topleft topright

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Fencing Photos

  1. #1
    Jonathan Jefferies
    Guest

    Fencing Photos

    Here is a link to some interesting photos (foil and epee)
    taken in the S.F. Bay area. Photographer was experimenting with
    having the shutter connected to the scoring machine
    and the results are right interesting. The warmer colored
    photos are from Pacific Fencing Club with one shot
    of Harold Hayes watching some action (the only photo without
    the fencer being masked).
    The more metallic machine toned photos (predominantly
    of epee) I believe were taken down at EMFC at a tournament.
    The ambient lighting obviously deterring the coloration.

    http://www.flickershutter.com/Gallery/index.htm

    Note that there are three pages of photos with arrows
    to move between and clicking on a photo downloads the
    full photo. Some of the actions are quite remarkable.
    I recognize Phil Gerring of GGFC and Dick King from
    Stanford as well as Julian Sauviang (sp??) from Cal Berkeley
    (fencer down absolutely low with a parry fourth hit jpg 045,
    typical of Julian) in the epee shots. Sneaky begger, stands
    there like he isn't going to move and then pulls a super
    long lunge like the one shown to hit with a bind in 4th.
    If he doesn't get you on the initial attack goes into in-
    fighting in 4th remise.

    There are also some other photos also on the site but without
    as much action.

    Jonathan

  2. #2
    Ole-Morten Duesund
    Guest

    Re: Fencing Photos

    On 2005-04-30, Jonathan Jefferies <jonathanjefferies@alamedanet.net> wrote:
    > Here is a link to some interesting photos (foil and epee)
    > taken in the S.F. Bay area. Photographer was experimenting with
    > having the shutter connected to the scoring machine
    > and the results are right interesting. The warmer colored
    > photos are from Pacific Fencing Club with one shot
    > of Harold Hayes watching some action (the only photo without
    > the fencer being masked).
    > The more metallic machine toned photos (predominantly
    > of epee) I believe were taken down at EMFC at a tournament.
    > The ambient lighting obviously deterring the coloration.
    >
    > http://www.flickershutter.com/Gallery/index.htm


    Very nice photos, and I want a place like this
    http://www.flickershutter.com/Gallery/pages/019.htm :-)

    Do you know how exactly the photographer connected the camera
    and the scoring machine? I see lots of nice possibilities.

    --
    Ole-Morten Duesund

  3. #3
    John Hasler
    Guest

    Re: Fencing Photos

    Ole-Morten Duesund writes:
    > Do you know how exactly the photographer connected the camera and the
    > scoring machine? I see lots of nice possibilities.


    It's against the rules to actually connect anything to the box. Back in
    the late seventies I built a gadget that "watched" the lights with
    photocells on flexible stalks and sent a signal to a camera at the far end
    of a cable.
    --
    John Hasler
    john@dhh.gt.org
    Dancing Horse Hill
    Elmwood, WI USA

  4. #4
    Ole-Morten Duesund
    Guest

    Re: Fencing Photos

    On 2005-05-03, John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org> wrote:
    > Ole-Morten Duesund writes:
    >> Do you know how exactly the photographer connected the camera and the
    >> scoring machine? I see lots of nice possibilities.

    >
    > It's against the rules to actually connect anything to the box. Back in
    > the late seventies I built a gadget that "watched" the lights with
    > photocells on flexible stalks and sent a signal to a camera at the far end
    > of a cable.


    For competition I can see the problem with connectin anything to the
    box, but for practice and/or demonstration purposes it shouldn't be a
    problem - now I'll just have to pick apart one of the club's boxes :-)

    But the photocell solution would be nice as well, not to mention usable
    during competitions...

    --
    Ole-Morten Duesund

  5. #5
    Wolf
    Guest

    Re: Fencing Photos

    >>> Do you know how exactly the photographer connected the camera and the
    >>> scoring machine? I see lots of nice possibilities.

    >>
    >> It's against the rules to actually connect anything to the box. Back in
    >> the late seventies I built a gadget that "watched" the lights with
    >> photocells on flexible stalks and sent a signal to a camera at the far
    >> end
    >> of a cable.

    >
    > For competition I can see the problem with connectin anything to the
    > box, but for practice and/or demonstration purposes it shouldn't be a
    > problem - now I'll just have to pick apart one of the club's boxes :-)
    >
    > But the photocell solution would be nice as well, not to mention usable
    > during competitions...
    >
    > --
    > Ole-Morten Duesund


    Wouldn't it be easier to have something sitting between the floor cord and
    the box, and having it watch for a voltage/current spike? It's not like it
    matters whether it was a colored light or not, you can dump those
    afterwards.

    -Bill



  6. #6
    John Hasler
    Guest

    Re: Fencing Photos

    I wrote:
    > It's against the rules to actually connect anything to the box. Back in
    > the late seventies I built a gadget that "watched" the lights with
    > photocells on flexible stalks and sent a signal to a camera at the far
    > end of a cable.


    Wolf writes:
    > Wouldn't it be easier to have something sitting between the floor cord
    > and the box, and having it watch for a voltage/current spike? It's not
    > like it matters whether it was a colored light or not, you can dump those


    Not enough easier to matter: the photocell gadget was trivial (it sat on
    the table and watched the lights on the box).
    --
    John Hasler
    john@dhh.gt.org
    Dancing Horse Hill
    Elmwood, WI USA

  7. #7
    Jonathan Jefferies
    Guest

    Re: Fencing Photos

    Ole-Morten Duesund wrote:

    >
    > Do you know how exactly the photographer connected the camera
    > and the scoring machine? I see lots of nice possibilities.
    >

    Not Actually. I saw him doing the photography at Pacific Fencing Club
    but I didn't investigate the mechanism. Given the delay time between
    hit and lights (which can be considerable) he must pick it off early.
    Perhaps you could try emailing flickershutter and asking them. Haven't
    heard any gossip about their trying to make it into a product
    so if it's just one guy's technique he might be willing to share.
    I'll ask tonight when I go down for entertainment. Wednesday is the
    day that I don't fence so my body can recuperate. So I go down and
    watch the foilists.

    Jonathan


  8. #8
    Jonathan Jefferies
    Guest

    Re: Fencing Photos

    John Hasler wrote:
    >
    > It's against the rules to actually connect anything to the box. Back in
    > the late seventies I built a gadget that "watched" the lights with
    > photocells on flexible stalks and sent a signal to a camera at the far end
    > of a cable.


    John,
    Where is this covered in the rules?? I don't remember anything
    addressing this issue and would like to review that.

    thanks
    Jonathan Jefferies

  9. #9
    Sarah Morgan
    Guest

    Re: Fencing Photos

    Jonathan Jefferies wrote:

    > Here is a link to some interesting photos (foil and epee)
    > taken in the S.F. Bay area.


    > Jonathan


    More fencing photos can be found @ http://www.martinjgreen.me.uk/gallery - a
    lot less than there used to be, due to bandwidth considerations I believe,
    but still quite a few there.

    __________________________________________________ ________________________
    grep me no patterns and I'll tell you no lines

    Sarah Morgan
    mail (at) sarahmorgan.me.uk

  10. #10
    Martin J. Green
    Guest

    Re: Fencing Photos


    "Sarah Morgan" <mail@NOSPAM.sarahmorgan.me.uk> wrote in message
    news:427c0c15_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...

    > More fencing photos can be found @ http://www.martinjgreen.me.uk/gallery -
    > a
    > lot less than there used to be, due to bandwidth considerations I believe,
    > but still quite a few there.


    Indeed. I may readd them, as it was google who was causing the most usage by
    indexing them, however they were also using up a GB in space...



Similar Threads

  1. Fencing FAQ (part 3)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Rec Sport Fencing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-20-2011, 10:45 AM
  2. Fencing FAQ (part 1)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Rec Sport Fencing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-26-2005, 03:00 AM
  3. Fencing FAQ (part 1)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-10-2003, 10:33 AM
  4. Fencing FAQ (part 1)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-10-2003, 10:31 AM
  5. Fencing FAQ (part 3)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-10-2003, 10:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30