Greatest US. president - poll continuation #1 - Fencing.Net Discussion
topleft topright

Go Back   Fencing.Net Discussion > General Fencing > Water Cooler > Politics

View Poll Results: Who has been the greatest US. President?
Washington 3 14.29%
Jefferson 2 9.52%
Jackson 0 0%
Lincoln 1 4.76%
T. Roosevelt 6 28.57%
F. Roosevelt 5 23.81%
Truman 0 0%
Reagan 1 4.76%
Clinton 3 14.29%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2005, 04:35 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,033
PeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond repute
Greatest US. president - poll continuation #1

Hi!

The first "Greatest US. President" poll gave a splintered result, with the winner taking 21% of the total votes. For my own amusement, I thought that it would be interesting to see what a run-off election would give. I will run short polls, and until some canidate gets 50% or more there will be a new poll, with the loser from the previous one deleted as a possible poll alternative. In the 1st poll, Presidents Jackson and Kennedy shared this unenviable position with one vote each. I, somewhat arbitrarily, chose to delete Kennedy since he did not served out his term. I do not know of any better objective tiebreaker right now. Should be interesting to see where this leads us.

Have a nice time!

Peter Gustafsson

PS. The first poll results were:
Washington 9 11.11%
Jefferson 8 9.88%
Jackson 1 1.23%
Lincoln 17 20.99%
T. Roosevelt 12 14.81%
F. Roosevelt 11 13.58%
Truman 2 2.47%
Kennedy 1 1.23%
Reagan 11 13.58%
Clinton 9 11.11%
PeterGustafsson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
And now for this message...
Go Green members don't see these ads.


Old 02-12-2005, 06:08 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
LordTofuDog-jnr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Kilda, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 605
LordTofuDog-jnr has a spectacular aura aboutLordTofuDog-jnr has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to LordTofuDog-jnr
Frankly I find it insulting that anybody could vote against Bill Clinton. The man had an affair, lied to the people, and is still uber popular - and stylish!
Oh and he is friends with Nelson Mandela and that makes the abbolition of slavery seem small.
__________________
I'm so cool; put me in a fridge and it gets colder!
I'm Australian and that makes me MANLY!
LordTofuDog-jnr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2005, 02:30 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Epee_Pox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ---->
Posts: 2,086
Epee_Pox has a reputation beyond reputeEpee_Pox has a reputation beyond reputeEpee_Pox has a reputation beyond reputeEpee_Pox has a reputation beyond reputeEpee_Pox has a reputation beyond reputeEpee_Pox has a reputation beyond reputeEpee_Pox has a reputation beyond reputeEpee_Pox has a reputation beyond reputeEpee_Pox has a reputation beyond reputeEpee_Pox has a reputation beyond reputeEpee_Pox has a reputation beyond repute
This poll doesn't let you vote against anyone. You can only vote for someone.


I'd like to see a poll where you could place either a "for" or an "against" vote. See what drives people more.
__________________
Just because you have the right, that doesn't mean it is right.
Epee_Pox is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2005, 11:14 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,033
PeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond repute
Hi!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Epee_Pox
This poll doesn't let you vote against anyone. You can only vote for someone.

I'd like to see a poll where you could place either a "for" or an "against" vote. See what drives people more.
Duly noted. It would be interesting to see which president gets high both negative and positive ratings, and I make a poll for that also. However, since these 9 are mostly among the better, the negative ratings would not mean all that much - there are undoubtedly presidents who are more worthy of the questionable honor.


Have a nice time!

Peter Gustafsson
PeterGustafsson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 11:16 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
lochinvar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Posts: 2,993
lochinvar has a reputation beyond reputelochinvar has a reputation beyond reputelochinvar has a reputation beyond reputelochinvar has a reputation beyond reputelochinvar has a reputation beyond reputelochinvar has a reputation beyond reputelochinvar has a reputation beyond reputelochinvar has a reputation beyond reputelochinvar has a reputation beyond reputelochinvar has a reputation beyond reputelochinvar has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to lochinvar
I vote for Millard Filmore.
__________________
Nothing is more frightening than ignorance in action.
lochinvar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2005, 01:38 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
onesandzeros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 233
onesandzeros will become famous soon enoughonesandzeros will become famous soon enough
I voted for Prell to go back to the old glass bottle.
__________________
*Contains Sulfites
onesandzeros is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2005, 11:38 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,033
PeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond reputePeterGustafsson has a reputation beyond repute
Hi!


So, then this stage is finished then. Jackson and Truman both get zero votes, and are eliminated from further running. I had intended this poll series as an object lesson in runoff voting, but the interest seems to be waning, so if the number of cast votes in the next stage does not increase, I will call it quits.

I am personally surprised that Lincoln got so few votes. Also, the voting result seems to bear out the short memory of many people. The presidents serving in living memory - FDR and onwards - have amassed a total of 9 of 21 votes, a similar result as in the first poll (34 of 81). Those presidents have served in a 68-year span, out of the 224 years from Washington to Clinton. Bad history lessons?


Have a nice time!

Peter Gustafsson
PeterGustafsson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2005, 07:30 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
scrapinpeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Passing you on the inside... vroom
Posts: 1,299
scrapinpeg has a reputation beyond reputescrapinpeg has a reputation beyond reputescrapinpeg has a reputation beyond reputescrapinpeg has a reputation beyond reputescrapinpeg has a reputation beyond reputescrapinpeg has a reputation beyond reputescrapinpeg has a reputation beyond reputescrapinpeg has a reputation beyond reputescrapinpeg has a reputation beyond reputescrapinpeg has a reputation beyond reputescrapinpeg has a reputation beyond repute
They don't teach history in US schools. Just something called "social studies." Insert snarky comment here.
__________________
Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots.
scrapinpeg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poll(?) on interest in weapons-specific tapes edew Fencing Discussion 6 12-26-2002 04:55 PM
President of French fencing federation stands by Flessel, Attelly Craig Fencing Discussion 0 11-11-2002 04:57 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:05 AM.


(c) 1995 - 2007 Fencing Net; Fencing.Net, fdn, Fencing101, Epee101, Foil101, Sabre101 are all trademarks of Fencing.Net, LLC.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 -    Medieval Swords from the online Replica Sword Shop