out by the maching if it arrives that much time later, regardless of whatever the ref might think has right-of-way). They will also modify refereeing conventions to give more precedence to stop hits in two-light actions. Further tests will be carried out at research centers in Moscow an Budapest.
COMMENTARY:
This essentially 'forces' a faster parsing of tempos for foil, and will favor stop hits into long, slow attacks or wind-ups for flicks. We've got an Eigertek machine at my club, and we've kept it set for the currently proposed 350 ms lockout time. It does have some effect, but not _that_ much-- you really can't 'time out' a flick hit with it. Now, the proposed time for foil is 100 ms shorter, so that may have a greater effect. The change in right-of-way conventions (presumably requiring the point to me more directly threating target section than current standards) will be more significant to this effect, in my opinion.
2. The foil tip debounce time (i.e., how long the foil point needs to be depressed for the machine to register a touch) will be incresed to 10 milliseconds. [note: the current minimum time is a range of 1-5 ms, with touches less than 1 ms being always rejected, touches greater than 5 ms being always registered]. As currently with sabre, the crossing over of the feet in an attack will be disallowed. Finally, extending the valid target to include the non-weapon arm will prevent covering valid target.
COMMENTARY: Eric Schlaepfer sent me firmware for the Eigertek that included the 10 ms debounce time. It does not make all that much difference. Only the most extreme, crack-the-whip-to-the-L1-vertebra flicks are rejected. You can still get a light on the more common top-of-the-shoulder flicks without much problem. As for extending the fleche-ban to foil, I really can't think of much to say right now (mind you, I just got back from a good Mexican place and have a couple of Margaritas fresh in me

). Frankly, I give the idea of making the back arm target as much a shot at reality as making the bib target had four years ago.
3. To aid the presentation and comprehension of bouts, the following six proposals are made:
The time limit for 5 touch bouts and for the rounds of team matches is shortened to 3 minutes.
[the auto tranlation becomes a bit garbled for the following section]If, during the prescribed time of the bout, no touch is scored for a period of one minute, the referee will halt the bout and mandate an additional minute. If, during that addtional minute neither fencer scores a touch, the bout will be ended and the leader declared the victor. If the score it tied at that point, the winner will be determined at random.
The bout is not considered ended until _after_ the fencers have saluted and the referee has declared the victor.
The distance between the on-guard lines will be shortened to reduce long, charging attacks.
The rules concerning corps-a-corps will be made uniform for all three weapons.
Placing the point on the piste an falling will no longer be penalized.
COMMENTARY: The shorter time limit and the rule concerning no touches occurring in a minute period will only significantly impact high school Women's Epee (donning Nomex suit and ducking

). Most of the other changes either don't make all that much sense to me, or (such at the one about the bout not being offically over until the salute) don't strike me as really being a change from current practice.
FINAL COMMENTARY: These all are PROPOSALS. They need to be approved by vote of the FIE Congress to actually take effect. As in the case of the foil bib becoming valid target, there's is no guarantee that such proposals will actually be accepted.
Lastly, anyone with a good knowledge of French should double check the original and correct any errors in my interpretation of the computer translation. Ich spreche Deutsch, I ya govoryu nyemnogo po russki, but my command of French is limited.
-Dave
[This message has been edited by neevel (edited 06-29-2001).]