07-21-2005, 04:54 AM
|
#1 | | Just Joined
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Singapore
Posts: 14
| Can someone tell me what's a redouble & appel in sabre? Can someone tell me what's a redouble & appel in sabre? |
| | | And now for this message... | |
07-21-2005, 07:33 AM
|
#2 | | Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 96
| Appel is a preperation made by striking the floor with the ball of your foot
Redouble is a renewal of an attack in a different line i.e in sabre it could be an attack to head which is parried and the reposte is delayed followed by a redouble to wrist. note if your opponent repostes straight away he has right of way. |
| |
07-21-2005, 11:49 AM
|
#3 | | Just Joined
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 29
| Appel/Balestra Is an appel similar to a balestra? In a balestra you do the same action, striking the floor with the ball of your foot, but it's a "jump", so both feet strike the ground at the same time. Tough to describe, but easy to recognize.
Or is an appel more like a tap, with just one foot?
Redouble is commonly used to refer to a lunge, right? Where you lunge, and then "redouble", meaning lunge again, without recovering first. |
| |
07-21-2005, 12:07 PM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 355
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by radtad82 Or is an appel more like a tap, with just one foot? | That's it.
A redouble is a renewal of the attack with footwork, e.g. lunge, forward recovery, lunge.
__________________ Some will sell their dreams for small desires |
| |
07-21-2005, 02:19 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,468
| I thought a redouble was an obsolete fencing move in which two lunges were linked together? |
| |
07-21-2005, 02:36 PM
|
#6 | | Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Miami
Posts: 2,573
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by mrbiggs I thought a redouble was an obsolete fencing move in which two lunges were linked together? | Isn't that just a double lunge?
t.8.d.2
Redoublement
"A new action, either simple or compound, made againstan opponent who has parried without riposting or who has merely avoided the first action by retreating or displacing the target."
Last edited by HDG; 07-21-2005 at 02:37 PM.
Reason: typo
|
| |
07-21-2005, 04:10 PM
|
#7 | | Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 96
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by HDG Isn't that just a double lunge?
t.8.d.2
Redoublement
"A new action, either simple or compound, made againstan opponent who has parried without riposting or who has merely avoided the first action by retreating or displacing the target." | Er isn't that a reprise? |
| |
07-21-2005, 04:32 PM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: London
Posts: 1,216
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Tiwaz Er isn't that a reprise? | No, a reprise specifically requires a return to the en garde position. |
| |
07-21-2005, 04:47 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver, BC, the WET coast of Canada
Posts: 1,971
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by sophia*alexis Can someone tell me what's a redouble & appel in sabre? |
"Redoublement" and "reprise" are clearly explained in the FIE Rules for competition.
A sabre appel is different from a foil appel but the intent and functions are the same.
A sabre appel is done with the weight of the body onthe front foot while the foil one is done with the weight on the rear foot.
Appels are similar to a body feints. See what Bruce Lee did.
PK |
| |
07-21-2005, 04:56 PM
|
#10 | | Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Miami
Posts: 2,573
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Tiwaz Er isn't that a reprise? | t.8.d.3
The reprise of the attack
"A new attack executed immediately after a return to the on-guard position"
I've been studying for the ref's exam... |
| |
07-21-2005, 05:26 PM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,683
| In my experience, the words Remise, Reprise, and Redouble are used to mean different things by different people.
Some people will tell you one thing, others will tell you exactly the opposite. Believe what's in the rulebook if you like, believe what your instructor tells you, or believe whatever you like, as long as the person you're talking to understands what you mean.
Where I come from they say:
Remise: A continuation of a failed attack in the same line as the original.
Reprise: A continuation of a failed attack in a different line as the original.
Redouble: A continuation of a failed attack after a return to guard (usually a forward recovery).
-p |
| |
07-21-2005, 05:26 PM
|
#12 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,174
| Quote:
A sabre appel is different from a foil appel but the intent and functions are the same.
A sabre appel is done with the weight of the body onthe front foot while the foil one is done with the weight on the rear foot.
| I've never heard that before. |
| |
07-21-2005, 05:30 PM
|
#13 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,174
| I would agree with peet's definitions (which match the rulebook, I believe) with the caveat that many people are lazy and call anything after a failed attack a remise, even if it was actually a redoublement. |
| |
07-21-2005, 05:50 PM
|
#14 | | Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Miami
Posts: 2,573
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by KD5MDK I would agree with peet's definitions (which match the rulebook, I believe) with the caveat that many people are lazy and call anything after a failed attack a remise, even if it was actually a redoublement. | I've also noticed people avoiding the terms altogether and just using the blanket term "continuation". I try very hard not to fall into this trap, but I confess to being guilty of it sometimes... |
| |
07-21-2005, 07:50 PM
|
#15 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,174
| To be fair, it's not an incredibly important distinction. Calling it correctly indicates that the referee did clearly see what happened, but whatever it is, if it's a fencing action starting with re-, it has dead last priority anyhow.
Heh. I can just see it: Quote:
Ref:
Simultaneous attacks. Both miss.
Left redoubles, Right Reprises at the same time.
Redouble comes first in the rule book, so Left Touch.
| |
| |
07-21-2005, 09:29 PM
|
#16 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 357
| appel/balestra The appel is just the front foot moving to strike the floor. Depending on whom you talk to, it's anywhere from just trying really hard to make a loud noise with your front foot while staying in place to making a soft half-advance (just front foot of advance). The balestra is a foward jump-lunge. Or just the forward jump part depending again on who's defining it. |
| |
07-22-2005, 06:51 AM
|
#17 | | Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 96
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by kalivor No, a reprise specifically requires a return to the en garde position. | woops miss read the rule.  |
| |
07-22-2005, 06:58 AM
|
#18 | | Fencing Expert
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Angel, London
Posts: 2,484
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by KD5MDK Calling it correctly indicates that the referee did clearly see what happened, |
correct calling is just remise. Don't use any other terms unless you need to explain the phrase further to the fencers or you are coaching them or something else. If you are there to referee properly, you use remise as a blanket term.
I understand this may be different if you are sitting for your rules exam. |
| |
07-22-2005, 11:50 AM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 363
| redouble: A move that a fencer does when the price of fencing gear goes up again (Related to "double take")
appel: The proper way to introduce oneself to a French fencing coach. "Je m'appel..."
The other definitions are more correct. I like these better, though. 
__________________
Some people are like slinkys. They serve no useful purpose, but it sure feels good when you push them down the stairs.
|
| |
07-22-2005, 01:02 PM
|
#20 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: London
Posts: 502
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by downunder correct calling is just remise. Don't use any other terms unless you need to explain the phrase further to the fencers or you are coaching them or something else. If you are there to referee properly, you use remise as a blanket term.
I understand this may be different if you are sitting for your rules exam. | Although of course the FIE rules allow for the ref explaining actions with remise and redouble as evidenced by the remark underneath the pictures of the signal explaining their is no signal for remise, riposte or redouble [t.42]. 
__________________ I caught this morning morning’s minion, king-
dom of daylight’s dauphin, dapple-dawn-drawn Falcon, in his riding
Of the rolling level underneath him steady air, and striding
High there, how he rung upon the rein of a wimpling wing
In his ecstasy! then off, off forth on swing,
As a skate’s heel sweeps smooth on a bow-bend: the hurl and gliding
Rebuffed the big wind. My heart in hiding
Stirred for a bird,—the achieve of; the mastery of the thing! |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 PM. |