topleft topright

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 38 of 38
  1. #21
    Fencing Expert Array achilleus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    greece
    Posts
    3,379
    Quote Originally Posted by DHCJr
    The pictures given have no effect to the questions as the colors are on the leg. The ones on the jacket are illegal, even if they were considered light or pastel. See M.25.3, since the 'light' rule is only on the torso (I am using the French FIE rules) and they must be a solid color.

    Yes they seem to ignored the rule for this competiton.
    All the photos weren't from one competition. They were from various world cup competitions, and the uniforms were marked FIE approved. Much like the Uhlmann color block uniforms similar to what Cuomo was wearing...
    We're no threat, people, we're not dirty, we're not mean
    We love everybody but we do as we please
    When the weather's fine,
    We go fishin' or go swimmin' in the sea
    We're always happy
    Life's for livin', yeah, that's our philosophy

  2. #22
    Armorer Array DHCJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Long Beach, CA / Las Vegas
    Posts
    4,428
    Yes, and the Uniforms with 3 long stripes that have the FIE logo were NOT allowed at several world cups competitions. Just because rules are not followed, doesn't mean they are right.
    Donald Hollis Clinton, Jr.
    DHCJr@juno.com

    To Teach is to Learn (Japanese Proverb)

    Knowing the rule book by heart means nothing, if you don't understand the rules.

  3. #23
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    33
    You're overcomplicating the issue.

    The real thing you need to be concerned with isn't the technical definition of a pastel, but rather what the judge perceives as pastel.

    To be on the safe side, use a pink that is clearly recognizable as a light color. Anything that is iffy in the judge's mind might give you trouble, whether it is technically legal or not.

  4. #24
    Senior Member Array Cipher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    364
    In m.25 of the rulebook it says:

    "Fencers’ clothing may be of different colors, but on the body it must be a single color, white or a light shade."

    Now not only do you need a working definition of light, but also of body. You can take that to mean the entire body, down to the hands and feet or just the torso, excluding limbs and head. If the latter is the case, then the whole point is moot in foil and sabre since the "body" or "torso" is entirely covered by a lame. For epee, I'm not sure... I guess that would mean that any color is open for breeches and the arms of the jacket, but the "torso" would then have to have a "light" color. Since the whole body is a target in epee, it kind of goes against the intent of the rule though. Not that it really even matters now that everything is electric.

    You also have to take into account that regardless of whether or not you may be technically right, you're going to run up against a traditionalist that isn't going to be happy with anything but white.

    I'm not even going to get in on the "light" part of the discussion. That term is way too subjective for my liking.
    Everybody has to believe in something. I believe I am going to have another beer.

  5. #25
    Armorer Array DHCJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Long Beach, CA / Las Vegas
    Posts
    4,428
    The English translation is suspect. I would translate the French rulebook as either Trunk or Torso. You said it would not be a problem in Foil and Epee. That is not entirely true. How many WHITE lames do you have? Then look at what is below the lame at the back and the lower part of the Sabre lame.

    I just LOVE the clear, consistent, non-contradictory, concise rules of fencing.

    One of my favorites is the first part of M.13.
    Donald Hollis Clinton, Jr.
    DHCJr@juno.com

    To Teach is to Learn (Japanese Proverb)

    Knowing the rule book by heart means nothing, if you don't understand the rules.

  6. #26
    Unconfirmed Array Victor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,022
    Quote Originally Posted by jBirch
    500 was just a number I pulled out of my butt as an example. ...
    The last thing we need is a ref pulling anything out of his butt.

  7. #27
    Unconfirmed Array Victor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,022
    Thanks for the discussion. I brought up the question (as ill-formed as it might be) because it seems like a natural evolution from what's already happening. Fencers are playing with the colors in their masks, socks, shoes and gloves because they are pretty clear about what the rules allow. Likewise, patches are clearly defined as well (I think). The main body uniform color is just a step away.

  8. #28
    Senior Member Array Cipher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    364
    I would say that as far as electric is concerned, why not give quite a bit of discretion to the competitors. It's not like refs really need to see where the blade hits, that's what the machines are for. Hell, having exceptionally colorful gloves, or at least a glove of a different color than the rest of the uniform might actually help in determining some of those right of way calls.

    As far as dry is concerned, I'd say stick to the light colors to facilitate refs having a decent contrast between blade/tip and target area.
    Everybody has to believe in something. I believe I am going to have another beer.

  9. #29
    Unconfirmed Array Victor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,022
    Anyone here ever had to match up a paint chip for a house remodeling job? I just remembered the last time we wanted a can of a particular color, the Home Despot clerk used a nifty machine that analyzed the sample into its component colors to make the mix match. There's gotta be something simple like that available on the market to test for how much white (or lightness) comprises a jacket color.

  10. #30
    Senior Member Array sabreur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Heidelberg, GE
    Posts
    5,827
    Blog Entries
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by Tydive
    Hope that you are not dealing with a color blind judge.
    Since you've chosen to comment on one of my particular genetic defects, I will tell you that determining whether something is pastel or not is a matter of judging intensity or shade, not hue. Most color-blind people actually judge intensity or shade BETTER than non-color-blind people.

    MR
    Why sabre? Because you don't take heads with the point.

  11. #31
    Moderator Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    12,164
    Quote Originally Posted by sabreur
    Since you've chosen to comment on one of my particular genetic defects, I will tell you that determining whether something is pastel or not is a matter of judging intensity or shade, not hue. Most color-blind people actually judge intensity or shade BETTER than non-color-blind people.

    MR


    When I pass my referee's test, a lot of people will begin dealing with a colorblind judge.


    Is there a seperate rule on colored lames? I've seen some striking ones. (And white ones, for whoever brought it up upthread)

  12. #32
    Senior Member Array kalivor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,742
    The metric is simple, really ... it's the Inq test!

    That is, the uniform in question is presented to Inq for inspection. His reaction is measured (volume of sweat, amounts of bile produced, and the general volume at which he registers his disgust). Each of these measurements is awarded a number of points, and once a uniform reaches a certain point threshold, the uniform is too far removed from white to be considered pastel.

    Of course, the exact point awards and threshold would need to be determined via extensive testing ...

  13. #33
    Senior Member Array Maeve_Mari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,536
    And anything beyond stank and dingy will be promptly rejected by our community's incommodious curmudgeon

  14. #34
    Senior Member Array Capt. Slo-mo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    3,683
    I was going to suggest that we use Inquartata as the definitive example of pastel. How so, you ask?

    Simple. We dispatch a digital photographer to his house. A series of carefully selected tye-died uniforms and painted masks are presented for his inspection. When the choleric upswelling on Inq's face has reached near-stroke proportions, the photographer snaps a quick picture.

    This picture is then loaded into a vectorscope with chromatic scanning. Any suspect uniform is compared against the bright, flaming red control color in the vectorscope. If it is 65% or less chromatically intense, the color passes as pastel.

    Glad I could be of service.
    "Sometimes we, as coaches, get into that dictator mode where you just tell and you don't listen and you don't try to understand them." Tom Izzo, Mich. St.
    "Fraud is the creation of trust. And then: its betrayal."
    William Black, Ph.D.

  15. #35
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,126
    Hmm.. if you really wanted to identify specific "pastel" colors, do what the professional printing industry does. All colors printed are matched using the Pantone Matching System (PMS). Specific colors and the composition of that color are specified, which is available down to the specific combination of inks to produce that color, or other methods of reproducing it. They do this in the printing industry to ensure that reproduction of colors is exact the same anywhere in the industry or in any publication.

    A quick search shows that Pantone identifies 126 pastel colors, and for $59 at Pantone.com you can get a set of the formulas to reproduce these, plus a book of exact matches to these colors. (These look like the book of color chips you get at a paint store, but only for the 126 pastel colors).

    Let the FIE just specificy what pastel colors are acceptable through the Pantone system, and you will have an exact definition of the color that is exactly reproducible. Judging the color can be done through a visual matching against the color chips (such as by a judge at a tournament), or by reference to a manufacturer who made the clothes certifying he matched to an exact Pantone color to ensure compliance. In doubt, you can scan a colored fabric into the computer, and many desktop publishing packages allow you to identify the color in Pantone reference. There's also about a $250-300 handheld spectro-colorimeter device that you can put on the cloth, and will give you the exact pantone color match.

    There.. is that an appropriately nerdish answer?

  16. #36
    Senior Member Array foilz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    210
    D+F+P=H is correct. Pastel is pastel if there's more white in the color than color.

    If you need words, Webster's says "a soft, pale shade of any color."

  17. #37
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,886
    Hi!

    Quote Originally Posted by Larrison
    Hmm.. if you really wanted to identify specific "pastel" colors, do what the professional printing industry does. All colors printed are matched using the Pantone Matching System (PMS).
    As has been touched upon before, we will just have to wait for a PMS reaction in Inq!



    Have a nice time!

    Peter Gustafsson

  18. #38
    Fencing Expert Array downunder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,521
    Quote Originally Posted by Larrison
    Let the FIE just specificy what pastel colors are acceptable through the Pantone system, and you will have an exact definition of the color that is exactly reproducible.

    pastel is not an FIE term


    The official translation is "light", as previously stated, not that it makes it clearer

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Fencing FAQ (part 1)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Rec Sport Fencing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-26-2005, 02:00 AM
  2. Fencing FAQ (part 1)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-10-2003, 09:33 AM
  3. Fencing FAQ (part 1)
    By Morgan Burke in forum Fencing Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-10-2003, 09:31 AM
  4. Any good clubs in colorado?
    By desolationdiva in forum Discussion Archive
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-27-2002, 11:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30