William Marshal wrote:
> Especially in light of the commentary, over on fencing.net, by a
What commentary?? Got a quick URL??

It's so hard to get any real information.
And I just scanned fencing.net and didn't
such commentary - not saying it's not there.
> fencer from Charlotte who has been past the venue recently. Apparently
> the area is, shall we say, seedy in the extreme, and the hotels nearby
> are fleabags. Moreover, road construction in the vicinity makes it
> impossible to get across the street from the hotels to the venue---a
> detour of a mile or so, through the aforementioned dubious
> neighborhood, seems to be required.
>
> He feels too that the shuttle will be a safer way to arrive and depart
> than to risk being accosted in the parking lot of the venue. All in
> all the picture I am forming of the location is not a complimentary
> one...
Accosted? how intriguing. Accosted as in Pssst man! You wanna duel or
something?? All of a sudden Charlotte begins to sound interesting.
Should I make room in my bag for a sharp??
Anyway it can't be any worse than my first time at Arlington, Tx.
There we were behind a strip joint and a tattoo parlor right around
the corner from a tobacco store with psychedelic products. The second
time was much more sedate. But frankly it really doesn't matter as long
as the rooms are acceptable and the beds firm and no smoking.
But please do publish a pointer to the commentary.
J.