Foil timings to change in Sept - Page 2 - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > General Fencing > Fencing Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-01-2005, 01:01 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 148
ChubbyHubby has a spectacular aura aboutChubbyHubby has a spectacular aura aboutChubbyHubby has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan
My expression does not count anyway ...
I agree. So why waste energy on it?
ChubbyHubby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 04-01-2005, 01:34 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 707
Alan is a splendid one to beholdAlan is a splendid one to beholdAlan is a splendid one to beholdAlan is a splendid one to beholdAlan is a splendid one to beholdAlan is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChubbyHubby
I agree. So why waste energy on it?
Because i like defending the real foil.
__________________
.
Just forget these broken foil test timings !

Use clear visor masks for fishing,

and video to film your mother-in-law.
Alan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2005, 02:04 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
RebelFencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: South Carolina über Alles
Posts: 2,608
RebelFencer has a reputation beyond reputeRebelFencer has a reputation beyond reputeRebelFencer has a reputation beyond reputeRebelFencer has a reputation beyond reputeRebelFencer has a reputation beyond reputeRebelFencer has a reputation beyond reputeRebelFencer has a reputation beyond reputeRebelFencer has a reputation beyond reputeRebelFencer has a reputation beyond reputeRebelFencer has a reputation beyond reputeRebelFencer has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to RebelFencer
Hey, look on the bright side C.H. At least he hasn't brought out the "foilepee" rant yet!
__________________
RebelFencer's Awesome Quote of the Week:
"Encouraging the average age of first intercourse to go below 16?"
-Army Fencer
RebelFencer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2005, 02:48 PM   #24
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 59
Jarentz has a spectacular aura aboutJarentz has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan

2) The lockout will still be to favorable to defense, remise, counter attacks.

3) How will the young children learn the convention with such a short lockout
(specially for them) ?
They will get bad habits of contorsions, protections from the beginning.

The lockout must put be back to a longer value.
Have you ever actually fenced with this machine?!
The new lockout has hardly any effect on foil at all, 300ms is a very long time compared with the 40ms used in epee. I have to wonder what kind of fencing people are doing that they're getting "locked out" by a 300 ms blocking time. The commission in Havana actually recommended 200ms.
Jarentz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2005, 06:42 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 360
dramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan
This is good news but done without torough testing could be worse :

1) I predict foilists will develop very soon a technique of flicked counter attack and escape.

2) The lockout will still be to favorable to defense, remise, counter attacks.

3) How will the young children learn the convention with such a short lockout
(specially for them) ?
They will get bad habits of contorsions, protections from the beginning.

The lockout must put be back to a longer value.
Having fenced a large number of competitions against many different levels of fencer on the new timing, I would agree that the current (unofficial) timings support ducks, counter attacks, and remises. The lockout time influences this, but is not the cause of it. Typically what I have seen happen is:

A attacks
B parries (lets say counter six)
A puts his head down and remises
B begins flick riposte to back, realises "oh yeah that won't work" and then gives a straight riposte afterwards

result: a one light touch for A, but I would say the main cause is indecision on B's part which will go away once he adjusts. Or alternatively will go away if the times switch to 8ms.

A couple things to say about the remises/ducks:

1) First of all, I am not the level of fencer you are looking for but I am not a beginner and I have been able to adjust my flicks to hit fencers who duck, even with the new timings.

2) Second of all even if I am not flicking I have learned other ways to put the tip on within the 300ms lockout.

3) The reason the duck/remise/counterattack was so much less common with the old timings was IMO much more the debounce than the lockout. Currently (new times) when I am pressing my opponent I have a few less options in terms of target area to finish on, so that even the threat of a counter attack makes me much more hesistant: here is where the lockout time comes in. The attacker is now punished much more for his indecision : previously if I was advancing right hander to right hander planning a flick to the chest, and my opponent did one of those contortionist "put my head down close four and stab" things all I had to do was react to that by hitting him on the open target, the back. Even if I was late to react or was hit quite early all I had to do was turn a light on in reasonable time. Now, the attacker must choose the right line much more quickly, which is taking some getting used to but is not necessarily bad.


I really hope the 8ms goes through, I would love this lockout time if I could just flick those remisy bastards on the back again.
dramamine is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2005, 06:59 PM   #26
Fencing Expert
 
edew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: CA area
Posts: 6,130
edew has a reputation beyond reputeedew has a reputation beyond reputeedew has a reputation beyond reputeedew has a reputation beyond reputeedew has a reputation beyond reputeedew has a reputation beyond reputeedew has a reputation beyond reputeedew has a reputation beyond reputeedew has a reputation beyond reputeedew has a reputation beyond reputeedew has a reputation beyond repute
I guess it'll be another $200 for new chips (for my four machines). Maybe Dieter can chime in about what he's heard. I don't want to buy another chip only to realize that it'll be obsolete by the end of the season.
__________________
=)=///
edew is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2005, 07:21 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 360
dramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant futuredramamine has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by edew
I guess it'll be another $200 for new chips (for my four machines). Maybe Dieter can chime in about what he's heard. I don't want to buy another chip only to realize that it'll be obsolete by the end of the season.
Agreed. It's unreasonable but I guess that's yet another argument for thorough testing.
dramamine is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2005, 01:10 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
DieterS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 274
DieterS is a name known to allDieterS is a name known to allDieterS is a name known to allDieterS is a name known to allDieterS is a name known to allDieterS is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by edew
I guess it'll be another $200 for new chips (for my four machines). Maybe Dieter can chime in about what he's heard. I don't want to buy another chip only to realize that it'll be obsolete by the end of the season.
As you know, we're not happy with the flurry of rumors (which I don't want to pass along), poorly tested timing changes, and confusion! We have no confidence at this point that there won't be AT LEAST one more change. There's nothing we can do but accommodate and adapt.

So, it is our intention to supply you and other owners of Eigertek Eclipses a free upgrade to what will hopefully be the permanent timings once they're announced as such by the FIE and accepted the USFA. Obviously, we can't afford to do this every time there is a change, nor can we predict how many other changes will come to pass, so we have to limit our commitment. But we do hope to take at least some of the sting out of further rules changes!

Dieter Schlaepfer
President, Eigertek
DieterS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Old results postings fencingguy Fencing Discussion 7 08-29-2005 11:03 PM
Fencing FAQ (part 2) Morgan Burke Fencing Discussion 0 03-10-2003 10:33 AM
Fencing FAQ (part 2) Morgan Burke Fencing Discussion 0 03-10-2003 10:31 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 PM.


(c) 1995 - 2007 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 -    Medieval Swords from the online Replica Sword Shop