| Boycotts, and how they affect athletes Open for general discussion: boycotting fencing events?
I understand the emotional weight behind the decision to boycott a ruling body in *any* sport. And, yes, I'm sure that the boycotters believe that their actions will somehow prompt significant change somewhere along the way.
But is it fair to publicly ask each individual competitor on the day of the event, in front of everyone, to stand up or stand down in a boycott? It's sort of wacky, but some athletes actually show up for competitions to ... well, compete. Politics be damned. They work hard; they invest time, energy and money; they show up to be the best athletes they can be. And what happens? -- Wham! "For political reasons, you can't play today."
Worse yet, a boycott isn't even necessary when everyone knows that the deplorable situation (in this case, the limit of 10 fencing events instead of 12) is temporary anyway, and that it *will* be changed in the following years regardless of whether a boycott is held now. Where's the logic in that? Seems pretty darn spiteful and shortsighted to me. |